Literature DB >> 32969178

Corticosteroid and Local Anesthetic Use Trends for Large Joint and Bursa Injections: Results of a Survey of Sports Medicine Physicians.

Daniel M Cushman1, Masaru Teramoto1, Alexandra Asay1, Nathan D Clements2, Zachary L McCormick1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physician decision-making surrounding choices for large joint and bursa injections is poorly defined, yet influences patient safety and treatment effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE: To identify practice patterns and rationale related to injectate choices for large joint and bursal injections performed by physician members of the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM).
DESIGN: An electronic survey was sent to 3400 members of the AMSSM. Demographic variables were collected: primary specialty (residency), training location, practice location, years of clinical experience, current practice type, and rationale for choosing an injectate. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 674 physicians responded (minimum response rate of 20%). INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes of interest included corticosteroid type and dose, local anesthetic type, and total injectate volume for each large joint or bursa (hip, knee, and shoulder).
RESULTS: Most respondents used triamcinolone (50% to 56% of physicians, depending on injection location) or methylprednisolone (25% to 29% of physicians), 21 to 40 mg (53% to 60% of physicians), diluted with lidocaine (79% to 87%) for all large joint or bursa injections. It was noted that 36.2% (244/674) of respondents reported using >40 mg for at least one injection type. Most (90.5%, 610/674) reported using an anesthetic other than ropivacaine for at least one type of joint or bursa injection. Physicians who reported lidocaine use were less likely to report that their injectate choice was based on the literature that they reviewed (odds ratio [OR] 0.41 [0.27-0.62], P < .001). Respondents predominantly used 5 to 7 mL of total injectate for all large joints or bursae (45% to 54% of respondents), except for the pes anserine bursa, where 3-4 mL was more common (51% of physicians).
CONCLUSIONS: It appears that triamcinolone and methylprednisolone are the most commonly used corticosteroids for sports medicine physicians; most physicians use 21 to 40 mg of corticosteroid for all injections, and lidocaine is the most-often used local anesthetic; very few use ropivacaine. Over one-third of respondents used high-dose (>40 mg triamcinolone or methylprednisolone) for at least one joint or bursa.
© 2020 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32969178      PMCID: PMC8674102          DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PM R        ISSN: 1934-1482            Impact factor:   2.218


  36 in total

1.  The in vitro chondrotoxicity of single-dose local anesthetics.

Authors:  Jason L Dragoo; Hillary J Braun; Hyeon Joo Kim; Huy D Phan; S Raymond Golish
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 3.  Single-dose local anesthetics exhibit a type-, dose-, and time-dependent chondrotoxic effect on chondrocytes and cartilage: a systematic review of the current literature.

Authors:  Peter Cornelius Kreuz; Matthias Steinwachs; Peter Angele
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Cytotoxic effects of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and lidocaine on rotator cuff tenofibroblasts.

Authors:  Chang-Meen Sung; Young-Sool Hah; Jin-Su Kim; Jeoung-Bin Nam; Ra Jeong Kim; Sang-Jin Lee; Hyung Bin Park
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Pain relief in the rheumatoid knee after steroid injection. A single-blind comparison of hydrocortisone succinate, and triamcinolone acetonide or hexacetonide.

Authors:  T Blyth; J A Hunter; A Stirling
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1994-05

6.  Comparison between intraarticular triamcinolone acetonide and methylprednisolone acetate injections in treatment of frozen shoulder.

Authors:  Riyadh A Sakeni; Marwan S M Al-Nimer
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  Systemic effects of epidural and intra-articular glucocorticoid injections in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Authors:  Mohamed Younes; Fadoua Neffati; Mongi Touzi; Saoussen Hassen-Zrour; Yosr Fendri; Ismail Béjia; Adel Ben Amor; Naceur Bergaoui; Mohamed Fadhel Najjar
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Clinical comparison of triamcinolonehexacetonide and betamethasone in the treatment of osteoarthrosis of the knee-joint.

Authors:  E J Valtonen
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol Suppl       Date:  1981

9.  Comparison of 2 Dosages of Intraarticular Triamcinolone for the Treatment of Knee Arthritis: Results of a 12-week Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jan Willem Popma; Frank W Snel; Cees J Haagsma; Petra Brummelhuis-Visser; Hans G J Oldenhof; Job van der Palen; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  Cytotoxicity of drugs injected into joints in orthopaedics.

Authors:  P Busse; C Vater; M Stiehler; J Nowotny; P Kasten; H Bretschneider; S B Goodman; M Gelinsky; S Zwingenberger
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 5.853

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Fluoroscopic-guided procedures of the lower extremity.

Authors:  Gunjan Malhotra; Barry G Hansford; Cindy Felcher; Kristie A Wuerfel; Corrie M Yablon
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.128

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.