| Literature DB >> 32971957 |
Cosmin Tudoroniu1, Monica Popa1, Simona Maria Iacob2, Anca Lucia Pop3, Bogdana Adriana Năsui1.
Abstract
Background and objectives: The primary oral disease during adolescence is dental caries. Less is known about the caries prevalence, oral health behavior, and sweets nutritional habits in Romanian adolescents. The objective of this study was to assess the actual caries prevalence among Romanian adolescents in a representative area of Romania, Cluj, and to correlate with oral hygiene behaviors and dietary sugary foods intake. Materials and methods: We have done a cross-sectional study of 650 adolescents aged 10 to 19-years-old (average age 15.3 ± 2.8). We performed the oral dental examination according to the WHO methodology, calculated the number of decayed, missing (due to caries), and filled teeth (DMFT index), assessed the oral hygiene and dietary behaviors using a two-section valid questionnaire and statistically analyzed the interrelation between DMFT, oral hygiene and eating behaviors by multivariate statistical analysis.Entities:
Keywords: DMFT; adolescents; dental health; diet; oral health behaviors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32971957 PMCID: PMC7558728 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17186923
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Reporting flow diagram (guideline).
Oral hygiene behaviors of the studied group.
| Dental Hygiene Variable/Frequency | Total (No./%) | Males (No./%) | Females (No./%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tooth brushing frequency | ||||
| Twice/day | 507 (78.0%) | 95 (65.1%) | 412 (81.7%) | <0.001 |
| Less than once/day or “sometimes I forgot” | 143 (22.0 %) | 51 (34.9%) | 92 (18.3%) | |
| Evening tooth brushing frequency | ||||
| Every evening | 431 (66.3%) | 89 (60.9%) | 342 (67.8%) | 0.140 |
| Rare/not at all | 219 (33.7%) | 57 (39.1 %) | 162 (32.2%) | |
| Dental visit frequency | ||||
| 1–2 times/year | 386 (59.4%) | 82 (56.2%) | 304 (60.3%) | 0.420 |
| In pain/not at all | 264 (40. 6%) | 64 (43.8%) | 200 (39.7%) | |
| Fluoridated toothpaste use | ||||
| With fluoride | 489 (75.2%) | 97 (66.4%) | 392 (77.8%) | <0.001 |
| Without fluoride | 161 (24.8%) | 49 (33.6%) | 112 (22.2%) | |
p < 0.05 statistically significant.
Figure 2Percentages of adolescents with decayed, missing, or filled teeth by age sub-group and the number of caries.
Hygiene practices and decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) index.
| Hygiene Behaviors Variable | DMFT (Mean ± SD) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Teeth brushing frequency | ||
| Twice/day | 3.1 ± 1.9 | <0.814 |
| Less than once/day or “sometimes I forgot” | 3.2 ± 2.1 | |
| Evening tooth brushing frequency | ||
| Rare/never | 3.2 ± 2.2 | 0.770 |
| Frequent | 3.1 ± 1.9 | |
| Dental visit frequency | ||
| 1–2 times per year | 3.0 ± 2.0 | 0.404 |
| In pain/ not at all | 3.1 ± 2.1 | |
| Fluoridated toothpaste use | ||
| with fluoride | 3.1 ± 1.9 | 0.055 |
| without fluoride | 3.2 ± 2.3 |
p < 0.05 statistically significant.
