Alba Trueba-Santiso1, Kenneth Wasmund2, Jesica M Soder-Walz1, Ernest Marco-Urrea1, Lorenz Adrian3,4. 1. Departament d'Enginyeria Química, Biològica i Ambiental, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Carrer de les Sitges s/n, Bellaterra 08193, Spain. 2. Division of Microbial Ecology, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna 1010, Austria. 3. Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany. 4. Chair of Geobiotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin 10623, Germany.
Abstract
Bacteria of the genus Dehalogenimonas respire with vicinally halogenated alkanes via dihaloelimination. We aimed to describe involved proteins and their supermolecular organization. Metagenomic sequencing of a Dehalogenimonas-containing culture resulted in a 1.65 Mbp draft genome of Dehalogenimonas alkenigignens strain BRE15M. It contained 31 full-length reductive dehalogenase homologous genes (rdhA), but only eight had cognate rdhB gene coding for membrane-anchoring proteins. Shotgun proteomics of cells grown with 1,2-dichloropropane as an electron acceptor identified 1152 proteins representing more than 60% of the total proteome. Ten RdhA proteins were detected, including a DcpA ortholog, which was the strongest expressed RdhA. Blue native gel electrophoresis (BNE) demonstrating maximum activity was localized in a protein complex of 146-242 kDa. Protein mass spectrometry revealed the presence of DcpA, its membrane-anchoring protein DcpB, two hydrogen uptake hydrogenase subunits (HupL and HupS), an iron-sulfur protein (HupX), and subunits of a redox protein with a molybdopterin-binding motif (OmeA and OmeB) in the complex. BNE after protein solubilization with different detergent concentrations revealed no evidence for an interaction between the putative respiratory electron input module (HupLS) and the OmeA/OmeB/HupX module. All detected RdhAs comigrated with the organohalide respiration complex. Based on genomic and proteomic analysis, we propose quinone-independent respiration in Dehalogenimonas.
Bacteria of the genus Dehalogenimonas respire with vicinally halogenated alkanes via dihaloelimination. We aimed to describe involved proteins and their supermolecular organization. Metagenomic sequencing of a Dehalogenimonas-containing culture resulted in a 1.65 Mbp draft genome of Dehalogenimonas alkenigignens strain BRE15M. It contained 31 full-length reductive dehalogenase homologous genes (rdhA), but only eight had cognate rdhB gene coding for membrane-anchoring proteins. Shotgun proteomics of cells grown with 1,2-dichloropropane as an electron acceptor identified 1152 proteins representing more than 60% of the total proteome. Ten RdhA proteins were detected, including a DcpA ortholog, which was the strongest expressed RdhA. Blue native gel electrophoresis (BNE) demonstrating maximum activity was localized in a protein complex of 146-242 kDa. Protein mass spectrometry revealed the presence of DcpA, its membrane-anchoring protein DcpB, two hydrogen uptake hydrogenase subunits (HupL and HupS), an iron-sulfur protein (HupX), and subunits of a redox protein with a molybdopterin-binding motif (OmeA and OmeB) in the complex. BNE after protein solubilization with different detergent concentrations revealed no evidence for an interaction between the putative respiratory electron input module (HupLS) and the OmeA/OmeB/HupX module. All detected RdhAs comigrated with the organohalide respiration complex. Based on genomic and proteomic analysis, we propose quinone-independent respiration in Dehalogenimonas.
Organohalides are common
soil and groundwater pollutants. Although
they can be naturally produced, the high concentrations found at many
industrial sites are due to improper storage or disposal practices
and represent a threat to human and environmental health because of
the toxicity or carcinogenicity of many of them.[1] A potential solution to treat sites impacted with organohalides
relies on organohalide-respiring bacteria (OHRB), which can use organohalides
as electron acceptors to harness energy and the reduction often results
in decreased toxicity of the contaminants.[2]Reductive dehalogenation is catalyzed by enzymes termed reductive
dehalogenases (RDases). Respiratory RDases in OHRB have conserved
features in their amino acid sequence including a twin arginine translocation
(TAT)-leader peptide that tags the protein for transport to and/or
across the cytoplasmic membrane, and two iron–sulfur cluster
binding motifs.[3] Almost all characterized
RDases contain a corrinoid in the active center, although corrinoid-binding
motifs have seldom been found in the amino acid sequences.[4] Typically, RDases are encoded in operons composed
by at least two genes: rdhA, encoding for the catalytically
active subunit RdhA, and rdhB encoding a putative
membrane anchor RdhB.[5] RdhA proteins are
usually located attached to the cytoplasmic membrane facing the outer
surface, indicating the need for both, the TAT-leader peptide and
the putative membrane-anchoring RdhB protein.In many OHRB,
quinones play an important role as electron carrier
between electron supplying protein complexes and the RDase (e.g.,
in Sulfurospirillum or Dehalobacter).[6] In these
cases, energy is conserved via the quinone-mediated transport of protons
across the membrane.[6] In contrast, the
genomes of the obligate OHRB Dehalococcoides spp. lack the genes for complete biosynthesis of quinones.[6−8] In quinone-independent reductive dehalogenation, energy conservation
was suggested to be coupled to the transfer of electrons from a hydrogenase
to a complex iron–sulfur molybdoenzyme (CISM).[9] Recent studies have described a quinone-independent respiratory
chain in Dehalococcoides mccartyi strain
CBDB1, catalyzed by an organohalide respiration complex (OHR
complex) that directly transfers the electrons derived from H2 oxidation by hydrogen uptake hydrogenase (Hup) via a CISM
to the RDase.[10] In this proposed scheme,
Fe–S clusters in several of the multiprotein complex subunits
act as an electron relay between hydrogenase and RDase.[9,11] According to Seidel et al.,[11] the new
nomenclature OmeA/OmeB was proposed for the CISM α- and γ-subunit,
standing for organohalide respiration-involved molybdoenzyme. HupX,
encoded in the hup operon in Dehalococcoides, interacted strongly with OmeA and OmeB, forming a tight module.
