Jesse Yu1, Qingxin Mu1, Simone Perazzolo1, James I Griffin1, Linxi Zhu1, Lisa A McConnachie1, Danny D Shen1, Rodney Jy Ho2,3. 1. Departments of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA. 2. Departments of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA. rodneyho@uw.edu. 3. Departments of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA. rodneyho@uw.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop drug-combination nanoparticles (DcNPs) composed of hydrophilic gemcitabine (G) and hydrophobic paclitaxel (T) and deliver both drugs to metastatic cancer cells. METHODS: GT DcNPs were evaluated based on particle size and drug association efficiency (AE%). The effect of DcNP on GT plasma time-course and tissue distribution was characterized in mice and a pharmacokinetic model was developed. A GT distribution study into cancer nodules (derived from 4 T1 cells) was performed. RESULTS: An optimized GT DcNP composition (d = 59.2 nm ±9.2 nm) was found to be suitable for IV formulation. Plasma exposure of G and T were enhanced 61-fold and 3.8-fold when given in DcNP form compared to the conventional formulation, respectively. Mechanism based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation show that both G and T remain highly associated to DcNPs in vivo (G: 98%, T:75%). GT DcNPs have minimal distribution to healthy organs with selective distribution and retention in tumor burdened tissue. Tumor bearing lungs had a 5-fold higher tissue-to-plasma ratio of gemcitabine in GT DcNPs compared to healthy lungs. CONCLUSIONS: DcNPs can deliver hydrophilic G and hydrophobic T together to cancer nodules and produce long acting exposure, likely due to stable GT association to DcNPs in vivo.
PURPOSE: To develop drug-combination nanoparticles (DcNPs) composed of hydrophilic gemcitabine (G) and hydrophobic paclitaxel (T) and deliver both drugs to metastatic cancer cells. METHODS: GT DcNPs were evaluated based on particle size and drug association efficiency (AE%). The effect of DcNP on GT plasma time-course and tissue distribution was characterized in mice and a pharmacokinetic model was developed. A GT distribution study into cancer nodules (derived from 4 T1 cells) was performed. RESULTS: An optimized GT DcNP composition (d = 59.2 nm ±9.2 nm) was found to be suitable for IV formulation. Plasma exposure of G and T were enhanced 61-fold and 3.8-fold when given in DcNP form compared to the conventional formulation, respectively. Mechanism based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation show that both G and T remain highly associated to DcNPs in vivo (G: 98%, T:75%). GT DcNPs have minimal distribution to healthy organs with selective distribution and retention in tumor burdened tissue. Tumor bearing lungs had a 5-fold higher tissue-to-plasma ratio of gemcitabine in GT DcNPs compared to healthy lungs. CONCLUSIONS: DcNPs can deliver hydrophilic G and hydrophobic T together to cancer nodules and produce long acting exposure, likely due to stable GT association to DcNPs in vivo.
Entities:
Keywords:
breast cancer; mechanism based pharmacokinetic modeling; nanoparticles; pharmacokinetics; tumor distribution
Authors: Margaret Tempero; William Plunkett; Veronique Ruiz Van Haperen; John Hainsworth; Howard Hochster; Renato Lenzi; James Abbruzzese Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-07-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L Gianni; C M Kearns; A Giani; G Capri; L Viganó; A Lacatelli; G Bonadonna; M J Egorin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1995-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Qingxin Mu; Jesse Yu; James I Griffin; Yan Wu; Linxi Zhu; Lisa A McConnachie; Rodney J Y Ho Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 3.240