Phuong T Ly1, Alexandra Lucas2, Sio Hang Pun3, Anna Dondzillo2, Chao Liu1, Achim Klug2, Tim C Lei4. 1. The Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Colorado, Denver, CO 80204, USA. 2. The Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, CO 80045, USA. 3. State Key Laboratory of Analog and Mixed-Signal VLSI, Institute of Microelectronics, University of Macau, Macau, China. 4. The Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Colorado, Denver, CO 80204, USA; State Key Laboratory of Analog and Mixed-Signal VLSI, Institute of Microelectronics, University of Macau, Macau, China. Electronic address: timclei@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some experimental approaches in neuroscience research require the precise placement of a recording electrode, pipette or other tool into a specific brain area that can be quite small and/or located deep beneath the surface. This process is typically aided with stereotaxic methods but remains challenging due to a lack of advanced technology to aid the experimenter. Currently, procedures require a significant amount of skill, have a high failure rate, and take up a significant amount of time. NEW METHOD: We developed a next generation robotic stereotaxic platform for small rodents by combining a three-dimensional (3D) skull profiler sub-system and a full six degree-of-freedom (6DOF) robotic platform. The 3D skull profiler is based on structured illumination in which a series of horizontal and vertical line patterns are projected onto an animal skull. These patterns are captured by two two-dimensional (2D) CCD cameras which reconstruct an accurate 3D skull surface profile based on structured illumination and geometrical triangulation. Using the reconstructed 3D profile, the skull can be repositioned using a 6DOF robotic platform to accurately align a surgical tool. RESULTS: The system was evaluated using mechanical measurement techniques, and the accuracy of the platform was demonstrated using agar brain phantoms and animal skulls. Additionally, a small and deep brain nucleus (the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body) were targeted in rodents to confirm the targeting accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The new stereotaxic system can accomplish "skull-flat" rapidly and precisely and with minimal user intervention, and thus reduces the failure rate of such experiments.
BACKGROUND: Some experimental approaches in neuroscience research require the precise placement of a recording electrode, pipette or other tool into a specific brain area that can be quite small and/or located deep beneath the surface. This process is typically aided with stereotaxic methods but remains challenging due to a lack of advanced technology to aid the experimenter. Currently, procedures require a significant amount of skill, have a high failure rate, and take up a significant amount of time. NEW METHOD: We developed a next generation robotic stereotaxic platform for small rodents by combining a three-dimensional (3D) skull profiler sub-system and a full six degree-of-freedom (6DOF) robotic platform. The 3D skull profiler is based on structured illumination in which a series of horizontal and vertical line patterns are projected onto an animal skull. These patterns are captured by two two-dimensional (2D) CCD cameras which reconstruct an accurate 3D skull surface profile based on structured illumination and geometrical triangulation. Using the reconstructed 3D profile, the skull can be repositioned using a 6DOF robotic platform to accurately align a surgical tool. RESULTS: The system was evaluated using mechanical measurement techniques, and the accuracy of the platform was demonstrated using agar brain phantoms and animal skulls. Additionally, a small and deep brain nucleus (the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body) were targeted in rodents to confirm the targeting accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The new stereotaxic system can accomplish "skull-flat" rapidly and precisely and with minimal user intervention, and thus reduces the failure rate of such experiments.
Authors: Ulrich Hagn; R Konietschke; A Tobergte; M Nickl; S Jörg; B Kübler; G Passig; M Gröger; F Fröhlich; U Seibold; L Le-Tien; A Albu-Schäffer; A Nothhelfer; F Hacker; M Grebenstein; G Hirzinger Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2009-06-13 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Blake Hannaford; Jacob Rosen; Diana W Friedman; Hawkeye King; Phillip Roan; Lei Cheng; Daniel Glozman; Ji Ma; Sina Nia Kosari; Lee White Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Yan Cui; Sebastian Schuon; Sebastian Thrun; Didier Stricker; Christian Theobalt Journal: IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 6.226
Authors: Otto Albrecht; Anna Dondzillo; Florian Mayer; John A Thompson; Achim Klug Journal: Front Neural Circuits Date: 2014-07-29 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Leila Ghanbari; Mathew L Rynes; Jia Hu; Daniel S Schulman; Gregory W Johnson; Michael Laroque; Gabriella M Shull; Suhasa B Kodandaramaiah Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 4.379