Dietary behaviors of the studied sample. Use of sugary food (type and frequency).
| Food Type and Frequency | Total No % | Male No % | Female No % |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chocolate | ||||
| Never/rare | 246 (37.8%) | 60 (41.1%) | 186 (36.9%) | 0.410 |
| Frequent | 404 (62.1%) | 86 (58.9%) | 318 (63.1%) | |
| Cakes, ice-cream, biscuits | ||||
| Never/rare | 405 (62.3%) | 87 (59.6%) | 318 (63.1%) | 0.500 |
| Frequent | 245 (37.7%) | 59 (40.4%) | 186 (36.9%) | |
| Sugar, candies | ||||
| Never/rare | 438 (67.4%) | 99 (67.8%) | 339 (67.3%) | 0.980 |
| Frequent | 212 (32.6%) | 47 (32.2%) | 165 (32.7%) | |
| Jams and syrup | ||||
| Never/rare | 465 (71.4%) | 96 (65.7%) | 369 (73.2%) | 0.090 |
| Frequent | 185 (28.6%) | 50 (34.2%) | 135 (26.7%) | |
| Sugary sweetened beverages (SSB’s) (sodas) | ||||
| Never/rare | 419 (64.5%) | 80 (54.8%) | 339 (67.3%) | <0.001 |
| Frequent | 231 (35.5%) | 66 (45.2%) | 165 (32.7%) | |
| Added Sugar | ||||
| Never/rare | 228 (35.1%) | 62 (42.5%) | 166 (32.9%) | 0.170 |
| Frequent | 422 (64.9%) | 84 (57.5%) | 338 (67.1%) | |
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Bivariate analysis between sugary food consumption and DMFT index.
| Sugary Food Consumption | DMFT Index (Mean) | ±SD |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Chocolate | |||
| Frequent | 3.2 | ±2.1 | 0.610 |
| Never/rare | 3.06 | ±1.9 | |
| Cakes, ice-cream, biscuits | |||
| Frequent | 3.2 | ±1.9 | 0.220 |
| Never/rare | 3.1 | ±2.1 | |
| Sugar candies | |||
| Frequent | 3.2 | ±2.0 | 0.164 |
| Never/rare | 3.1 | ±2.1 | |
| Jams syrups | |||
| Frequent | 3.5 | ±2.3 | 0.004 |
| Never/rare | 3.0 | ±1.9 | |
| Sugary sweetened beverages SSB’s (sodas) | |||
| Frequent | 3.1 | ±1.8 | 0.414 |
| Never/rare | 3.1 | ±2.2 | |
| Added Sugar | |||
| Frequent | 3.1 | ±1.4 | 0.012 |
| Never/rare | 2.6 | ±1.7 |
p < 0.05 statistically significant; ±SD—standard deviation.
Lifestyle factors predicting the DMFT index according to linear regression.
| Independent Variable | B | ±Standard Error (SE) | Beta |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Constant) | 4.04 | 0.63 | 6.46 | 0.000 | |
| Residence (urban/rural) | −0.11 | 0.41 | −0.02 | −0.26 | 0.790 |
| Age | 0.84 | 0.38 | 0.17 | 2.21 | 0.020 |
| Gender | 0.13 | 0.39 | 0.03 | 0.32 | 0.750 |
| Father education | 0.22 | 0.37 | 0.04 | 0.59 | 0.560 |
| Mother education | −0.54 | 0.40 | −0.10 | −1.3 | 0.180 |
| Dental behavior | |||||
| Teeth brushing frequency | −0.23 | 0.36 | −0.04 | −0.65 | 0.520 |
| Dentist visit frequency | −0.30 | 0.35 | −0.06 | 0.86 | 0.040 |
| Toothpaste | 0.05 | 0.37 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.880 |
| Eating behavior | |||||
| Sodas (SSB’s) | 0.91 | 0.41 | 0.17 | −2.21 | 0.030 |
| Cakes, biscuits, ice cream | −0.37 | 0.39 | −0.07 | −0.96 | 0.340 |
| Sugar, candies | −0.48 | 0.43 | −0.09 | −1.14 | 0.260 |
| Jam, syrup | 0.63 | 0.41 | 0.12 | 1.54 | 0.120 |
| Chocolate | 0.63 | 0.38 | 0.12 | 1.66 | 0.100 |
p < 0.05 statistically significant; Dependent variable: DMFT: B—unstandardized coefficients; Beta—standardized coefficients.