Literature DB >> 32974871

Looking with the (computer) mouse: How to unveil problem-solving strategies in matrix reasoning without eye-tracking.

Guillaume Rivollier1,2, Jean-Charles Quinton3, Corentin Gonthier4, Annique Smeding5.   

Abstract

Problem-solving strategies in visual reasoning tasks are often studied based on the analysis of eye movements, which yields high-quality data but is costly and difficult to implement on a large scale. We devised a new graphical user interface for matrix reasoning tasks where the analysis of computer mouse movements makes it possible to investigate item exploration and, in turn, problem-solving strategies. While relying on the same active perception principles underlying eye-tracking (ET) research, this approach has the additional advantages of being user-friendly and easy to implement in real-world testing conditions, and records only voluntary decisions. A pilot study confirmed that embedding items of Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM) in the interface did not significantly alter its psychometric properties. Experiment 1 indicated that mouse-based exploration indices, when used to assess two major problem-solving strategies in the APM, are related to final performance-as has been found in past ET research. Experiment 2 suggested that constraining some features of the interface favored the adoption of the more efficient solving strategy for some participants. Overall, the findings support the relevance of the present methodology for accessing and manipulating problem-solving strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active perception; Computer mouse movements; Graphical user interface; Matrix reasoning; Strategy use

Year:  2020        PMID: 32974871     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01484-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  14 in total

1.  A general framework and an R package for the detection of dichotomous differential item functioning.

Authors:  David Magis; Sébastien Béland; Francis Tuerlinckx; Paul De Boeck
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-08

2.  Working memory and intelligence: the same or different constructs?

Authors:  Phillip L Ackerman; Margaret E Beier; Mary O Boyle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  What one intelligence test measures: a theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test.

Authors:  P A Carpenter; M A Just; P Shell
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  A Perceptual Pathway to Bias: Interracial Exposure Reduces Abrupt Shifts in Real-Time Race Perception That Predict Mixed-Race Bias.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Kristin Pauker; Diana T Sanchez
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-03-14

5.  Calorie Labeling Promotes Dietary Self-Control by Shifting the Temporal Dynamics of Health- and Taste-Attribute Integration in Overweight Individuals.

Authors:  Seung-Lark Lim; Molly T Penrod; Oh-Ryeong Ha; Jared M Bruce; Amanda S Bruce
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-01-25

6.  MouseTracker: software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-02

Review 7.  Predictions not commands: active inference in the motor system.

Authors:  Rick A Adams; Stewart Shipp; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.270

8.  Complexity and compositionality in fluid intelligence.

Authors:  John Duncan; Daphne Chylinski; Daniel J Mitchell; Apoorva Bhandari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Hand in motion reveals mind in motion.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Rick Dale; Thomas A Farmer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-20

10.  Evaluation of the Tobii EyeX Eye tracking controller and Matlab toolkit for research.

Authors:  Agostino Gibaldi; Mauricio Vanegas; Peter J Bex; Guido Maiello
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  The Effects of Intent, Outcome, and Causality on Moral Judgments and Decision Processes.

Authors:  Aurore Gaboriaud; Flora Gautheron; Jean-Charles Quinton; Annique Smeding
Journal:  Psychol Belg       Date:  2022-07-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.