Literature DB >> 32966830

Neoadjuvant atezolizumab in combination with sequential nab-paclitaxel and anthracycline-based chemotherapy versus placebo and chemotherapy in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion031): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

Elizabeth A Mittendorf1, Hong Zhang2, Carlos H Barrios3, Shigehira Saji4, Kyung Hae Jung5, Roberto Hegg6, Andreas Koehler7, Joohyuk Sohn8, Hiroji Iwata9, Melinda L Telli10, Cristiano Ferrario11, Kevin Punie12, Frédérique Penault-Llorca13, Shilpen Patel14, Anh Nguyen Duc15, Mario Liste-Hermoso15, Vidya Maiya14, Luciana Molinero14, Stephen Y Chui14, Nadia Harbeck16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preferred neoadjuvant regimens for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) include anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane-based chemotherapy. IMpassion031 compared efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus placebo combined with nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant treatment for early-stage TNBC.
METHODS: This double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study enrolled patients in 75 academic and community sites in 13 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated stage II-III histologically documented TNBC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive chemotherapy plus intravenous atezolizumab at 840 mg or placebo every 2 weeks. Chemotherapy comprised of nab-paclitaxel at 125 mg/m2 every week for 12 weeks followed by doxorubicin at 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide at 600 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for 8 weeks, which was then followed by surgery. Stratification was by clinical breast cancer stage and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Co-primary endpoints were pathological complete response in all-randomised (ie, all randomly assigned patients in the intention-to-treat population) and PD-L1-positive (ie, patients with PD-L1-expressing tumour infiltrating immune cells covering ≥1% of tumour area) populations. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03197935), Eudra (CT2016-004734-22), and the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center (JapicCTI-173630), and is ongoing.
FINDINGS: Between July 7, 2017, and Sept 24, 2019, 455 patients were recruited and assessed for eligibility. Of the 333 eligible patients, 165 were randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and 168 to placebo plus chemotherapy. At data cutoff (April 3, 2020), median follow-up was 20·6 months (IQR 8·7-24·9) in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 19·8 months (8·1-24·5) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. Pathological complete response was documented in 95 (58%, 95% CI 50-65) patients in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 69 (41%, 34-49) patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (rate difference 17%, 95% CI 6-27; one-sided p=0·0044 [significance boundary 0·0184]). In the PD-L1-positive population, pathological complete response was documented in 53 (69%, 95% CI 57-79) of 77 patients in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 37 (49%, 38-61) of 75 patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (rate difference 20%, 95% CI 4-35; one-sided p=0·021 [significance boundary 0·0184]). In the neoadjuvant phase, grade 3-4 adverse events were balanced and treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 37 (23%) and 26 (16%) patients, with one patient per group experiencing an unrelated grade 5 adverse event (traffic accident in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and pneumonia in the placebo plus chemotherapy group).
INTERPRETATION: In patients with early-stage TNBC, neoadjuvant treatment with atezolizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel and anthracycline-based chemotherapy significantly improved pathological complete response rates with an acceptable safety profile. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32966830     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31953-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  172 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant therapy improves pCR rate.

Authors:  Peter Sidaway
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Targeting the DNA damage response in immuno-oncology: developments and opportunities.

Authors:  Roman M Chabanon; Mathieu Rouanne; Christopher J Lord; Jean-Charles Soria; Philippe Pasero; Sophie Postel-Vinay
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Leisha A Emens; Sylvia Adams; Ashley Cimino-Mathews; Mary L Disis; Margaret E Gatti-Mays; Alice Y Ho; Kevin Kalinsky; Heather L McArthur; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Rita Nanda; David B Page; Hope S Rugo; Krista M Rubin; Hatem Soliman; Patricia A Spears; Sara M Tolaney; Jennifer K Litton
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 13.751

Review 4.  Integrating Adjuvant Radiation with Post-Neoadjuvant Therapies in Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Max S Mano; Leandro Jonata C Oliveira; Samir A Hanna
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  PD-L1 in Breast Cancer: The Road to the Perfect BiomarkerIs Fraught With Uncertainty.

Authors:  Bora Lim
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Endocrine Therapy, and Targeted Therapy for Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline.

Authors:  Larissa A Korde; Mark R Somerfield; Lisa A Carey; Jennie R Crews; Neelima Denduluri; E Shelley Hwang; Seema A Khan; Sibylle Loibl; Elizabeth A Morris; Alejandra Perez; Meredith M Regan; Patricia A Spears; Preeti K Sudheendra; W Fraser Symmans; Rachel L Yung; Brittany E Harvey; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  The Landmark Series: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative and HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Roberto A Leon-Ferre; Tina J Hieken; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Immune microenvironment changes induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancers: the MIMOSA-1 study.

Authors:  Victor Sarradin; Amélie Lusque; Thomas Filleron; Florence Dalenc; Camille Franchet
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 9.  Immunotherapeutic strategies in breast cancer: A clinical update.

Authors:  Jennifer Q Zhang; George Plitas
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Immune Phenotype and Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Clinton Yam; Er-Yen Yen; Jeffrey T Chang; Roland L Bassett; Gheath Alatrash; Haven Garber; Lei Huo; Fei Yang; Anne V Philips; Qing-Qing Ding; Bora Lim; Naoto T Ueno; Kasthuri Kannan; Xiangjie Sun; Baohua Sun; Edwin Roger Parra Cuentas; William Fraser Symmans; Jason B White; Elizabeth Ravenberg; Sahil Seth; Jennifer L Guerriero; Gaiane M Rauch; Senthil Damodaran; Jennifer K Litton; Jennifer A Wargo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Andrew Futreal; Ignacio I Wistuba; Ryan Sun; Stacy L Moulder; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.