Elizabeth A Mittendorf1, Hong Zhang2, Carlos H Barrios3, Shigehira Saji4, Kyung Hae Jung5, Roberto Hegg6, Andreas Koehler7, Joohyuk Sohn8, Hiroji Iwata9, Melinda L Telli10, Cristiano Ferrario11, Kevin Punie12, Frédérique Penault-Llorca13, Shilpen Patel14, Anh Nguyen Duc15, Mario Liste-Hermoso15, Vidya Maiya14, Luciana Molinero14, Stephen Y Chui14, Nadia Harbeck16. 1. Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: emittendorf@bwh.harvard.edu. 2. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Centro de Pesquisa em Oncologia, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. 4. Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan. 5. Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 6. University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 7. Gemeinschaftspraxis für Haematologie und Onkologie Langen, Langen, Germany. 8. Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea. 9. Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan. 10. School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 11. Jewish General Hospital-McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada. 12. Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 13. Department of Biopathology, Centre Jean Perrin and University Clermont Auvergne/INSERM U1240, Clermont-Ferrand, France. 14. Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA. 15. F Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland. 16. Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Comprehensive Cancer Center of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preferred neoadjuvant regimens for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) include anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane-based chemotherapy. IMpassion031 compared efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus placebo combined with nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant treatment for early-stage TNBC. METHODS: This double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study enrolled patients in 75 academic and community sites in 13 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated stage II-III histologically documented TNBC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive chemotherapy plus intravenous atezolizumab at 840 mg or placebo every 2 weeks. Chemotherapy comprised of nab-paclitaxel at 125 mg/m2 every week for 12 weeks followed by doxorubicin at 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide at 600 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for 8 weeks, which was then followed by surgery. Stratification was by clinical breast cancer stage and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Co-primary endpoints were pathological complete response in all-randomised (ie, all randomly assigned patients in the intention-to-treat population) and PD-L1-positive (ie, patients with PD-L1-expressing tumour infiltrating immune cells covering ≥1% of tumour area) populations. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03197935), Eudra (CT2016-004734-22), and the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center (JapicCTI-173630), and is ongoing. FINDINGS:Between July 7, 2017, and Sept 24, 2019, 455 patients were recruited and assessed for eligibility. Of the 333 eligible patients, 165 were randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and 168 to placebo plus chemotherapy. At data cutoff (April 3, 2020), median follow-up was 20·6 months (IQR 8·7-24·9) in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 19·8 months (8·1-24·5) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. Pathological complete response was documented in 95 (58%, 95% CI 50-65) patients in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 69 (41%, 34-49) patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (rate difference 17%, 95% CI 6-27; one-sided p=0·0044 [significance boundary 0·0184]). In the PD-L1-positive population, pathological complete response was documented in 53 (69%, 95% CI 57-79) of 77 patients in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 37 (49%, 38-61) of 75 patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (rate difference 20%, 95% CI 4-35; one-sided p=0·021 [significance boundary 0·0184]). In the neoadjuvant phase, grade 3-4 adverse events were balanced and treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 37 (23%) and 26 (16%) patients, with one patient per group experiencing an unrelated grade 5 adverse event (traffic accident in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and pneumonia in the placebo plus chemotherapy group). INTERPRETATION: In patients with early-stage TNBC, neoadjuvant treatment with atezolizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel and anthracycline-based chemotherapy significantly improved pathological complete response rates with an acceptable safety profile. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Preferred neoadjuvant regimens for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) include anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane-based chemotherapy. IMpassion031 compared efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus placebo combined with nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant treatment for early-stage TNBC. METHODS: This double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study enrolled patients in 75 academic and community sites in 13 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated stage II-III histologically documented TNBC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive chemotherapy plus intravenous atezolizumab at 840 mg or placebo every 2 weeks. Chemotherapy comprised of nab-paclitaxel at 125 mg/m2 every week for 12 weeks followed by doxorubicin at 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide at 600 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for 8 weeks, which was then followed by surgery. Stratification was by clinical breast cancer stage and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Co-primary endpoints were pathological complete response in all-randomised (ie, all randomly assigned patients in the intention-to-treat population) and PD-L1-positive (ie, patients with PD-L1-expressing tumour infiltrating immune cells covering ≥1% of tumour area) populations. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03197935), Eudra (CT2016-004734-22), and the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center (JapicCTI-173630), and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between July 7, 2017, and Sept 24, 2019, 455 patients were recruited and assessed for eligibility. Of the 333 eligible patients, 165 were randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and 168 to placebo plus chemotherapy. At data cutoff (April 3, 2020), median follow-up was 20·6 months (IQR 8·7-24·9) in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 19·8 months (8·1-24·5) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. Pathological complete response was documented in 95 (58%, 95% CI 50-65) patients in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 69 (41%, 34-49) patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (rate difference 17%, 95% CI 6-27; one-sided p=0·0044 [significance boundary 0·0184]). In the PD-L1-positive population, pathological complete response was documented in 53 (69%, 95% CI 57-79) of 77 patients in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 37 (49%, 38-61) of 75 patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (rate difference 20%, 95% CI 4-35; one-sided p=0·021 [significance boundary 0·0184]). In the neoadjuvant phase, grade 3-4 adverse events were balanced and treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 37 (23%) and 26 (16%) patients, with one patient per group experiencing an unrelated grade 5 adverse event (traffic accident in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and pneumonia in the placebo plus chemotherapy group). INTERPRETATION: In patients with early-stage TNBC, neoadjuvant treatment with atezolizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel and anthracycline-based chemotherapy significantly improved pathological complete response rates with an acceptable safety profile. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech.
Authors: Roman M Chabanon; Mathieu Rouanne; Christopher J Lord; Jean-Charles Soria; Philippe Pasero; Sophie Postel-Vinay Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2021-08-10 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Leisha A Emens; Sylvia Adams; Ashley Cimino-Mathews; Mary L Disis; Margaret E Gatti-Mays; Alice Y Ho; Kevin Kalinsky; Heather L McArthur; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Rita Nanda; David B Page; Hope S Rugo; Krista M Rubin; Hatem Soliman; Patricia A Spears; Sara M Tolaney; Jennifer K Litton Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2021-08 Impact factor: 13.751
Authors: Larissa A Korde; Mark R Somerfield; Lisa A Carey; Jennie R Crews; Neelima Denduluri; E Shelley Hwang; Seema A Khan; Sibylle Loibl; Elizabeth A Morris; Alejandra Perez; Meredith M Regan; Patricia A Spears; Preeti K Sudheendra; W Fraser Symmans; Rachel L Yung; Brittany E Harvey; Dawn L Hershman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Victor Sarradin; Amélie Lusque; Thomas Filleron; Florence Dalenc; Camille Franchet Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Clinton Yam; Er-Yen Yen; Jeffrey T Chang; Roland L Bassett; Gheath Alatrash; Haven Garber; Lei Huo; Fei Yang; Anne V Philips; Qing-Qing Ding; Bora Lim; Naoto T Ueno; Kasthuri Kannan; Xiangjie Sun; Baohua Sun; Edwin Roger Parra Cuentas; William Fraser Symmans; Jason B White; Elizabeth Ravenberg; Sahil Seth; Jennifer L Guerriero; Gaiane M Rauch; Senthil Damodaran; Jennifer K Litton; Jennifer A Wargo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Andrew Futreal; Ignacio I Wistuba; Ryan Sun; Stacy L Moulder; Elizabeth A Mittendorf Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531