Literature DB >> 32968920

Non-technical skills in robotic surgery and impact on near-miss events: a multi-center study.

Anthony Manuguerra1,2, Charles Mazeaud3, Nicolas Hubert4, Pascal Eschwège3,5,6, Mathieu Roumiguié7, Julia Salleron8, Jacques Hubert3,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery requires a set of non-technical skills (NTS), because of the complex environment. We aim to study relationship between NTS and near-miss events in robotic surgery.
METHODS: This is an observational study in five French centers. Three robotic procedures were observed and filmed by one of expert trainers in NTS. They established and scored a non-technical skills in robotic surgery (NTSRS) score, that included eight items, each scored from 1 to 5, to assess the whole surgical teams. The surgical teams also self-assessed their work. The number of near-miss events was recorded and classified as minor, or major but no harm incidents, independently by two surgeons. Correlations were Spearman coefficients.
RESULTS: Of the 26 procedures included, 15 were prostatectomy (58%), 9 nephrectomy (35%), and 2 pyeloplasty (7.7%). Half of procedures (n = 13) were performed by surgeons with extensive RS experience (more than 150 procedures). Per procedure, there was a median (quartiles) of 9 (7; 11) near-miss events. There was 1 (0; 2) major near-miss events, with no harm. The median NTSRS score was 18 (14; 21), out of 40. The number of near-miss events was strongly correlated with the NTSRS score (r = - 0.92, p < 0.001) but was not correlated with the surgeon's experience. The surgeons for fifteen (58%) procedures, and the bed-side surgeons for 11 (42%) procedures, felt that there was no need for an improvement in the quality of their NTS. None of the surgeons gave a negative self-evaluation for any procedure; in three procedures (12%), the bed-side surgeons self-assessed negatively, on ergonomics.
CONCLUSION: Occurrence of near-miss events was reduced in teams managing NTS. Specific NTS surgical team training is essential for robotic surgery as it may have a significant impact on risk management.
© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords:  Assessment; Live surgery; Near-miss events; Non-technical skills; Robotic surgery; Training

Year:  2020        PMID: 32968920     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07988-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  38 in total

Review 1.  The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Louise Hull; Sonal Arora; Rajesh Aggarwal; Ara Darzi; Charles Vincent; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals.

Authors:  Atul A Gawande; Michael J Zinner; David M Studdert; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Errors in the operating theatre--how to spot and stop them.

Authors:  Ken Catchpole
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2010-01

4.  Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels.

Authors:  A Mehrabian; S R Ferris
Journal:  J Consult Psychol       Date:  1967-06

Review 5.  Defining technical errors in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Esther M Bonrath; Nicolas J Dedy; Boris Zevin; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Examining Factors that Influence the Existence of Heinrich's Safety Triangle Using Site-Specific H&S Data from More than 25,000 Establishments.

Authors:  Patrick L Yorio; Susan M Moore
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Decoding of inconsistent communications.

Authors:  A Mehrabian; M Wiener
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1967-05

8.  Cognitive skills assessment during robot-assisted surgery: separating the wheat from the chaff.

Authors:  Khurshid A Guru; Ehsan T Esfahani; Syed J Raza; Rohit Bhat; Katy Wang; Yana Hammond; Gregory Wilding; James O Peabody; Ashirwad J Chowriappa
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Effective non-technical skills are imperative to robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Oliver Brunckhorst; Muhammad S Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Risk factors in patient safety: minimally invasive surgery versus conventional surgery.

Authors:  Sharon P Rodrigues; Aurystella M Wever; Jenny Dankelman; Frank W Jansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Factors affecting workflow in robot-assisted surgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jannie Lysgaard Poulsen; Birgitte Bruun; Doris Oestergaard; Lene Spanager
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings.

Authors:  Julia Schreyer; Amelie Koch; Annika Herlemann; Armin Becker; Boris Schlenker; Ken Catchpole; Matthias Weigl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.