| Literature DB >> 32968402 |
Saba Tariq1, Sundus Tariq2, Shaista Hussain3, Mukhtiar Baig4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of serum osteoprotegerin (OPG) with the severity of chronic liver disease in female patients.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic liver disease; Hepatomegaly; Osteoprotegerin; liver cirrhosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32968402 PMCID: PMC7501019 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.36.6.2678
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pak J Med Sci ISSN: 1681-715X Impact factor: 1.088
General, anthropometric characters and OPG levels in cases and controls.
| Control (Normal) n=29 Mean (SD) | Cases (CLD) n=50 Mean (SD) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 54.14 (8.145) | 53.30 (8.746) | 0.675 |
| Height (m) | 1.56 (0.063) | 1.58 (0.074) | 0.082 |
| Weight (kg) | 66.93 (10.222) | 75.62 (17.083) | 0.015 |
| BMI | 27.69 (4.900) | 30.16 (6.768) | 0.090 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 78.28 (6.430) | 84.22 (12.616) | 0.021 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 86.03 (5.241) | 94.88 (13.573) | 0.001 |
| W/H ratio | 0.92 ( 0.060) | 0.89 (0.069) | 0.033 |
| Ascites free weight (kg) | 66.93 (10.222) | 69.20 (24.571) | 0.637 |
| Pulse | 85.72 (7.959) | 80.92 (6.919) | 0.006 |
| Systolic BP (mm Hg) | 121.38 (14.072) | 126.40 (14.813) | 0.143 |
| Diastolic BP (mm Hg) | 80.34 (10.171) | 82.80 (10.698) | 0.320 |
| Temperature | 98.10 (0.310) | 98.29 (0.701) | 0.175 |
| Respiratory rate | 16.76 (2.415) | 15.36 (2.405) | 0.015 |
| OPG levels | 3.99 (1.427) | 3.79 (1.563) | 0.615 |
p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Severity of disease association with OPG using ANOVA.
| Child-Pugh classification | OPG Levels | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | ||
| Class A (n=13) | 2.832 | 0.722 | 0.029 |
| Class B(n=19) | 4.017 | 1.139 | |
| Class C(n=18) | 4.356 | 2.065 | |
| Post hoc analysis Tukey HSD | |||
| Groups | Mean difference | SEM | P value |
| Class A vs Class B | -1.184 | 0.567 | 0.105 |
| Class A vs Class C | -1.523 | 0.567 | 0.028 |
| Class B vs Class C | -0.339 | 0.534 | 0.802 |
p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Comparison of OPG levels with factors associated with CLD.
| Variables | OPG levels | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | |||
| Positive family history | Yes (n=16) | 3.54 | 1.92 | 0.979 |
| No (n=34) | 3.53 | 1.38 | ||
| Ascites | Yes (n=40) | 3.65 | 1.66 | 0.271 |
| No (n=10) | 3.04 | 0.98 | ||
| Use of Diuretics | Yes (n=24) | 3.87 | 2.02 | 0.144 |
| No (n=26) | 3.22 | 0.87 | ||
| Sodium restricted diet | Yes (n=44) | 3.53 | 1.62 | 0.958 |
| No (n=6) | 3.56 | 1.02 | ||
| Smoking | Yes (n=14) | 3.46 | 1.24 | 0.844 |
| No (n=36 | 3.56 | 1.67 | ||
| IV drug abuse | Yes (n=2) | 3.75 | 2.10 | 0.841 |
| No (n=48) | 3.52 | 1.56 | ||
| Accidental skin prick | Yes (n=13) | 4.01 | 1.57 | 0.206 |
| No (n=37) | 3.37 | 1.54 | ||
| Diabetes Mellitus | Yes (n=24) | 3.52 | 1.69 | 0.961 |
| No (n=26) | 3.54 | 1.45 | ||
| Heart failure | Yes (n=3) | 3.22 | 1.82 | 0.726 |
| No (n=47) | 3.55 | 1.56 | ||
| Renal disease | Yes (n=4) | 4.85 | 3.02 | 0.077 |
| No (n=46) | 3.42 | 1.36 | ||
| Cancer | Yes (n=3) | 2.82 | 0.33 | 0.417 |
| No (n=47) | 3.58 | 1.59 | ||
| Daily walk | Yes (n=10) | 3.61 | 2.21 | 0.857 |
| No (n=40) | 3.51 | 1.38 | ||
*p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Association of OPG with signs and symptoms of CLD.
| Signs and symptoms of CLD (no/ yes) | B[ | Exp (B)[ | p-value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splenomegaly | 0.74 | 2.10 | 0.009 | 1.20-3.69 |
| Hepatomegaly | 1.48 | 4.41 | 0.012 | 1.37-14.13 |
| Clubbing | -0.42 | 0.66 | 0.377 | 0.26-1.66 |
| Pigmentation | 0.72 | 2.06 | 0.028 | 1.08-3.94 |
| Menstrual disturbance/ Amenorrhea | 0.57 | 1.78 | 0.054 | 0.99-3.19 |
| Hemoptysis | -1.66 | 0.19 | 0.365 | 0.005-6.91 |
| Hematemesis | 0.34 | 1.40 | 0.121 | 0.91-2.17 |
| Malena | 0.63 | 1.87 | 0.018 | 1.11-3.15 |
| Epistaxis | 0.31 | 1.36 | 0.218 | 0.83-2.22 |
| Purpura | 0.25 | 1.29 | 0.254 | 0.83-2.00 |
| Petechiae | 0.31 | 1.35 | 0.178 | 0.87-2.16 |
| Bruisability | 0.13 | 1.14 | 0.524 | 0.75-1.73 |
| Prolong bleeding | 0.62 | 1.86 | 0.023 | 1.09-3.16 |
p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
B – This is the coefficient for the constant (also called the “intercept”) in the null mode.
Exp(B) – This is the exponentiation of the B coefficient, which is an odds ratio.