Literature DB >> 11591321

When more means less: neural activity related to unsuccessful memory encoding.

L J Otten1, M D Rugg.   

Abstract

The neural correlates of memory encoding have been studied by contrasting neural activity elicited by items at the time of learning according to whether they were later remembered or forgotten [1]. Previous studies have focused on regions where neural activity is greater for subsequently remembered items [2-8]. Here, we describe regions where activity is greater for subsequently forgotten items. In two experiments that employed the same incidental learning task, activity in an overlapping set of cortical regions (posterior cingulate, inferior and medial parietal, and dorsolateral prefrontal) was associated with failure on a subsequent memory test.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11591321     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00454-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  75 in total

1.  What neural correlates underlie successful encoding and retrieval? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study using a divided attention paradigm.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kensinger; Richard J Clarke; Suzanne Corkin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Theta power during encoding predicts subsequent-memory performance and default mode network deactivation.

Authors:  Thomas P White; Marije Jansen; Kathrin Doege; Karen J Mullinger; S Bert Park; Elizabeth B Liddle; Penny A Gowland; Susan T Francis; Richard Bowtell; Peter F Liddle
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Increase in posterior alpha activity during rehearsal predicts successful long-term memory formation of word sequences.

Authors:  Esther B Meeuwissen; Atsuko Takashima; Guillén Fernández; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Brain connectivity related to working memory performance.

Authors:  Michelle Hampson; Naomi R Driesen; Pawel Skudlarski; John C Gore; R Todd Constable
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Brain networks subserving the extraction of sentence information and its encoding to memory.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Howard C Nusbaum; Steven L Small
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Neural mechanisms of internal distraction suppression in visual attention.

Authors:  Abhijit Rajan; Sreenivasan Meyyappan; Harrison Walker; Immanuel Babu Henry Samuel; Zhenhong Hu; Mingzhou Ding
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex contributes to successful relational memory encoding.

Authors:  Linda J Murray; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Age-related memory impairment associated with loss of parietal deactivation but preserved hippocampal activation.

Authors:  Saul L Miller; Kim Celone; Kristina DePeau; Eli Diamond; Bradford C Dickerson; Dorene Rentz; Maija Pihlajamäki; Reisa A Sperling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The encoding/retrieval flip: interactions between memory performance and memory stage and relationship to intrinsic cortical networks.

Authors:  Willem Huijbers; Aaron P Schultz; Patrizia Vannini; Donald G McLaren; Sarah E Wigman; Andrew M Ward; Trey Hedden; Reisa A Sperling
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Figural memory performance and functional magnetic resonance imaging activity across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Sharna Jamadar; Michal Assaf; Kanchana Jagannathan; Karen Anderson; Godfrey D Pearlson
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.