Literature DB >> 32975569

Trends in Primary Treatment and Median Survival Among Women With Advanced-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in the US From 2004 to 2016.

Anne T Knisely1, Caryn M St Clair1, June Y Hou1, Fady Khoury Collado1, Dawn L Hershman2, Jason D Wright1, Alexander Melamed1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32975569      PMCID: PMC7519417          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Three published clinical trials[1,2,3] that randomized women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer to primary cytoreductive surgery before adjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy before interval cytoreductive surgery found no evidence of a progression-free or overall survival advantage for either approach. However, those studies did demonstrate a reduction in surgical morbidity in women assigned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nonetheless, most gynecologic oncologists believe that primary surgical treatment is the preferred approach for advanced ovarian cancer.[4] Since the publication of the first of those 3 randomized trials in 2010,[1] the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer has increased in the US.[5] The objective of this study was to examine and compare time trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the median survival among women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer in the United States.

Methods

The Columbia University institutional review board deemed this cohort study exempt from informed consent and review because it used an existing data set without patient identifiers. We used the National Cancer Database, a cancer registry maintained by the American College of Surgeons’ Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society, to identify women who received treatment (ie, chemotherapy, surgery, or both) for stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer that was diagnosed from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2016. We calculated the proportion of women diagnosed each year (with 95% CIs) who were treated with chemotherapy as the first treatment modality (neoadjuvant chemotherapy). The primary survival outcome was time from diagnosis to death or last follow-up. For women with mature survival data (ie, those who were diagnosed 2004 to 2013), we calculated median overall survival with 95% CIs using the Kaplan-Meier method for women diagnosed in each year. Using the Bayes information criteria to identify the number and location of join points, we fitted weighted log-linear join point models to evaluate trends in use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and median survival. The analysis was performed using the most recent National Cancer Database data (ie, diagnoses 2004 to 2016, follow-up survival through 2017). Statistical analysis was performed in August 2019 using Stata/MP statistical software version 16 (StataCorp). Two-sided P < .05 was considered significant, as evaluated using Wald tests.

Results

We identified 72 171 women treated for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer between 2004 and 2016, with mean (SD) age 63.0 (12.4) years (Table). Over the study period, 53 021 women were treated with primary cytoreductive surgery (73.5%) and 19 150 women were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (26.5%). From 2004 to 2006, 2976 of 16 875 women received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (17.6%), and that proportion did not change over that period (annual percentage change, 0.5%; 95% CI, −1.3% to 2.4%; P = .54) (Figure, A). The frequency of primary chemotherapy increased starting in 2006, increasing by 7.9% (95% CI, 7.0% to 8.7%) per year from 2006 to 2011 (P for change of trend < .001). Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy accelerated in 2011, increasing by 10.3% (95% CI, 9.1% to 11.5%) per year from 2011 to 2016 (P for change of trend = .01) (Figure, A). By 2016, 2481 of 5501 patients received chemotherapy as their initial treatment (45.1%).
Table.

Patient Characteristics

CharacteristicNo. (%)
Primary cytoreductive surgery (n = 53 021)Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 19 150)
Age, mean (SD), y62.3 (12.6)65.1 (11.7)
Cancer stage
IIIC37 176 (81.5)8440 (18.5)
IV15 845 (59.7)10 710 (40.33)
Tumor type
Serous adenocarcinoma39 438 (75.1)13 088 (24.9)
Endometrioid adenocarcinoma2348 (89.4)279 (10.6)
Clear cell adenocarcinoma1843 (82.8)383 (17.2)
Mucinous adenocarcinoma1372 (82.9)283 (17.1)
Other adenocarcinoma8020 (61.0)5117 (39.0)
Figure.

Time Trends in Use of Primary Chemotherapy and Median Survival in Commission on Cancer–accredited Cancer Centers in the United States

Whiskers indicate 95% CIs; dashed vertical lines, year when statistically significant changes of trend in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were identified by join point models; and solid lines, predictions from join point models.

Time Trends in Use of Primary Chemotherapy and Median Survival in Commission on Cancer–accredited Cancer Centers in the United States

Whiskers indicate 95% CIs; dashed vertical lines, year when statistically significant changes of trend in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were identified by join point models; and solid lines, predictions from join point models. Median survival increased from 31.1 (95% CI, 29.9 to 32.3) months in 2004 to 37.8 (95% CI, 36.4 to 38.8) months in 2013. Changing trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy during this period were not associated with a change in median survival trend, which increased by 2.1% (95% CI, 1.3% to 2.8%) per year (P for change of trend = .37). Results of a subgroup analysis restricted to patients with high-grade serous carcinoma were similar; increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy starting in 2006 was not associated with any change of trend in median survival, which increased by 2.0% per year (95% CI, 1.2% to 2.9%) over the study period (P for change of trend = .21) (Figure, B).