A much less strong interaction was found between the OmeA/OmeB/HupX
module and a hydrogenase module HupS/HupL.Bacteria of the genus Dehalogenimonas are obligate OHRB (class Dehalococcoidia),
and were known for their
potential to use vicinally halogenated alkanes.[12] Recently, isolated Dehalogenimonas strains have been shown to also respire with chlorinated ethenes
and benzenes.[13,14] To date, the genomes of five Dehalogenimonas strains have been sequenced: (i) Dehalogenimonas lykanthroporepellens strain BL-DC-9T,[15] (ii) Dehalogenimonas
alkenigignens strain IP3-3,[16] (iii) Dehalogenimonas strain WBC-2,[17] (iv) Dehalogenimonas formicexedens strain NSZ-14T,[18] and (v) “Candidatus Dehalogenimonas etheniformans” strain GP.[13] Only three proteins involved in organochlorine
respiration have been characterized in Dehalogenimonas spp.: (i) DcpA has been shown to dechlorinate 1,2-dichloropropane
(1,2-DCP) to propene,[19] (ii) TdrA was responsible
for the hydrogenolysis of trans-dichloroethene to
vinyl chloride,[17] and more recently, (iii)
CerA was shown to catalyze the dechlorination of vinyl chloride to
ethene.[13] The sequenced Dehalogenimonas genomes harbor 22–52 rdhA genes, and in contrast to all other known OHRB, most
of them lack colocated genes for membrane-anchoring protein cognates
(rdhB), a feature that remains unexplained.Previous work in our laboratory focused on enriching a nonmethanogenic Dehalogenimonas-containing culture from sediment
samples collected from the Besòs River estuary (Sant Adrià
de Besòs, Barcelona, Spain), which appeared to exclusively
transform vicinally halogenated alkanes via dihaloelimination.[20] The compounds transformed included 1,2-DCP,
1,2,3-trichloropropane, 1,2-dichloroethane, 1,1,2-trichloroethane,
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, and 1,2-dibromoethane.[20−23] Here, we provide biochemical
data on the molecular organization of the proteins involved in the
respiratory chain of this novel Dehalogenimonas strain. For this, we obtained a high-quality draft genome sequence
of strain BRE15M and applied a combination of proteome profiling,
blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (BNE), dehalogenation
activity assays and protein mass spectrometry. In line with recent
studies with D. mccartyi strain CBDB1,
our data suggest the existence of a quinone-independent respiratory
dehalogenase protein complex in Dehalogenimonas, thereby extending the phylogenetic occurrence of these complexes
outside of the genus Dehalococcoides.
Materials and Methods
Cultivation of the Dehalogenimonas-Containing Culture
A Dehalogenimonas-containing sediment-free culture transforming 1,2-DCP to propene
was maintained for more than 5 years in our laboratory as described
elsewhere.[20] Each microcosm contained 70
mL of an anaerobic bicarbonate-buffered medium, reduced with Na2S·9H2O and l-cysteine (0.2 mM each),
amended with 5 mM sodium acetate as carbon source, and gassed with
N2/CO2 (4:1, v/v, 0.2 bar overpressure) and
H2 (added to an overpressure of 0.4 bar). All microcosms
were cultivated under static conditions in the dark at 25 °C.
To enrich the Dehalogenimonas population,
we followed a dilution-to-extinction procedure[24] together with the addition of streptomycin (50 mg L–1) and vancomycin (5 mg L–1). Cultures
were transferred into a fresh medium with an inoculum of 10% (v/v)
after the dechlorination of two to three doses (100–500 μM)
of 1,2-DCP.For genome sequencing, 420 mL of this anaerobic
enriched culture was used growing on 1,2-DCP as the only halogenated
electron acceptor for 34 transfers (10% v/v). For proteomic studies,
cultures growing on 1,2-DCP for >42 transfers (10% v/v) were used
after the dechlorination of at least 2 mM 1,2-DCP.
Gas Chromatographic
Analysis
1,2-DCP and propene were
analyzed from headspace samples with a gas chromatograph (GC) model
6890N (Agilent Technologies; Santa Clara, USA) equipped with an HP-5
column (30 m × 0.32 mm with 0.25 μm film thickness; Agilent
Technologies) and a flame ionization detector. Helium was used as
the carrier gas (1.5 mL min–1). The injector and
detector temperatures were both set at 250 °C. After the injection
of the sample (split ratio = 2:1), the initial oven temperature (40
°C), ramped at 10 °C min–1 to 50 °C,
and then ramped at 20 °C min–1 to 120 °C.
Both compounds were identified and quantified using external chemical
standards. Nominal concentrations of 1,2-DCP and propene are expressed
as μmol per L of liquid volume or in nanomoles per bottle or
vial.
Metagenomic Sequencing and Genomic Analysis
Details
regarding cell harvesting, DNA extraction, genome sequencing, and
assembling are provided in the Supporting Information Materials and Methods section. A final automatic annotation was
performed using the MicroScope annotation pipeline.[25] Locus numbers used in this article are derived from the
MicroScope annotation. The locus numbers are prefixed with “BRE15M_v1_”
and an accompanying number, whereby the first two digits denote the
scaffold number, and the last four digits denote the gene number of
each particular scaffold. Predicted proteins were searched for signal
peptides mediating the export from the cytoplasm using SignalP-5.0.[26] Transmembrane helices were detected using TMHMM
server.[27] Subcellular location predictions
were performed using PSORTb server.[28] The
genome is available at GenBank under accession QEFQ00000000. The genome
and annotations are also publicly accessible in the MicroScope platform
(https://mage.genoscope.cns.fr/microscope/home/index.php, accession
WGS BRE15M.1).
