Literature DB >> 32968863

Post-treatment CT LI-RADS categories: predictors of overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma post bland transarterial embolization.

William E L Ormiston1,2, Hooman Yarmohammadi1, Stephanie Lobaugh3, Juliana Schilsky1, Seth S Katz1, Maria LaGratta1, Sara Velayati1, Junting Zheng3, Marinela Capanu3, Richard K G Do4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The LI-RADS Treatment Response (LR-TR) algorithm was introduced in 2017 to assist radiologists in assessing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) response following locoregional therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the associations between pre-treatment LI-RADS diagnostic categories, post-treatment LR-TR categories, and mRECIST response categories with overall survival (OS) of patients with HCC.
METHODS: This retrospective study included untreated patients with one or two lesions who underwent transarterial embolization with or without concomitant ablation from December 2003 to December 2017. Two radiologists (R1 and R2) reviewed pre- and post-treatment CT imaging. Associations between pre- and post-treatment variables, including post-treatment LR-TR categories (Viable, Equivocal, Nonviable), with OS were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included (median age = 71 years, range 50-87; 17 women). The median OS from first embolization was 43.92 months. Pre- and post-treatment tumor size, pre-treatment LR-TIV (compared with LR-5), and post-treatment LR-TR Viable (compared with LR-TR Nonviable) were associated with OS (p < 0.05 for all). Median OS was shorter for LR-TR Viable patients (R1, 25.64 months, 95% CI 18.58-35.70; R2, 26.43 months 95% CI 20.68-43.92) than for LR-TR Nonviable patients (64.21 months R1 and R2, 95% CI 42.71-92.45 and 36.30-94.09, respectively). mRECIST categories showed similar associations with OS. Inter-reader agreement was moderate for LI-RADS categories (κ = 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.78) and substantial for LR-TR categories (κ = 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.81).
CONCLUSIONS: LR-TR categories show a strong association with OS in HCC patients treated with transarterial embolization.
© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Locoregional therapy; RECIST; Treatment response

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32968863      PMCID: PMC7988305          DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02775-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  20 in total

1.  LI-RADS treatment response categorization on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: diagnostic performance compared to mRECIST and added value of ancillary features.

Authors:  Se Woo Kim; Ijin Joo; Hyo-Cheol Kim; Su Joa Ahn; Hyo-Jin Kang; Sun Kyung Jeon; Jeong Min Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  2017 Version of LI-RADS for CT and MR Imaging: An Update.

Authors:  Khaled M Elsayes; Jonathan C Hooker; Michelle M Agrons; Ania Z Kielar; An Tang; Kathryn J Fowler; Victoria Chernyak; Mustafa R Bashir; Yuko Kono; Richard K Do; Donald G Mitchell; Aya Kamaya; Elizabeth M Hecht; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: Statistical confirmation of improved survival in responders by landmark analyses.

Authors:  Ahsun Riaz; Ahmed Gabr; Nadine Abouchaleh; Rehan Ali; Ali Al Asadi; Ronald Mora; Laura Kulik; Kush Desai; Bartley Thornburg; Samdeep Mouli; Ryan Hickey; Frank H Miller; Vahid Yaghmai; Daniel Ganger; Robert J Lewandowski; Riad Salem
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Alpha-fetoprotein level > 1000 ng/mL as an exclusion criterion for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria.

Authors:  Bilal Hameed; Neil Mehta; Gonzalo Sapisochin; John P Roberts; Francis Y Yao
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 5.799

5.  Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017.

Authors:  Nieun Seo; Myoung Soo Kim; Mi-Suk Park; Jin-Young Choi; Richard K G Do; Kyunghwa Han; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Randomized Trial of Hepatic Artery Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Doxorubicin-Eluting Microspheres Compared With Embolization With Microspheres Alone.

Authors:  Karen T Brown; Richard K Do; Mithat Gonen; Anne M Covey; George I Getrajdman; Constantinos T Sofocleous; William R Jarnagin; Michael I D'Angelica; Peter J Allen; Joseph P Erinjeri; Lynn A Brody; Gerald P O'Neill; Kristian N Johnson; Alessandra R Garcia; Christopher Beattie; Binsheng Zhao; Stephen B Solomon; Lawrence H Schwartz; Ronald DeMatteo; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Erin L Shropshire; Mohammad Chaudhry; Chad M Miller; Brian C Allen; Erol Bozdogan; Diana M Cardona; Lindsay Y King; Gemini L Janas; Richard K Do; Charles Y Kim; James Ronald; Mustafa R Bashir
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 29.146

9.  Mortality assessment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma according to underlying disease and treatment modalities.

Authors:  Pegah Golabi; Sofie Fazel; Munkhzul Otgonsuren; Mehmet Sayiner; Cameron T Locklear; Zobair M Younossi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Prognostic Relevance of Objective Response According to EASL Criteria and mRECIST Criteria in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Loco-Regional Therapies: A Literature-Based Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Bruno Vincenzi; Massimo Di Maio; Marianna Silletta; Loretta D'Onofrio; Chiara Spoto; Maria Carmela Piccirillo; Gennaro Daniele; Francesca Comito; Eliana Maci; Giuseppe Bronte; Antonio Russo; Daniele Santini; Francesco Perrone; Giuseppe Tonini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Up-to-Date Role of CT/MRI LI-RADS in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Guilherme Moura Cunha; Victoria Chernyak; Kathryn J Fowler; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2021-05-31

2.  LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy With Radiologic-Pathologic Explant Correlation in Patients With SBRT-Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Anum Aslam; Katherine E Maturen; Maria Westerhoff; Chris Maurino; Neehar D Parikh; Yilun Sun; Christopher J Sonnenday; Erica B Stein; Kimberly L Shampain; Ravi K Kaza; Kyle Cuneo; William Masch; Richard Kinh Gian Do; Theodore S Lawrence; Dawn Owen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 8.013

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.