Literature DB >> 32969580

D-Dimer Enhances Risk-Targeted Thromboprophylaxis in Ambulatory Patients with Cancer.

Vaibhav Kumar1,2, Joseph R Shaw3, Nigel S Key1,2, Anton Ilich1,2, Ranjeeta Mallick3, Philip S Wells3, Marc Carrier3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thromboprophylaxis for ambulatory patients with cancer is effective, although uncertainties remain on who should be targeted. Using D-dimer values from individuals enrolled to the AVERT trial, we sought to identify and validate a more efficient venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk threshold for thromboprophylaxis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The AVERT trial compared thromboprophylaxis with apixaban with placebo among patients with cancer with a Khorana Risk Score ≥2. The D-dimer measured at randomization was used to calculate an individualized 6-month VTE risk using the validated CATScore. A modified intention-to-treat analysis was used to assess efficacy (VTE) and safety (major and overall bleeding) in the (a) complete cohort and (b) ≥8% and < 8% 6-month VTE risk thresholds.
RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-four patients were randomized in the AVERT trial; 466 (81%) with baseline D-dimer were included in the study. Two hundred thirty-seven subjects received apixaban; 229 received placebo. In the complete cohort, there were 13 (5.5%) VTE events in the apixaban arm compared with 26 (11.4%) events in the placebo arm (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.49 [0.25-0.95], p < .05). Number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one VTE = 17. Eighty-two (35%) and 72 (31%) patients in the apixaban and placebo arms, respectively, had a 6-month VTE risk ≥8%. In this subgroup, 7 (8.4%) VTE events occurred with apixaban and 19 (26.3%) events with placebo (aHR 0.33 [0.14-0.81], p < .05), NNT = 6. Individuals with a VTE risk <8% derived no benefit from apixaban thromboprophylaxis (aHR 0.89 [0.30-2.65), p = .84). Increased rates of overall bleeding were observed with apixaban in both the complete (aHR 2.11 [1.09-4.09], p < .05) and ≥ 8% predicted risk cohorts (aHR 2.87 [0.91-9.13], p = .07).
CONCLUSION: A 6-month VTE risk threshold of ≥8% increases the efficiency of risk-targeted thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Ambulatory patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). A Khorana Risk Score (KRS) ≥2 is currently the suggested threshold for thromboprophylaxis. Using baseline D-dimer values from individuals enrolled to the AVERT trial, this retrospective validation study identifies a 6-month VTE risk of ≥8% as a more efficient threshold for thromboprophylaxis. At this threshold, the number needed to treat to prevent one VTE is 6, compared with 17 when using a KRS ≥2. Conversely, individuals with a predicted risk of <8% derive no clinical benefit from thromboprophylaxis. Future prospective studies should validate this threshold for outpatient thromboprophylaxis. © AlphaMed Press 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apixaban; Cancer-associated thrombosis; D-dimer; Thromboprophylaxis; Venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32969580      PMCID: PMC7938400          DOI: 10.1002/onco.13540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  29 in total

Review 1.  The cost of dichotomising continuous variables.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Patrick Royston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-06

2.  From Trial to Target Populations - Calibrating Real-World Data.

Authors:  Mehdi Najafzadeh; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Use of Risk Assessment Tools to Guide Decision-Making in the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Special Report From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology.

Authors:  Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Lynne T Braun; Chiadi E Ndumele; Sidney C Smith; Laurence S Sperling; Salim S Virani; Roger S Blumenthal
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Philip S Wells; David R Anderson; Marc Rodger; Melissa Forgie; Clive Kearon; Jonathan Dreyer; George Kovacs; Michael Mitchell; Bernard Lewandowski; Michael J Kovacs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis.

Authors:  Alok A Khorana; Nicole M Kuderer; Eva Culakova; Gary H Lyman; Charles W Francis
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.

Authors:  Xavier Robin; Natacha Turck; Alexandre Hainard; Natalia Tiberti; Frédérique Lisacek; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Markus Müller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Comparison of risk prediction scores for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nick van Es; Marcello Di Nisio; Gabriela Cesarman; Ankie Kleinjan; Hans-Martin Otten; Isabelle Mahé; Ineke T Wilts; Desirée C Twint; Ettore Porreca; Oscar Arrieta; Alain Stépanian; Kirsten Smit; Michele De Tursi; Suzanne M Bleker; Patrick M Bossuyt; Rienk Nieuwland; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Harry R Büller
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 9.941

8.  Dynamic Thromboembolic Risk Modelling to Target Appropriate Preventative Strategies for Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Marliese Alexander; David Ball; Benjamin Solomon; Michael MacManus; Renee Manser; Bernhard Riedel; David Westerman; Sue M Evans; Rory Wolfe; Kate Burbury
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Primary Thromboprophylaxis in Ambulatory Cancer Patients: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Frits I Mulder; Floris T M Bosch; Nick van Es
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement.

Authors:  David M Kent; Jessica K Paulus; David van Klaveren; Ralph D'Agostino; Steve Goodman; Rodney Hayward; John P A Ioannidis; Bray Patrick-Lake; Sally Morton; Michael Pencina; Gowri Raman; Joseph S Ross; Harry P Selker; Ravi Varadhan; Andrew Vickers; John B Wong; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  1 in total

1.  Validation of the Khorana score for predicting venous thromboembolism in 40 218 patients with cancer initiating chemotherapy.

Authors:  Thure Filskov Overvad; Anne Gulbech Ording; Peter Brønnum Nielsen; Flemming Skjøth; Ida Ehlers Albertsen; Simon Noble; Anders Krog Vistisen; Inger Lise Gade; Marianne Tang Severinsen; Gregory Piazza; Torben Bjerregaard Larsen
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-05-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.