Protein Profiling
For cell harvesting,
triplicate 140
mL samples of a 1,2-DCP dechlorinating Dehalogenimonas culture were separately centrifuged at 8000g and
10 °C to a final volume of 1 mL. A detailed protocol is provided
in the Supporting Information Materials
and Methods section. Cells were lyzed by freeze–thawing (−20
°C/+20 °C, 6×) and sonication for 30 s. The samples
were then concentrated by ultrafiltration with Amicon Ultra 0.5 mL
centrifugal filter units with a 10 kDa cutoff (Millipore) at 14,000g for 30 min at 10 °C. After centrifugation, filters
were turned upside down and the protein extract was spun off for 2
min at 1000g, 10 °C. Protein concentrations
in the obtained samples were quantified by the Bradford method. All
triplicate samples were then processed by in-solution digestions for
nano-liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (nLC–MS/MS)
as described below.
Blue Native Gel Electrophoresis
For each BNE gel, 140
mL samples of a 1,2-DCP dechlorinating Dehalogenimonas culture were centrifuged as described above. One milliliter of aliquoted
concentrated cells was centrifuged again at 9000g for 20 min and 800 μL of the supernatant was removed. Then,
1× PBS buffer (pH 7.2) was added to a final volume of 600 μL.
Cell density was quantified at this point by direct epifluorescence
microscopic cell counting on slides covered with agarose as previously
described.[29] Then, cells were lysed by
a bead beater (FastPrep FP120, Thermo) at speed 4 m s–1, in six cycles of 40 s beating alternated with 1 min resting in
ice. Membrane proteins were solubilized by adding n-dodecyl β-d-maltoside (DDM) to a concentration of
0.05, 0.1, or 1% w/v, and incubating the samples at 10 °C for
1 h with gentle shaking under anaerobic conditions. After DDM incubation,
samples were centrifuged at 16,600g for 45 min at
4 °C. The supernatant (DDM-solubilized protein extract) was amended
with 0.125% w/v Coomassie G-250 additive and loaded in triplicate
wells (25 μL/well) onto a precasted 4–16% gradient Bis-Tris
gel (NativePAGE Novex, Invitrogen) and run inside an anaerobic glove
box, maintaining the BNE system in contact with ice packs. Light blue
cathode buffer and anode buffer were prepared following the manufacturer’s
instructions, degassed, and cooled down to 4 °C before the electrophoresis
was started. NativeMark Unstained Protein Standard (Invitrogen) was
used as protein ladder. Electrophoresis was run at 150 V for 60 min,
and then at 200 V for 30 min more. Once the electrophoresis was finished,
one of the replicate lanes and the protein ladder lane were cut from
the gel using a scalpel and the protein bands were stained for visualization
by a short silver staining method.[30] The
rest of the gel was stored in anode buffer at 4 °C.
Dehalogenase
Activity Assays
To test RDase enzyme activity,
specific assays were set-up inside an anoxic glove box.[31] Anoxic 10 mL glass vials were used, containing
2 mL of an assay buffer with 200 mM potassium acetate buffer (pH 5.8),
2 mM methyl viologen, and 2 mM titanium(III) citrate [2 mM in respect
to titanium(III)] and amended with 200 μM of 1,2-DCP. For the
whole-cell activity assays, 200 μL of a cell concentrate (109 to 1010 cells mL–1) were inoculated
to each assay vial. These experiments were performed in triplicates.To measure activity in BNE gels, a nonstained lane from the BNE
was cut into slices using a steel scalpel. Each slice was introduced
into a 2 mL assay vial. Slices were smashed into smaller pieces to
better expose proteins to the assay buffer. The vials were closed
with Teflon-coated rubber septa and aluminum crimps and amended with
1,2-DCP from a 1 mM acetone stock solution with a glass syringe (Hamilton)
to a final concentration of 200 μM 1,2-DCP.For each activity
measurement from BNE gels, different controls
were included. As a positive control, 25 μL of the crude protein
extract were added to the assay buffer instead of a slice. Also, controls
with either 25 μL supernatant of the solubilized protein extract
or the remaining pellet after solubilization were included to evaluate
the efficiency of the membrane protein extraction. To control for
abiotic transformation of 1,2-DCP, parallel negative controls containing
the assay buffer (i) without cells or gel slices from outside the
area where proteins were loaded and (ii) with 25 μL of crude
extract but no 1,2-DCP was included to test the production of propene
from other sources than 1,2-DCP. All controls were performed in triplicate.The activity test vials were thoroughly mixed and incubated upside
down inside the glove box, at 30 °C without shaking. After 24
h, the headspace of each sample was analyzed for propene production
by gas chromatography.
Protein Identification
Silver stained
bands were cut
from BNE gels, the bands were washed with ddH2O and destained
in a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of 30 mM K3[Fe(CN)6]
and 100 mM Na2O3S2. Destained BNE
bands and in-solution samples were treated as described previously
to reduce and alkylate cysteine residues.[11] Protein digestion from both in gel and in-solution samples was done
overnight at 37 °C on a shaker after the addition of 0.1 μg
of porcine trypsin (Proteomics Sequencing Grade, Promega). The obtained
peptides were extracted from the slices by 10 min incubation in a
solution containing formic acid 5% (v/v) and acetonitrile 50% (v/v)
three times and afterward extracts were combined. Extracts from both
in gel and in-solution samples were dried, resolubilized in 0.1% of
formic acid solution, and desalted using ZipTip-μC18 material
(Merck Millipore).Peptides were analyzed by nLC–MS/MS
on a nanoUPLC system (nanoAcquity, Waters) hyphenated via a TriVersa
NanoMate (Advion, Ltd., Harlow, UK) to an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer
(Thermo Scientific) as described previously.[11] Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase from Staphylococcus
aureus was used as internal standard and was added
to the gel slices before derivatization.Peptide identification
was conducted by Proteome Discoverer (v2.2,
Thermo Fisher Scientific) using SequestHT as a search engine and a
FASTA-file of proteins from the draft genome of the Dehalogenimonas strain in the culture as a database.
