Ali Ahmad1,2, Zahi Ibrahim1, Georges Sakr3, Abdallah El-Bizri4, Lara Masri1, Imad H Elhajj5, Nehme El-Hachem5, Hussain Isma'eel1,4. 1. Vascular Medicine Program, Division of Cardiology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 3. Department of Computer Engineering, St Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 5. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recognizing low right ventricular (RV) function from 2-dimentiontial echocardiography (2D-ECHO) is challenging when parameters are contradictory. We aim to develop a model to predict low RV function integrating the various 2D-ECHO parameters in reference to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-the gold standard. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent a 2D-ECHO and a CMR within 3 months of each other at our institution (American University of Beirut Medical Center). We extracted three parameters (TAPSE, S' and FACRV) that are classically used to assess RV function. We have assessed the ability of 2D-ECHO derived parameters and clinical features to predict RV function measured by the gold standard CMR. We compared outcomes from four machine learning algorithms, widely used in the biomedical community to solve classification problems. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-five patients were identified and included in our study. Average age was 43±17.1 years old and 52/156 (33.3%) were females. According to CMR, 21 patients were identified to have RV dysfunction, with an RVEF of 34.7%±6.4%, as opposed to 54.7%±6.7% in the normal RV population (P<0.0001). The Random Forest model was able to detect low RV function with an AUC =0.80, while general linear regression performed poorly in our population with an AUC of 0.62. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we trained and validated an ML-based algorithm that could detect low RV function from clinical and 2D-ECHO parameters. The algorithm has two advantages: first, it performed better than general linear regression, and second, it integrated the various 2D-ECHO parameters. 2020 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Recognizing low right ventricular (RV) function from 2-dimentiontial echocardiography (2D-ECHO) is challenging when parameters are contradictory. We aim to develop a model to predict low RV function integrating the various 2D-ECHO parameters in reference to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-the gold standard. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent a 2D-ECHO and a CMR within 3 months of each other at our institution (American University of Beirut Medical Center). We extracted three parameters (TAPSE, S' and FACRV) that are classically used to assess RV function. We have assessed the ability of 2D-ECHO derived parameters and clinical features to predict RV function measured by the gold standard CMR. We compared outcomes from four machine learning algorithms, widely used in the biomedical community to solve classification problems. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-five patients were identified and included in our study. Average age was 43±17.1 years old and 52/156 (33.3%) were females. According to CMR, 21 patients were identified to have RV dysfunction, with an RVEF of 34.7%±6.4%, as opposed to 54.7%±6.7% in the normal RV population (P<0.0001). The Random Forest model was able to detect low RV function with an AUC =0.80, while general linear regression performed poorly in our population with an AUC of 0.62. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we trained and validated an ML-based algorithm that could detect low RV function from clinical and 2D-ECHO parameters. The algorithm has two advantages: first, it performed better than general linear regression, and second, it integrated the various 2D-ECHO parameters. 2020 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.
Authors: Nagesh S Anavekar; David Gerson; Hicham Skali; Raymond Y Kwong; E Kent Yucel; Scott D Solomon Journal: Echocardiography Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 1.724
Authors: Akhil Narang; Victor Mor-Avi; Aldo Prado; Valentina Volpato; David Prater; Gloria Tamborini; Laura Fusini; Mauro Pepi; Neha Goyal; Karima Addetia; Alexandra Gonçalves; Amit R Patel; Roberto M Lang Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Hugo G Hulshof; Thijs M H Eijsvogels; Geert Kleinnibbelink; Arie P van Dijk; Keith P George; David L Oxborough; Dick H J Thijssen Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Wendy Tsang; Ivan S Salgo; Diego Medvedofsky; Masaaki Takeuchi; David Prater; Lynn Weinert; Megan Yamat; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel; Roberto M Lang Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-06-15
Authors: Zachi I Attia; Suraj Kapa; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Paul M McKie; Dorothy J Ladewig; Gaurav Satam; Patricia A Pellikka; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Peter A Noseworthy; Thomas M Munger; Samuel J Asirvatham; Christopher G Scott; Rickey E Carter; Paul A Friedman Journal: Nat Med Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Steffen E Petersen; Nay Aung; Mihir M Sanghvi; Filip Zemrak; Kenneth Fung; Jose Miguel Paiva; Jane M Francis; Mohammed Y Khanji; Elena Lukaschuk; Aaron M Lee; Valentina Carapella; Young Jin Kim; Paul Leeson; Stefan K Piechnik; Stefan Neubauer Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 5.364