Discussion

This cohort study found that use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer increased from 17.6% in 2004 to 45.1% in 2016. As suggested by the results of randomized clinical trials,[1,2,3] uptake of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with any changes in median overall survival trends, which increased over the study period. Limitations of this study include the inability to establish a causal relationship between trends in treatment and outcome and the use of a data source that is not population based.
  5 in total

1.  Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Sean Kehoe; Jane Hook; Matthew Nankivell; Gordon C Jayson; Henry Kitchener; Tito Lopes; David Luesley; Timothy Perren; Selina Bannoo; Monica Mascarenhas; Stephen Dobbs; Sharadah Essapen; Jeremy Twigg; Jonathan Herod; Glenn McCluggage; Mahesh Parmar; Ann-Marie Swart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ignace Vergote; Claes G Tropé; Frédéric Amant; Gunnar B Kristensen; Tom Ehlen; Nick Johnson; René H M Verheijen; Maria E L van der Burg; Angel J Lacave; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Gemma G Kenter; Antonio Casado; Cesar Mendiola; Corneel Coens; Leen Verleye; Gavin C E Stuart; Sergio Pecorelli; Nick S Reed
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Alexander Melamed; Emily M Hinchcliff; Joel T Clemmer; Amy J Bregar; Shitanshu Uppal; Ian Bostock; John O Schorge; Marcela G Del Carmen; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Comparison of survival between primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers in phase III randomised trial.

Authors:  Takashi Onda; Toyomi Satoh; Gakuto Ogawa; Toshiaki Saito; Takahiro Kasamatsu; Toru Nakanishi; Tomonori Mizutani; Kazuhiro Takehara; Aikou Okamoto; Kimio Ushijima; Hiroaki Kobayashi; Kei Kawana; Harushige Yokota; Masashi Takano; Hiroyuki Kanao; Yoh Watanabe; Kaichiro Yamamoto; Nobuo Yaegashi; Toshiharu Kamura; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer: Survey results from members of the society of gynecologic oncologists, a 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Erica Huelsmann; Israel Zighelboim; Amina Ahmed; Summer Dewdney
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-02-16
  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  In Vivo Effects of Conditioned Medium from Human Uterine Cervical Stem Cells in an Ovarian Cancer Xenograft Mouse Model.

Authors:  Juan Sendon-Lago; Samuel Seoane; Fatima Saleh; Lucia Garcia-Caballero; Maria E Arias; Noemi Eiro; Manuel Macia; Francisco J Vizoso; Roman Perez-Fernandez; Jose Schneider
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.395

2.  Clinically Interpretable Radiomics-Based Prediction of Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.

Authors:  Leonardo Rundo; Lucian Beer; Lorena Escudero Sanchez; Mireia Crispin-Ortuzar; Marika Reinius; Cathal McCague; Hilal Sahin; Vlad Bura; Roxana Pintican; Marta Zerunian; Stephan Ursprung; Iris Allajbeu; Helen Addley; Paula Martin-Gonzalez; Thomas Buddenkotte; Naveena Singh; Anju Sahdev; Ionut-Gabriel Funingana; Mercedes Jimenez-Linan; Florian Markowetz; James D Brenton; Evis Sala; Ramona Woitek
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Relationship Between Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes and Their Prognostic Role in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients With Optimal Cytoreductive Surgery.

Authors:  Yue-Min Hou; Yan Xue; Jin-Meng Yao; Fang Feng; Rui-Fang An
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Timing of surgery in patients with partial response or stable disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Nicole D Fleming; Bryan M Fellman; Larissa A Meyer; Anil K Sood; Karen H Lu; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 5.  Surgery in Advanced Ovary Cancer: Primary versus Interval Cytoreduction.

Authors:  Mackenzie Cummings; Olivia Nicolais; Mark Shahin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14

Review 6.  Emerging Trends in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Ami Patel; Puja Iyer; Shinya Matsuzaki; Koji Matsuo; Anil K Sood; Nicole D Fleming
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Effectiveness and Safety of Niraparib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer With Homologous Recombination Deficiency (NANT): Study Protocol for a Prospective, Multicenter, Exploratory, Phase 2, Single-Arm Study.

Authors:  Dongchen Zhou; Jiahao Liu; Ronghua Liu; Huayi Li; Yi Huang; Ding Ma; Li Hong; Qinglei Gao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Use of Laparoscopic and Laparotomic J-Plasma Handpiece in Gynecological Malignancies: Results From A Pilot Study in A Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Andrea Rosati; Vito Andrea Capozzi; Matteo Pavone; Alessandro Gioè; Stefano Cianci; Vito Chiantera; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Giulia Scaglione; Anna Fagotti; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.