False discovery rates for peptide identification of 1% was set as
threshold, calculated versus a decoy database using the percolator
node. Label free quantification of the detected proteins was performed
with the abundance value obtained from Proteome Discoverer Minora
node. The relative protein abundance in this study was defined as
the abundance of a protein in one slice relative to the total abundance
of this protein across all slices of the BNE gel lane. To detect the
selenocysteine residue in OmeA different versions of the protein with
a selenocysteine, a cysteine, or a serine instead of the TGA stop
codon were added to the database and the search algorithm was adapted
to detect selenocysteine as a modification of cysteine. Results were
confirmed by manually examining the respective MS2 spectra.
Results
Draft
Genome Sequence of D. alkenigignens BRE15M
Metagenome sequencing was performed on DNA extracted
from the enrichment culture to investigate the genomic properties
of the Dehalogenimonas strain and to
allow for further proteomic studies. A high-quality draft genome of
a Dehalogenimonas sp. was obtained
consisting of a total of 1,654,503 bp within 18 contigs, a GC content
of 56.3%, and containing 1795 predicted protein coding genes, all
similar to reported Dehalogenimonas genomes (Table S1). CheckM results indicated
that the genome was 97.8% complete with no contamination (0%).[32] In line with previous 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA)
gene sequencing of cultures from this enrichment,[20] the 16S rRNA gene of the Dehalogenimonas genome was 100% identical to the 16S rRNA gene of D. alkenigignens strain IP3-3, suggesting the strain
in our culture belongs to the species D. alkenigignens. Average nucleotide identity (gANI) of the whole genome to D. alkenigignens strain IP3-3 showed 98.7% ANIb (BLASTN)
identities from approximately 92% of the regions that aligned. We
denominated our strain D. alkenigignens strain BRE15M. The close similarity with D. alkenigignens was further supported by phylogenetic analysis of concatenated protein
sequences derived single copy marker genes (Figure ). Reciprocal BLASTP analyses of protein
sequences from D. alkenigignens strains
BRE15M and IP3-3 suggested no major functional differences exist between
the strains (Supporting Information Results
section).
Figure 1
Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of D.
alkenigignens strain BRE15M to other strains of Dehalogenimonas and D. mccartyi strain 195 using a phylogenomic approach. Phylogenetic analysis
was performed using an alignment of concatenated protein sequences
of 34 single copy marker genes from CheckM analyses.[32] The tree was constructed using default parameters using
FastTree (version 2.1.10).[33] The scale
bar represents 5% sequence divergence. GenBank accession numbers are
in parentheses.
Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of D.
alkenigignens strain BRE15M to other strains of Dehalogenimonas and D. mccartyi strain 195 using a phylogenomic approach. Phylogenetic analysis
was performed using an alignment of concatenated protein sequences
of 34 single copy marker genes from CheckM analyses.[32] The tree was constructed using default parameters using
FastTree (version 2.1.10).[33] The scale
bar represents 5% sequence divergence. GenBank accession numbers are
in parentheses.The genome contains 31 full-length rdhA genes
that were not truncated by contig breaks, while two additional partial rdhA (BRE15M_v1_070029 and BRE15M_v1_150066; in the following
section the MicroScope gene locus tag “BRE15M_v1” will
be omitted) were apparently truncated because of being at contig break.
Only eight rdhA had cognate genes for membrane-anchoring
proteins encoded directly adjacent to the rdhA (Table S2). In total, six rdhB were automatically predicted, and we manually identified three additional
possible rdhB that were adjacent to rdhA and encoded proteins with transmembrane helixes that may anchor
RdhA proteins into membranes (Table S3, Figure S1). Interestingly, one rdhB gene (_030121) was found at a locus where no rdhA was present, the closest being over 22 kbp away. This brought into
question whether the encoded protein may be functional as an RdhB.
We therefore searched for closest homologs of this protein in other
Dehalococcoidia. Although the closest homologs to this RdhB in other Dehalogenimonas spp. were also not adjacently encoded
to an rdhA gene, several homologs with >80% amino
acid identity in multiple D. mccartyi strains (CBDB1, DCMB5 and VS) harbored an adjacently encoded RdhA.
Together this suggests locus _030121 encodes a functional RdhB.The genome encoded various uptake and cytoplasmic hydrogenases,
formate dehydrogenases and a possible OHR complex, similar to previously
described in Dehalococcoides spp.[9,11] No genes for biosynthesis of quinones or cytochromes were found.
Further details regarding gene annotations and protein properties
are presented in the Supporting Information Results section.
Proteome Profiling
The shotgun proteomic
analysis of
strain BRE15M grown with 1,2-DCP identified a total of 1152 proteins,
which represented the 64% of the annotated proteins in strain BRE15M
(Table S12). A total of 10 RDases were
expressed in strain BRE15M when grown with 1,2-DCP (Tables and S12). The most abundantly expressed RDase (_160008) was an ortholog
of the RDase DcpA, which catalyzes reduction of 1,2-DCP to propene
in D. mccartyi, Dehalogenimonas and uncultured bacteria. The RDase _160008 had >90% amino acid
sequence
identity to DcpA (Table S13).[19] The second most abundant RDase (_160007) is
encoded adjacently to the DcpA ortholog and its putative membrane-anchoring
protein DcpB (_160009) (Figure S2). Interestingly,
_160007 is one of the four RDases which lacks the TAT signal peptide
and has a predicted cytoplasmic location according to Phobius[34] (Table S2).
