Literature DB >> 30586766

Use of Risk Assessment Tools to Guide Decision-Making in the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Special Report From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology.

Donald M Lloyd-Jones, Lynne T Braun, Chiadi E Ndumele, Sidney C Smith, Laurence S Sperling, Salim S Virani, Roger S Blumenthal.   

Abstract

Risk assessment is a critical step in the current approach to primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Knowledge of the 10-year risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease identifies patients in higher-risk groups who are likely to have greater net benefit and lower number needed to treat for both statins and antihypertensive therapy. Current US prevention guidelines for blood pressure and cholesterol management recommend use of the pooled cohort equations to start a process of shared decision-making between clinicians and patients in primary prevention. The pooled cohort equations have been widely validated and are broadly useful for the general US clinical population. But, they may systematically underestimate risk in patients from certain racial/ethnic groups, those with lower socioeconomic status or with chronic inflammatory diseases, and overestimate risk in patients with higher socioeconomic status or who have been closely engaged with preventive healthcare services. If uncertainty remains for patients at borderline or intermediate risk, or if the patient is undecided after a patient-clinician discussion with consideration of risk enhancing factors (eg, family history), additional testing with measurement of coronary artery calcium can be useful to reclassify risk estimates and improve selection of patients for use or avoidance of statin therapy. This special report summarizes the rationale and evidence base for quantitative risk assessment, reviews strengths and limitations of existing risk scores, discusses approaches for refining individual risk estimates for patients, and provides practical advice regarding implementation of risk assessment and decision-making strategies in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AHA Scientific Statements; atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; prevention; primary prevention; relative risk; risk assessment; secondary prevention

Year:  2018        PMID: 30586766     DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  46 in total

1.  Estimating the accuracy of dual energy chest radiography for coronary calcium detection with lateral or anteroposterior orientations.

Authors:  Scott S Hsieh; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 2.  Optimizing Dyslipidemia Management for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: a Focus on Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Options.

Authors:  Adam N Berman; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  D-Dimer Enhances Risk-Targeted Thromboprophylaxis in Ambulatory Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Vaibhav Kumar; Joseph R Shaw; Nigel S Key; Anton Ilich; Ranjeeta Mallick; Philip S Wells; Marc Carrier
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-10-12

4.  Predictive Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score Categories for Coronary Events Versus Strokes: Impact of Sex and Race: MESA and DHS.

Authors:  Anurag Mehta; Ambarish Pandey; Colby R Ayers; Amit Khera; Laurence S Sperling; Moyses S Szklo; Rebecca F Gottesman; Mathew J Budoff; Michael J Blaha; Roger S Blumenthal; Khurram Nasir; Parag H Joshi
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Sex Differences in Coronary Artery Calcium and Mortality From Coronary Heart Disease, Cardiovascular Disease, and All Causes in Adults With Diabetes: The Coronary Calcium Consortium.

Authors:  Nathan D Wong; Amber R Cordola Hsu; Alan Rozanski; Leslee J Shaw; Seamus P Whelton; Matthew J Budoff; Khurram Nasir; Michael D Miedema; John Rumberger; Michael J Blaha; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  [Application of the China-PAR stroke risk equations in a rural northern Chinese population].

Authors:  X Tang; D D Zhang; X F Liu; Q P Liu; Y Cao; N Li; S P Huang; H D Dou; P Gao; Y H Hu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-06-18

7.  National Heart Foundation of Australia: position statement on coronary artery calcium scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Australia.

Authors:  Garry Lr Jennings; Ralph Audehm; Warrick Bishop; Clara K Chow; Siaw-Teng Liaw; Danny Liew; Sara M Linton
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Lifestyle Interventions Reduce the Need for Guideline-Directed Antihypertensive Medication.

Authors:  Alan L Hinderliter; Patrick Smith; Andrew Sherwood; James Blumenthal
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.080

Review 9.  New Frontiers in Psoriatic Disease Research, Part II: Comorbidities and Targeted Therapies.

Authors:  Di Yan; Andrew Blauvelt; Amit K Dey; Rachel S Golpanian; Samuel T Hwang; Nehal N Mehta; Bridget Myers; Zhen-Rui Shi; Gil Yosipovitch; Stacie Bell; Wilson Liao
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 7.590

10.  Metabolic Syndrome in an Aging Society - Role of Oxidant-Antioxidant Imbalance and Inflammation Markers in Disentangling Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Sylwia Dziegielewska-Gesiak
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.