Literature DB >> 27318718

Transthoracic 3D Echocardiographic Left Heart Chamber Quantification Using an Automated Adaptive Analytics Algorithm.

Wendy Tsang1, Ivan S Salgo2, Diego Medvedofsky3, Masaaki Takeuchi3, David Prater2, Lynn Weinert3, Megan Yamat3, Victor Mor-Avi3, Amit R Patel3, Roberto M Lang4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to test the feasibility and accuracy of an automated algorithm that simultaneously quantifies 3-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)-derived left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Conventional manual 3D TTE tracings and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images were used as a reference for comparison.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac chamber quantification from 3D TTE is superior to 2D TTE measurements. However, integration of 3D quantification into clinical practice has been limited by time-consuming workflow and the need for 3D expertise. A novel automated software was developed that provides LV and LA volumetric quantification from 3D TTE datasets that reflect real-life manual 3-dimensional echocardiography measurements and values comparable to CMR.
METHODS: A total of 159 patients were studied in 2 separate protocols. In protocol 1, 94 patients underwent 3D TTE imaging (EPIQ, iE33, X5-1, Philips Healthcare, Andover, Massachusetts) covering the left atrium and left ventricle. LA and LV volumes and LVEF were obtained using the automated software (HeartModel, Philips Healthcare) with and without contour correction, and compared with the averaged manual 3D volumetric measurements from 3 readers. In protocol 2, automated measurements from 65 patients were compared with a CMR reference. The Pearson correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, and paired Student t tests were used to assess inter-technique agreement.
RESULTS: Correlations between the automated and manual 3D TTE measurements were strong (r = 0.87 to 0.96). LVEF was underestimated and automated LV end-diastolic, LV end-systolic, and LA volumes were overestimated compared with manual measurements. Agreement between the automated analysis and CMR was also strong (r = 0.84 to 0.95). Test-retest variability was low.
CONCLUSIONS: Automated simultaneous quantification of LA and LV volumes and LVEF is feasible and requires minimal 3D software analysis training. The automated measurements are not only comparable to manual measurements but also to CMR. This technique is highly reproducible and timesaving, and it therefore promises to facilitate the integration of 3D TTE-based left-heart chamber quantification into clinical practice.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-dimensional echocardiography; automation; cardiac chamber quantification

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27318718     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  40 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Karthik Seetharam; James K Min
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

Review 2.  Regression of Left Ventricular Mass After Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Thierry H Le Jemtel; Rohan Samson; Abhishek Jaiswal; Eliza B Lewine; Suzanne Oparil
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Machine learning based automated dynamic quantification of left heart chamber volumes.

Authors:  Akhil Narang; Victor Mor-Avi; Aldo Prado; Valentina Volpato; David Prater; Gloria Tamborini; Laura Fusini; Mauro Pepi; Neha Goyal; Karima Addetia; Alexandra Gonçalves; Amit R Patel; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 4.  Cardiac imaging: working towards fully-automated machine analysis & interpretation.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Damini Dey; Arkadiusz Sitek; Manish Motwani; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 5.  Echocardiographic assessment of mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kagiyama; Sirish Shrestha
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 6.  Recent Advances and Trends in Pediatric Cardiac Imaging.

Authors:  Wadi Mawad; Luc L Mertens
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-21

7.  The Role of Automated 3D Echocardiography for Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Assessment.

Authors:  Ernest Spitzer; Ben Ren; Felix Zijlstra; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Marcel L Geleijnse
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11

Review 8.  Incorporating three-dimensional echocardiography into clinical practice.

Authors:  Kazuaki Tanabe; Kazuto Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2019-09-11

Review 9.  Recent technological advancements in cardiac ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Jaydev K Dave; Maureen E Mc Donald; Praveen Mehrotra; Andrew R Kohut; John R Eisenbrey; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Position Statement on Indications of Echocardiography in Adults - 2019.

Authors:  Silvio Henrique Barberato; Minna Moreira Dias Romano; Adenalva Lima de Souza Beck; Ana Clara Tude Rodrigues; André Luiz Cerqueira de Almeida; Bruna Morhy Borges Leal Assunção; Eliza de Almeida Gripp; Fabio Villaça Guimarães Filho; Henry Abensur; José Maria Del Castillo; Marcelo Haertel Miglioranza; Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira; Márcio Vinicius Lins de Barros; Maria do Carmo Pereira Nunes; Maria Estefania Bosco Otto; Renato de Aguiar Hortegal; Rodrigo Bellio de Mattos Barretto; Thais Harada Campos; Vicente Nicoliello de Siqueira; Samira Saady Morhy
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.