Table 1
List of RdhA Proteins Detected in
Full Protein Extracts of D. alkenigignens Strain BRE15M Grown with 1,2-DCP as Only Halogenated Substrate for
More Than 35 Transfersa
replicate 1
replicate 2
replicate 3
accession
abundance
rank
abundance
rank
abundance
rank
BRE15M_v1_160008 (DcpA)
7.34 × 107
88
2.40 × 108
10
3.44 × 108
7
BRE15M_vl_160007
4.55 × 107
134
7.95 × 107
41
1.32 × 108
30
BRE15M_v1_40117
3.46 × 107
162
1.19 × 107
375
BRE15M_v1_30017
2.17 × 107
246
1.27 × 107
276
1.77 × 107
300
BRE15M_v1_10074
5.44 × 106
435
1.32 × 107
348
BRE15M_v1_150026
6.46 × 105
808
2.51 × 106
583
2.99 × 106
654
BRE15M_v1_30093
1.11 × 106
724
BRE15M_v1_30016
2.48 × 106
622
5.84 × 105
823
1.34 × 105
1086
BRE15M_v1_30086
1.22 × 105
896
9.75 × 104
940
1.82 × 106
746
BRE15M_v1_170013
9.49 × 104
1100
protein concentration in the
sample in mg/mL
6.9
2.14
5.08
number of detected proteins
901
947
1114
sum of abundances of all detected proteins
2.74 × 1010
1.84 × 1010
2.61 × 1010
The rank columns
show the rank of
a protein relative to all proteins in that sample, calculated from
the abundance values. Empty cells indicate that a protein was not
detected in this replicate.
The rank columns
show the rank of
a protein relative to all proteins in that sample, calculated from
the abundance values. Empty cells indicate that a protein was not
detected in this replicate.A membrane-bound [NiFe] hydrogenase (HupL/HupS, _070001, _070002),
was expressed at high abundance (absolute abundance > 106) as described for D. mccartyi strains.[9,11,35] Also other proteins reported
to be part of the OHR complex: OmeA (_040002/_040003), HupX (_040001)
and OmeB (_130001)[9,11] were detected in each of the
protein extract triplicates of strain BRE15M with >106 abundance.
None of the few annotated genes involved in heme or quinone biosynthesis
were expressed, further supporting the conclusion that strain BRE15M
is independent from cytochromes and quinones. Finally, heterodisulfide
reductase A and B subunits (_010277 and _010278) were expressed in
strain BRE15M, proteins that are not encoded in D.
mccartyi strains.[13]
Detection
of the OHR Complex of Strain BRE15M by BNE
When membrane
proteins of strain BRE15M were solubilized in 1% DDM
without an additional cell disruption step and separated by BNE, dehalogenating
activity was detected in gel slices corresponding to a molecular mass
range between 146 and 242 kDa (Table S14). The activity produced low amounts of propene from 1,2-DCP by dichloroelimination.
No defined bands were observed in the gel after silver staining (not
shown), and most of the dehalogenating activity detected in the controls
remained in the pellet control (390.14 ± 1.77 nmol propene),
compared to the protein extract supernatant (146.93 ± 0.75 nmol
propene). Together, this indicated inefficient protein extraction
(Table S14).Next, cell disruption
by bead beating combined with solubilization with three different
DDM concentrations was tested (0.05, 0.1 and 1% DDM). The detailed
conditions for these experiments are shown in Table S15. The resolution of the protein bands in the native
gel was different among the three conditions tested (Figure ). With 0.05% DDM, the observed
bands were very weak and blurry. On the contrary, in 1.0% DDM bands
were defined and intense, however, the bottom part of the gel (lower
molecular weight) repeatedly showed a blue Coomassie accumulation
that impeded the visualization of the bands located below. With 0.1%
DDM bands were well defined along the whole lane. Parallel unstained
gel lanes with the three DDM concentrations were cut into six slices
each, following the stained molecular mass ruler marks and each section
was subjected to a dehalogenase enzyme activity test with 1,2-DCP
as electron acceptor. Propene was detected in all gel slices corresponding
to a molecular weight of 146–242 kDa in the three gel lanes.
Activity was also detected in gel slices at 242–480 kDa in
gels with 0.1 and 1% DDM, and at 66–146 kDa in the gel with
0.1% DDM (Figure ).
Overall, a slight shift of the reductive dehalogenation activity toward
higher molecular weight fractions was observed at higher DDM concentration.
Notably, maximum dehalogenating activity was detected in the molecular
weight range between 146 and 242 kDa with 0.1% DDM (Figure ). Dehalogenating activity
was never detected below 66 kDa in any of the experiments, indicating
that monomeric RdhA protein (∼50 kDa) was part of a higher
molecular mass respiratory complex or that it lost its activity as
a monomeric enzyme.
Figure 2
Distribution of dehalogenating activity in BNE with protein
membrane
samples of strain BRE15M solubilized with 0.05, 0.1 or 1% (w/v) DDM
after lysis by bead beating. Dehalogenating activity was measured
in nanomoles of propene produced from 1,2-DCP after 24 h of incubation.
Data shows means of duplicate cultures ±SD. Dehalogenating activity
in the corresponding controls is shown in Table S14.
Distribution of dehalogenating activity in BNE with protein
membrane
samples of strain BRE15M solubilized with 0.05, 0.1 or 1% (w/v) DDM
after lysis by bead beating. Dehalogenating activity was measured
in nanomoles of propene produced from 1,2-DCP after 24 h of incubation.
Data shows means of duplicate cultures ±SD. Dehalogenating activity
in the corresponding controls is shown in Table S14.To narrow down the molecular range
of the maximum dehalogenating
activity, two replicate gel lanes with 0.1% DDM were cut into slices
of ∼2 mm across the mass range of 63–490 kDa and were
subjected to activity assays (Figure ). Maximum activity was detected in slices VI and VII
in both gels, corresponding to molecular weights of 179–229
kDa. These results strongly support the presence of a organohalide
respiratory complex in strain BRE15M.
