| Literature DB >> 32967274 |
Matthew Saive1, Manon Genva1, Thibaut Istasse2, Michel Frederich3, Chloé Maes1, Marie-Laure Fauconnier1.
Abstract
This work follows an ethnobotanical study that took place in the island of Mayotte (France), which pointed out the potential properties of Litchi chinensis Sonn. roots when used to enhance skin health and appearance. Through in vitro testing of a crude methanolic extract, high anti-tyrosinase (skin whitening effect) and antioxidant activities (skin soothing effect) could be measured. HPLC successive bio-guided fractionation steps allowed the purification of one of the compounds responsible for the biological activities. The isolated compound was characterized by UV, IR, MS and 2D-NMR, revealing, for the first time in Litchi chinensis Sonn. roots, an A-type proanthocyanidin and thus revealing a consensus among the traditional use shown by the ethnobotanical study, in vitro biological activities and chemical characterization.Entities:
Keywords: DPPH; Litchi chinensis; anti-tyrosinase activity; molecular identification; proanthocyanidins
Year: 2020 PMID: 32967274 PMCID: PMC7565872 DOI: 10.3390/biom10091347
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Picture of Litchi chinensis roots. (Credit Matthew Saive).
Main compounds found in L. chinensis with their location and identified biological activities [13].
| Compound Class/Subclass | Compound | Plant Part | Biological Activity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polyphenols | Leaves Seeds | Cytotoxic Anti-viral | |
| Tannin | Coumarin | Seeds | Antioxidant |
| Litchtocotrienol A-G | Leaves | Cytotoxic | |
| Lignan | Schizandriside | Leaves | Antioxidant |
| Lignan | Isolariciresinol | Pericarp | Antioxidant |
| Sesquiterpenes | Litchioside A and B | Seeds | Cytotoxic |
| Triterpenes | Aerial parts Seeds Pericarp | Antiviral | |
| Sterols | Aerial parts Seeds Pericarp | Antiviral | |
| Others | Litchiol A and B | Leaves Pericarp Fruits | Antioxidant |
Figure 2Chromatogram from the first fractionation process (preparative HPLC). Seventeen fractions were isolated. The peak of interest is F10 (RT = 37′49″) (shown in red).
Figure 3Chromatogram from the second fractionation process (preparative HPLC). Five fractions were isolated. The peak of interest is F10.3 (RT = 14′45″) (shown in red).
Figure 4Chromatogram from the third fractionation process (analytical HPLC with fraction collector). Five fractions were isolated. The peak of interest is F10.3.3 (RT = 43′49″) (shown in red).
Relative activity shown by the fractions retrieved after the first purification process.
| Fraction | DPPH | Tyrosinase | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibition % | SD % | Inhibition % | SD % | |
| 1 | 97.7 | 0.53 | 37.4 | 3.69 |
| 2 | 59.6 | 5.16 | 12.7 | 8.75 |
| 3 | 56.8 | 7.05 | 11.0 | 1.74 |
| 4 | 3.43 | 1.76 | 20.8 | 15.7 |
| 5 | 91.2 | 4.40 | 28.6 | 7.30 |
| 6 | 50.8 | 3.75 | 0.03 | 0.06 |
| 7 | 96.4 | 0.74 | 78.6 | 0.74 |
| 8 | 95.6 | 0.40 | 76.9 | 5.42 |
| 9 | 98.8 | 0.55 | 55.2 | 1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 | 97.5 | 0.66 | 65.2 | 1.16 |
| 12 | 22.1 | 5.35 | 6.35 | 1.07 |
| 13 | 97.5 | 0.33 | 35.8 | 4.45 |
| 14 | 96.8 | 0.64 | 77.2 | 0.19 |
| 15 | 90.0 | 9.19 | 75.6 | 2.32 |
| 16 | 89.0 | 9.91 | 28.1 | 1.71 |
| 17 | 16.9 | 4.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Relative activity shown by the fractions retrieved after the second purification process.
| Fraction | DPPH | Tyrosinase | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibition % | SD % | Inhibition % | SD % | |
| 10.1 | 28.6 | 13.2 | 35.8 | 4.45 |
| 10.2 | 18.0 | 5.07 | 57.1 | 0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10.4 | 35.3 | 22.7 | 52.5 | 3.35 |
| 10.5 | 32.0 | 15.3 | 51.9 | 3.14 |
Relative activity shown by the fractions retrieved after the third purification process.
| Fraction | DPPH | Tyrosinase | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibition % | SD % | Inhibition % | SD % | |
| 10.3.1 | 28.6 | 13.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 10.3.2 | 18.0 | 5.07 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10.3.4 | 35.3 | 22.7 | 1.18 | 1.21 |
| 10.3.5 | 32.0 | 15.28 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Figure 5FTIR spectrum.
Figure 6MS spectra of the purified molecule recorded in the positive mode.
Figure 7Two-dimensional heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) NMR spectrum of the isolated compound (right) and its hypothetical chemical structure (left). The structure proposal is based on both NMR and mass spectrometry data.
Figure 8Purified compound from the roots of L. chinensis.
Optical density at 640 nm of the fraction 10.3.3 in contact with 4-dimethylamincinnamaldehyde (DMAC).
| Observation | MeOH | DMAC 1mg/mL | HCl + EtOH | Sample | Sample + DMAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optical density | 0.00 ± 0.000 | 0.13 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.24 ± 0.00 | 0.46 ± 0.08 |