| Literature DB >> 32964598 |
Lennart J Mier1,2, Gheorghe Adam1, Sourabh Kumar1, Tim Stauch1,3,4.
Abstract
Flex-activated mechanophores can be used for small-molecule release in polymers under tension by rupture of covalent bonds that are orthogonal to the polymer main chain. Using static and dynamic quantum chemical methods, we here juxtapose three different mechanical deformation modes in flex-activated mechanophores (end-to-end stretching, direct pulling of the scissile bonds, bond angle bendings) with the aim of proposing ways to optimize the efficiency of flex-activation in experiments. It is found that end-to-end stretching, which is a traditional approach to activate mechanophores in polymers, does not trigger flex-activation, whereas direct pulling of the scissile bonds or displacement of adjacent bond angles are efficient methods to achieve this goal. Based on the structural, energetic and electronic effects responsible for these observations, we propose ways of weakening the scissile bonds experimentally to increase the efficiency of flex-activation.Entities:
Keywords: Computational Chemistry; Density Functional Theory; Flex-Activated Mechanophores; Mechanochemistry; Quantum Chemistry
Year: 2020 PMID: 32964598 PMCID: PMC7702058 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.202000739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemphyschem ISSN: 1439-4235 Impact factor: 3.102
Scheme 1Deformation schemes of the model system considered in this work that might lead to the release of furan via a retro‐[4+2] cycloaddition.
Figure 1Distribution of strain energy among selected internal coordinates of a flex‐activated mechanophore that is mechanically deformed via three different modes, as calculated with the JEDI analysis.[50–52] “Critical bonds” denote the carbon‐carbon bonds that need to be ruptured for a successful retro‐[4+2] cycloaddition. Color‐coded representations of strain energy at selected forces (modes 1 and 2) or bond angles α (mode 3) were derived by mapping strain values in bonds, bendings and torsions onto the involved covalent bonds.
Figure 2Rupture forces of the critical bonds via mode 2 when simultaneously stretching the molecule end‐to‐end (mode 1, top panel) or constraining the bond angles α (mode 3, bottom panel).
Figure 3Progression of electron density in selected bonds (1−3) when constraining the bond angles α to different values.
Figure 4Progression of the end‐to‐end‐distance (A) and the lengths of the critical bonds (B and C) when pulling the molecule apart at the methyl groups during steered Born‐Oppenheimer Molecular Dynamics simulations at different temperatures. Each colored line corresponds to one simulation.