Figure 3
Distribution of dehalogenating activity
in BNE with protein samples
of strain BRE15M solubilized with 0.1% (w/v) DDM after lysis by bead
beating. Dehalogenating activity was measured as nmol propene derived
from 1,2-DCP dihaloelimination detected in enzyme assays within gel
slices. Data shows means of duplicate culture samples ±SD. Molecular
weight ranges were estimated from gel images using Image Lab software.
“M”: protein molecular mass marker.
Distribution of dehalogenating activity
in BNE with protein samples
of strain BRE15M solubilized with 0.1% (w/v) DDM after lysis by bead
beating. Dehalogenating activity was measured as nmol propene derived
from 1,2-DCP dihaloelimination detected in enzyme assays within gel
slices. Data shows means of duplicate culture samples ±SD. Molecular
weight ranges were estimated from gel images using Image Lab software.
“M”: protein molecular mass marker.
Mass Spectrometric Analysis of BNE Slices
Each of the
six analyzed regions of the stained gels with 0.05, 0.1 and 1% DDM
were subjected to in-gel trypsin digestion and subsequently analyzed
by nLC–MS/MS. The number of unambiguously identified proteins
for each gel region ranged from 175 to 966 (Figure S3). Thirteen RdhA paralogs were detected in the gel experiment
treated with 0.05% DDM, 10 with 0.1% DDM and 9 with 1% DDM (Tables S16–S18). In accordance with the
production of propene detected in the in-gel dehalogenating activity
tests, the DcpA ortholog predicted to be involved in 1,2-DCP dihaloelimination
was abundantly detected in gel regions from the molecular range 146–242
kDa (Figure S4). Interestingly, the RDase
with locus tag _160007 was the most abundant RDase expressed in the
slices with maximum dechlorinating activity in the gels with 0.1 and
0.05% (Figure S4).In addition to
RDases, we detected several other proteins in the gel slices in which
the OHR complex was detected (full lists are given in Tables S16–S18). The DcpA ortholog and
the RDase with the locus tag _160007 comigrated with the two hydrogenase
subunits HupS and HupL, the OmeA, the putative membrane-integrated
anchor OmeB, and the four-FeS cluster protein HupX, in gel regions
that showed maximum in-gel dehalogenating activity (regions 3–4
in proteins solubilized with 1% DDM, and region 3 in proteins solubilized
with 0.05 or 0.1% DDM) (Figures and 4). These eight proteins
showed a clear maximum of relative protein abundance in region 3 in
the gel with 0.1% DDM-extracted proteins.
Figure 4
Relative abundance of
proteins predicted to be associated with
the OHR complex at different molecular weights in BNE gels after solubilization
of strain BRE15M cells at different concentrations of DDM (panel A:
1% DDM, panel B: 0.1% DDM, panel C: 0.05% DDM).
Relative abundance of
proteins predicted to be associated with
the OHR complex at different molecular weights in BNE gels after solubilization
of strain BRE15M cells at different concentrations of DDM (panel A:
1% DDM, panel B: 0.1% DDM, panel C: 0.05% DDM).Only one RdhB protein was identified with a single peptide in 0.1
and 1% DDMBNE slices being colocalized with the DcpA ortholog (Figure A,B). This RdhB protein
with the locus tag _160009 is encoded in the same operon as DcpA in
strain BRE15M (Figure S2) and shares 88%
sequence identity (e-value 3 × 10–40) with the DcpB (locus tag Dehly_1525) in D. lykanthroporepellens strain BL-DC-9, predicted to function as a membrane anchor for DcpA.
Interestingly, the topology of DcpB in strain BRE15M differs from
the majority of the RdhB reported so far, with two predicted transmembrane
regions instead of three (Figure S1). In
summary, the identified proteins constitute the putative subunits
of the OHR complex in strain BRE15M, and appear to functionally correspond
with the subunits recently described for the OHR complex in D. mccartyi strain CBDB1.After determining
protein composition in broad gel bands, we also
determined the presence of proteins within single defined bands (∼2
mm). For that we ran a sample on a BNE gel with proteins solubilized
with 1% DDM, stained the gel with a silver protocol and analyzed dominant
protein bands by nLC–MS/MS (Figure S5A, Table S19). As shown in Figure A, the RDases (catalytic subunit
DcpA, and the RDase with locus tag _160007), the OmeA, the membrane
subunit OmeB and the membrane-associated protein HupX were detected
in the band VII (242 kDa). The membrane anchor DcpB colocalized with
DcpA in band VI (202 kDa). The HupLS complex had its maximum relative
abundance in band V (176 kDa). To date, it is unknown how protons
are pumped across the membrane in D. mccartyi strains, but Seidel et al. (2018)[11] found
that a protein annotated as a K+-insensitive pyrophosphate
energized proton pump (HppA) colocalized with the OmeA/OmeB/HupX module
across BNE gels in D. mccartyi strain
CBDB1. Interestingly, we detected the homologous HppA protein (_080016)
with a maximum of relative protein abundance in band VII (Figure A), which coincides
with the OmeA/OmeB/HupX module. Potentially supporting this physical
association, the hppA gene was encoded within the
same gene neighborhood as the omeA and hupX genes in Dehalogenimonas strains BRE15M and IP3-3.
Figure 5
Relative abundance
of proteins associated with the OHR complex
at different molecular weights in BNE gels after solubilization of
strain BRE15M cells at 1% DDM (panel A), 0.1% DDM (panel B), and 0.05%
DDM (panel C).
