Literature DB >> 32958927

Small-scale population divergence is driven by local larval environment in a temperate amphibian.

Patrik Rödin-Mörch1, Hugo Palejowski2, Maria Cortazar-Chinarro3, Simon Kärvemo3,4, Alex Richter-Boix3, Jacob Höglund3, Anssi Laurila3.   

Abstract

Genomic variation within and among populations is shaped by the interplay between natural selection and the effects of genetic drift and gene flow. Adaptive divergence can be found in small-scale natural systems even when population sizes are small, and the potential for gene flow is high, suggesting that local environments exert selection pressures strong enough to counteract the opposing effects of drift and gene flow. Here, we investigated genomic differentiation in nine moor frog (Rana arvalis) populations in a small-scale network of local wetlands using 16,707 ddRAD-seq SNPs, relating levels of differentiation with local environments, as well as with properties of the surrounding landscape. We characterized population structure and differentiation, and partitioned the effects of geographic distance, local larval environment, and landscape features on total genomic variation. We also conducted gene-environment association studies using univariate and multivariate approaches. We found small-scale population structure corresponding to 6-8 clusters. Local larval environment was the most influential component explaining 2.3% of the total genetic variation followed by landscape features (1.8%) and geographic distance (0.8%), indicative of isolation-by-environment, -by-landscape, and -by-distance, respectively. We identified 1000 potential candidate SNPs putatively under divergent selection mediated by the local larval environment. The candidate SNPs were involved in, among other biological functions, immune system function and development. Our results suggest that small-scale environmental differences can exert selection pressures strong enough to counteract homogenizing effects of gene flow and drift in this small-scale system, leading to observable population differentiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32958927      PMCID: PMC8027893          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-020-00371-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  70 in total

1.  Selection for migration modification.

Authors:  B J Balkau; M W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Adaptation from standing genetic variation.

Authors:  Rowan D H Barrett; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Phenotype-dependent native habitat preference facilitates divergence between parapatric lake and stream stickleback.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Lisa K Snowberg; Claire Patenia; William E Stutz; Travis Ingram; On Lee Lau
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Winter storms drive rapid phenotypic, regulatory, and genomic shifts in the green anole lizard.

Authors:  Shane C Campbell-Staton; Zachary A Cheviron; Nicholas Rochette; Julian Catchen; Jonathan B Losos; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Evaluation of redundancy analysis to identify signatures of local adaptation.

Authors:  Thibaut Capblancq; Keurcien Luu; Michael G B Blum; Eric Bazin
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2018-06-17       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  Effects of prolactin and growth hormone on growth and metamorphosis of tadpoles of the frog, Rana pipiens.

Authors:  P S Brown; B E Frye
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 2.822

7.  Gene Flow Limits Adaptation along Steep Environmental Gradients.

Authors:  Judith C Bachmann; Alexandra Jansen van Rensburg; Maria Cortazar-Chinarro; Anssi Laurila; Josh Van Buskirk
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Deconstructing isolation-by-distance: The genomic consequences of limited dispersal.

Authors:  Stepfanie M Aguillon; John W Fitzpatrick; Reed Bowman; Stephan J Schoech; Andrew G Clark; Graham Coop; Nancy Chen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Disease risk in temperate amphibian populations is higher at closed-canopy sites.

Authors:  C Guilherme Becker; David Rodriguez; Ana V Longo; Amanda L Talaba; Kelly R Zamudio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The magnitude of local adaptation under genotype-dependent dispersal.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  1 in total

1.  Genomic signatures of thermal adaptation are associated with clinal shifts of life history in a broadly distributed frog.

Authors:  Hugo Cayuela; Yann Dorant; Brenna R Forester; Dan L Jeffries; Rebecca M Mccaffery; Lisa A Eby; Blake R Hossack; Jérôme M W Gippet; David S Pilliod; W Chris Funk
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.606

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.