Literature DB >> 32970190

[Keratoconus detection and classification from parameters of the Corvis®ST : A study based on algorithms of machine learning].

Achim Langenbucher1, Larissa Häfner2, Timo Eppig3, Berthold Seitz2, Nóra Szentmáry4, Elias Flockerzi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: In the last decades increasingly more systems of artificial intelligence have been established in medicine, which identify diseases or pathologies or discriminate them from complimentary diseases. Up to now the Corvis®ST (Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology, Corvis®ST, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) yielded a binary index for classifying keratoconus but did not enable staging. The purpose of this study was to develop a prediction model, which mimics the topographic keratoconus classification index (TKC) of the Pentacam high resolution (HR, Oculus) with measurement parameters extracted from the Corvis®ST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study 60 measurements from normal subjects (TKC 0) and 379 eyes with keratoconus (TKC 1-4) were recruited. After measurement with the Pentacam HR (target parameter TKC) a measurement with the Corvis®ST device was performed. From this device 6 dynamic response parameters were extracted, which were included in the Corvis biomechanical index (CBI) provided by the Corvis®ST (ARTh, SP-A1, DA ratio 1 mm, DA ratio 2 mm, A1 velocity, max. deformation amplitude). In addition to the TKC as the target, the binarized TKC (1: TKC 1-4, 0: TKC 0) was modelled. The performance of the model was validated with accuracy as an indicator for correct classification made by the algorithm. Misclassifications in the modelling were penalized by the number of stages of deviation between the modelled and measured TKC values.
RESULTS: A total of 24 different models of supervised machine learning from 6 different families were tested. For modelling of the TKC stages 0-4, the algorithm based on a support vector machine (SVM) with linear kernel showed the best performance with an accuracy of 65.1% correct classifications. For modelling of binarized TKC, a decision tree with a coarse resolution showed a superior performance with an accuracy of 95.2% correct classifications followed by the SVM with linear or quadratic kernel and a nearest neighborhood classifier with cubic kernel (94.5% each).
CONCLUSION: This study aimed to show the principle of supervised machine learning applied to a set-up for the modelled classification of keratoconus staging. Preprocessed measurement data extracted from the Corvis®ST device were used to mimic the TKC provided by the Pentacam device with a series of different algorithms of machine learning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Corvis; Keratoconus; Scheimpflug corneal tomography; Supervised machine learning

Year:  2020        PMID: 32970190     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-020-01231-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  12 in total

1.  Current keratoconus detection methods compared with a neural network approach.

Authors:  M K Smolek; S D Klyce
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The Future of Keratoconus Screening with Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Stephen D Klyce
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  [Application of Deep Learning in Early Diagnosis Assistant System of Keratoconus].

Authors:  Anzu Tan; Man Yu; Xuan Chen; Liang Hu
Journal:  Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi       Date:  2019-03-30

4.  Neural network classification of corneal topography. Preliminary demonstration.

Authors:  N Maeda; S D Klyce; M K Smolek
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis.

Authors:  N Maeda; S D Klyce; M K Smolek; H W Thompson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Screening for Keratoconus and Related Ectatic Corneal Disorders.

Authors:  J Bradley Randleman; William J Dupps; Marcony R Santhiago; Yaron S Rabinowitz; Doug D Koch; R Doyle Stulting; Stephen D Klyce
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Screening Candidates for Refractive Surgery With Corneal Tomographic-Based Deep Learning.

Authors:  Yi Xie; Lanqin Zhao; Xiaonan Yang; Xiaohang Wu; Yahan Yang; Xiaoman Huang; Fang Liu; Jiping Xu; Limian Lin; Haiqin Lin; Qiting Feng; Haotian Lin; Quan Liu
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  Complementary Keratoconus Indices Based on Topographical Interpretation of Biomechanical Waveform Parameters: A Supplement to Established Keratoconus Indices.

Authors:  Susanne Goebels; Timo Eppig; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Alan Cayless; Berthold Seitz; Achim Langenbucher
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  KeratoDetect: Keratoconus Detection Algorithm Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Alexandru Lavric; Popa Valentin
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-23

10.  The Role of Corneal Biomechanics for the Evaluation of Ectasia Patients.

Authors:  Marcella Q Salomão; Ana Luisa Hofling-Lima; Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte; Bernardo Lopes; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Paolo Vinciguerra; Jens Bühren; Nelson Sena; Guilherme Simões Luz Hilgert; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.