Relative abundance
of proteins associated with the OHR complex
at different molecular weights in BNE gels after solubilization of
strain BRE15M cells at 1% DDM (panel A), 0.1% DDM (panel B), and 0.05%
DDM (panel C).The same procedure was followed
for dominant protein bands in a
silver-stained gel lane with 0.1% DDM-solubilized proteins focusing
on the region 66–480 kDa (Figure S5B). All of the proteins suspected to be part of the respiratory complex
were detected in band VII (205–229 kDa) with the exception
of DcpB, and in band VI (179–205 kDa) with the exception of
DcpB and HupS (Figure B, Table S20). These bands VI and VII
corresponded to the unstained parallel gel slices with highest dehalogenating
activity (Figure ).
HupL had its maximum of relative protein abundance in band VI (179
kDa), yet HupLS are detected together in band VII, which prevented
the categorical assumption of an independent hydrogenase module. A
remarkable observation was again the colocalization of the DcpB ortholog
with its respective DcpA in band IV (139 kDa) in a region where HupX
and OmeA were absent.Finally, a BNE gel lane with proteins
extracted with 0.05% DDM
was analyzed (Figure S5C, Table S21). No RDase activity was detected in any of the 19
gel slices picked from the parallel unstained gel. All subunits of
the complex described above, apart from DcpB, were again identified
in the excised silver stained bands. However, the distribution of
the relative protein abundance across the gel lane pointed to the
presence of three modules (Figure C). The two subunits of the Hup complex exhibited identical
migration patterns and shared a clear maximum relative abundance in
band V (123 kDa) (Figure C), which coincides well with the predicted molecular weight
of the dimer of HupL/HupS (93.9 kDa). This observation strengthens
the hypothesis that HupL and HupS form a hydrogenase module also in Dehalogenimonas strains. The DcpA ortholog and the
RdhA with locus tag _160007 had a similar migration pattern. Unlike
the protein distribution observed in gels with the 1% DDM or 0.1%
DDM solubilized proteins, both RdhA were found in all 19 slices, but
never more than 20% of relative abundance. Similarly, the putative
proton pump protein HppA was broadly distributed across the gel. As
noted earlier, RdhB proteins were not detected from 0.05% DDM treatments,
suggesting the need of a higher detergent concentration to detach
this protein from membrane or from the complex. The OmeA/OmeB/HupX
module reached its maximum of relative protein abundance in band XVIII
(450–480 kDa), and they comigrated in the molecular range between
320 and 480 kDa (bands XV to XIX). This indicated that they were tightly
connected to each other. Together, these results indicate weak interaction
between the OmeA/OmeB/HupX module and the HupL/HupS module but strong
interactions within the modules. The lack of dehalogenating activity
in the different slices of this gel indicates the need of a full multimeric
complex to proceed with organohalide respiration, rather than the
RdhA catalytic subunit alone.Based on these results, we propose
a respiratory complex for strain
BRE15M that includes subunits of the CISM complex, subunits of the
Hup hydrogenase, and RDase subunits (Figure ).
Figure 6
Model of the OHR complex of D.
alkenigignens strain BRE15M. The proteins found throughout
this study to be part
of the suspected multimeric respiratory complex are the organohalide
respiration involved molybdoenzyme OmeA (locus tag _040002/_040003),
and its membrane-anchoring subunit OmeB (_130001), the hydrogenase
large subunit HupL (_070001), and its small subunit HupS (_070002),
the HupX (_040001), the RDase DcpA (_160008), and its putative membrane-anchor
DcpB (_160009).
Model of the OHR complex of D.
alkenigignens strain BRE15M. The proteins found throughout
this study to be part
of the suspected multimeric respiratory complex are the organohalide
respiration involved molybdoenzyme OmeA (locus tag _040002/_040003),
and its membrane-anchoring subunit OmeB (_130001), the hydrogenase
large subunit HupL (_070001), and its small subunit HupS (_070002),
the HupX (_040001), the RDase DcpA (_160008), and its putative membrane-anchor
DcpB (_160009).
Discussion
The
draft genome sequence of strain BRE15M provides a basis to
study its proteome profile and allowed for a characterization of its
organohalide respiratory system. Annotation of the genome sequence
excluded the possibility that organohalide respiration is quinone-mediated
in Dehalogenimonas because no functional
cytochromes or biosynthetic pathways for quinones were encoded. The
genome encoded 31 full-length rdhA, 22 of which were
detected in our proteomic experiments (Table S2), even though 1,2-DCP was the only halogenated electron acceptor
in the medium. The two most abundant RdhA proteins (DcpA ortholog
and _160007) are encoded together in one operon and were colocalized
across the gels regardless of the DDM concentration. To date, DcpA
was the only RdhA for which a 1,2-DCP dihaloelimination function was
assigned.[19] However, in our study the RDase
_160007 was detected at even higher abundances than DcpA in gels with
proteins solubilized with 0.1 and 0.05% DDM (Figure S4). Further comparative proteomic studies with strain BRE15M
growing with different electron acceptors can elucidate whether the
RdhA _160007 is specifically induced by 1,2-DCP or, instead, whether
its expression is either broadly induced or even constitutive. Constitutive
expression of RdhA in OHRB is common, as illustrated by the dehalogenase
CbdbA80 in D. mccartyi strain CBDB1.[36] The colocalization in the genome as well as
in gel slices of these two RdhA may suggest either strong interaction,
or that they are performing the same function in different copies
of the respiratory complex. These results are nevertheless intriguing
because RdhA _160007 does not have a TAT leader peptide. Further,
no RdhA sequences from strain BRE15M contained predicted multiple
transmembrane helix domains that might directly anchor them to membranes,
as was recently described in other genomes.[37−39] One possibility
is that both RDases are exported together as a heterodimer via the
TAT machinery associated with the DcpA, and once in the outer part
