| Literature DB >> 32963637 |
Yuzhen Xu1, Qian Wang2, Jianxin Chen3, Yihong Ma4, Xueyuan Liu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cerebral ischemic stroke is one of the severe diseases with a pathological condition that leads to nerve cell dysfunction with seldom available therapy options. Currently, there are few proven effective treatments available for improving cerebral ischemic stroke outcome. However, recently, there is increasing evidence that inhibition of histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity exerts a strong protective effect in in vivo and vitro models of ischemic stroke. Review Summary. HDAC is a posttranslational modification that is negatively regulated by histone acetyltransferase (HATS) and histone deacetylase. Based on function and DNA sequence similarity, histone deacetylases (HDACs) are organized into four different subclasses (I-IV). Modifications of histones play a crucial role in cerebral ischemic affair development after translation by modulating disrupted acetylation homeostasis. HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) mainly exert neuroprotective effects by enhancing histone and nonhistone acetylation levels and enhancing gene expression and protein modification functions. This article reviews HDAC and its inhibitors, hoping to find meaningful therapeutic targets.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32963637 PMCID: PMC7492879 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8820803
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Figure 1Overview of the probable mechanism between HDACs and their inhibitors. Due to the different distributions of HDACs in the cytoplasm and nuclei, the related mechanisms of cerebral ischemia show the different types. When cerebral infraction occurred, HDAC 1 and 2 in the nucleus were released into the cytoplasm that caused homeostasis of the cellular environment to be destroyed. It will continuously lead to the degradation of DNA. Meanwhile, HDAC 3, 4, 5, and 9 would participate in apoptosis, inflammation response, and Golgi apparatus dysfunction as well as autophagy, which is particularly apparent in HDAC9, respectively. Moreover, HDAC NAD+-dependent class III (SIRT1) could aggravate the ischemic injury p53 acetylation and NF-κB.
Primary HDAC and HDAC inhibitors in cerebral ischemia.
| HDAC classification | HDAC inhibitors | Location | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zinc-dependent class I | HDAC 1 | MS-275, FK-288, TSA, VPA, Scriptaid | NU |
| HDAC 2 | FK-288, SAHA, SB, Scriptaid | NU | |
| HDAC 3 | MGCD0103, Scriptaid | NU/CM | |
| HDAC 8 | / | NU/CM | |
|
| |||
| Zinc-dependent class II (class IIa) | HDAC 4 | TSA, 4-PBA | NU/CM |
| HDAC 5 | / | NU/CM | |
| HDAC 7 | / | NU/CM | |
| HDAC 9 | / | NU/CM | |
|
| |||
| Zinc-dependent class II (class IIb) | HDAC 6 | Tubacin, SAHA | CM |
|
| |||
| NAD+-dependent class III (sirtuins) | SIRT1 | Sirtinol | NU |
| SIRT2 | AKG2 | NU/CM | |
| SIRT3 | / | Mitochondria | |
NU: nucleus; CM: cytoplasm.
Figure 2Primary structural formula of HDAC inhibitors in cerebral ischemia.