Literature DB >> 32959047

Effects of Age on Prestimulus Neural Activity Predictive of Successful Memory Encoding: An fMRI Study.

E Song Liu1,2, Joshua D Koen3, Michael D Rugg1,2,4.   

Abstract

Prestimulus subsequent memory effects (SMEs)-differences in neural activity preceding the onset of study items that are predictive of later memory performance-have consistently been reported in young adults. The present functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment investigated potential age-related differences in prestimulus SMEs. During study, healthy young and older participants made one of two semantic judgments on images, with the judgment signaled by a preceding cue. In test phase, participants first made an item recognition judgment and, for each item judged old, a source memory judgment. Age-invariant prestimulus SMEs were observed in left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, left hippocampus, and right subgenual cortex. In each case, the effects reflected lower blood oxygen level dependent signal for later recognized items, regardless of source accuracy, than for unrecognized items. A similar age-invariant pattern was observed in left orbitofrontal cortex, but this effect was specific to items attracting a correct source response compared to unrecognized items. In contrast, the left angular gyrus and fusiform cortex demonstrated negative prestimulus SMEs that were exclusive to young participants. The findings indicate that age differences in prestimulus SMEs are regionally specific and suggest that prestimulus SMEs reflect multiple cognitive processes, only some of which are vulnerable to advancing age.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; episodic memory; preparation; prestimulus; proactive control; subsequent memory effect

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32959047      PMCID: PMC7906785          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  57 in total

1.  Level of sustained entorhinal activity at study correlates with subsequent cued-recall performance: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study with high acquisition rate.

Authors:  G Fernández; J B Brewer; Z Zhao; G H Glover; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  When more means less: neural activity related to unsuccessful memory encoding.

Authors:  L J Otten; M D Rugg
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Memory encoding and aging: a neurocognitive perspective.

Authors:  Fergus I M Craik; Nathan S Rose
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  Memory aging and brain maintenance.

Authors:  Lars Nyberg; Martin Lövdén; Katrine Riklund; Ulman Lindenberger; Lars Bäckman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Alterations in cerebral metabolic rate and blood supply across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Hanzhang Lu; Feng Xu; Karen M Rodrigue; Kristen M Kennedy; Yamei Cheng; Blair Flicker; Andrew C Hebrank; Jinsoo Uh; Denise C Park
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  W D Spencer; N Raz
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1995-12

7.  The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework.

Authors:  Todd S Braver
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Memory function in normal aging.

Authors:  Lars-Göran Nilsson
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand Suppl       Date:  2003

9.  Age-related Differences in Prestimulus Subsequent Memory Effects Assessed with Event-related Potentials.

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Erin D Horne; Nedra Hauck; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Cerebral aging: integration of brain and behavioral models of cognitive function.

Authors:  D C Park; T A Polk; J A Mikels; S F Taylor; C Marshuetz
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.