of the membrane, _160007 is either attached to a different copy of
the DcpB or remains attached to DcpA forming a stable heterodimer
in vivo. This hypothesis would assume that one RdhB protein can anchor
different RdhA proteins to the membrane. If this is true, the four
RdhA proteins without TAT leader peptide encoded in the genome might
be anchored to one of the nine encoded RdhB, forming heterodimers
with other RdhAs. This may occur even if the RdhA protein without
TAT leader peptide is not encoded in the same operons as another RdhA
protein. Alternatively, a feasible explanation for the lack of TAT
leader peptide is that a RdhA protein might function as a cytoplasmatic
nonrespiratory dehalogenase, as reported for aerobic bacteria[5,37] and that the association with the OHR complex is an artifact after
cell disruption.In this study, we also provide biochemical
evidence that RDases
in strain BRE15M are part of a large respiratory complex. The nonionic
detergent DDM was suitable to detach membrane associated proteins
while maintaining protein–protein interactions. Protein solubilization
with 0.1% (w/v) DDM enabled the identification of a putative multiprotein
complex composed by subunits of the CISM complex, a dimeric [NiFe]
hydrogenase, and the RDase system in one single gel slice that was
at a position in the gel with maximum dechlorination activity within
the measured gel lane. Our results with lower DDM concentration (0.05%)
were surprisingly counterintuitive because it led to partial disintegration
of the protein complex. This might be explained by the fact that the
ionic protein–protein interactions within the complex are not
affected by this nonionic detergent, but they may disrupt lipid–protein
interactions of membrane proteins. In contrast, increasing concentrations
of DDM might drive the protein subunits to move together, as high
salt pushes hydrophobic interaction together.The analysis of
the complexome using 0.05% (w/v) DDM, where the
complex partially disintegrates, strongly suggests the presence of
three modules. The largest module comprised OmeA, OmeB and HupX. The
calculated size of this module of 180.9 kDa did not match with the
molecular mass corresponding with the gel slice in which these proteins
had its relative maximum abundance (band XVIII, Figure C, 450 kDa), suggesting that the Ome/HupX
module polymerizes. As observed from the distribution of 0.05% DDM-solubilized
proteins across the gel, HupX had a much stronger interaction with
OmeA and OmeB than with the two hydrogenase subunits, which agrees
with previous results with D. mccartyi strain CBDB1.[11] However, a noticeable
difference between these two strains is that HupX is encoded in an
operon together with HupL and HupS in D. mccartyi strain CBDB1,[10] while it forms an operon
with OmeA and OmeB in strain BRE15M, further supporting its role as
the four iron–sulfur cluster β-subunit of the CISM module.
We also biochemically detected a protein annotated as K+-insensitive pyrophosphate energized proton pump (HppA) that migrates
similarly to the OmeA/OmeB/HupX module in a BNE gel with 0.1% DDM-solubilized
proteins. However, the broad distribution of HppA across the bands
in BNE gels with 0.05% DDM questions any strong interaction between
HppA and the OmeA/OmeB/HupX module but provides a basis to speculate
that HppA could be part of the respiratory complex of strain BRE15M
and may translocate protons through the subunits of this complex.The hydrogenase subunits HupL and HupS constitute another defined
module and its facile separation from the other OHR complex subunits
has also been observed in D. mccartyi strain CBDB1.[11] The molecular weight
range in which the maximum relative protein abundance of these subunits
was detected is 159–179 kDa in the 0.1% DDM treatment (band
V) and 123–146 kDa in the 0.05% DDM treatment (band V), which
slightly differs from the theoretical calculated size of 93.9 kDa
for this module, however, size determinations in BNE gels can only
considered as rough estimations. Finally, the RDase DcpA, which functioned
as terminal reductase in the respiratory complex, is attached to the
putative membrane anchor DcpB. We detected comigration of both proteins
in BNE gels loaded with proteins solubilized with 1% DDM (band VI,
202 kDa, Figure A)
and 0.1% DDM (band IV, 139 kDa, Figure B). These results constitute, together with a recent
study with D. mccartyi strain CBDB1,
one of the few biochemical evidences of specific interaction between
an RdhA and its corresponding RdhB.[10]
Authors: J Palau; R Yu; S Hatijah Mortan; O Shouakar-Stash; M Rosell; D L Freedman; C Sbarbati; S Fiorenza; R Aravena; E Marco-Urrea; M Elsner; A Soler; D Hunkeler Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: José Juan Almagro Armenteros; Konstantinos D Tsirigos; Casper Kaae Sønderby; Thomas Nordahl Petersen; Ole Winther; Søren Brunak; Gunnar von Heijne; Henrik Nielsen Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Lorenz Adrian; Sigrid K Hansen; Jennifer M Fung; Helmut Görisch; Stephen H Zinder Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2007-04-01 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: L Martín-González; S Hatijah Mortan; M Rosell; E Parladé; M Martínez-Alonso; N Gaju; G Caminal; L Adrian; E Marco-Urrea Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Tina Hölscher; Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown; Kirsti M Ritalahti; Friedrich Von Wintzingerode; Helmut Görisch; Frank E Löffler; Lorenz Adrian Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Elizabeth Padilla-Crespo; Jun Yan; Cynthia Swift; Darlene D Wagner; Karuna Chourey; Robert L Hettich; Kirsti M Ritalahti; Frank E Löffler Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Trent A Key; Dray P Richmond; Kimberly S Bowman; Yong-Joon Cho; Jongsik Chun; Milton S da Costa; Fred A Rainey; William M Moe Journal: Stand Genomic Sci Date: 2016-06-23
Authors: Gao Chen; Fadime Kara Murdoch; Yongchao Xie; Robert W Murdoch; Yiru Cui; Yi Yang; Jun Yan; Trent A Key; Frank E Löffler Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 5.005
Authors: Danielle L Sexton; Gao Chen; Fadime Kara Murdoch; Ameena Hashimi; Frank E Löffler; Elitza I Tocheva Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2021-11-17 Impact factor: 5.005