| Literature DB >> 32957918 |
Yue Hu1, Yihe Zhang1, Cong Liu1, Rui Qin1, Desheng Gong1, Ru Wang2, Du Zhang1, Lianqiang Che2, Daiwen Chen2, Guizhong Xin3, Fei Gao1,4, Qi Hu5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In order to study the relations of hepatocellular functions, weight gain and metabolic imbalance caused by low-dose antibiotics (LDA) via epigenetic regulation of gene transcription, 32 weaned piglets were employed as animal models and randomly allocated into two groups with diets supplemented with 0 or LDA (chlorotetracycline and virginiamycin).Entities:
Keywords: Liver methylome; Liver transcriptome; Low-dose antibiotics; Serum lipidome; Weaned piglets
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32957918 PMCID: PMC7507292 DOI: 10.1186/s12863-020-00918-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Fig. 1Growth phenotypes of piglets from the LDA and CON groups. Box plots of body weight (a), average daily feed intake (b), diarrhoea index (c) and relative weight (RW) of different organs (d) during the 4 weeks of the experimental period between the LDA and CON groups (two-tailed independent t-test, *P-value< 0.05, **P-value< 0.01). RW was obtained from absolute organ weight divided by body weight. The diarrhoea index was expressed as the average daily grade of diarrhoea (three check points per day)
Fig. 2Lipidome comparison showed that altered lipids were mainly involved in glycerophospholipid metabolism. a Orthogonal partial least square discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) of serum lipidome between the CON group (green circle) and LDA group (blue box). b Heatmap showing the concentrations of all 38 differential lipids between the two groups. The bars on top of the heatmap display the cluster result of these lipids. c KEGG pathway analysis of the differential lipids by MetaboAnalyst (http://www.MetaboAnalyst.ca/)
Fig. 3Comparison of the transcriptome of liver samples between the LDA and CON groups. a Hierarchical clustering analyses of total gene expression levels from LDA and CON groups by the “Pvclust” algorithm. The approximately unbiased (AU) P-value (%) and bootstrap probability (BP) P-value are shown. b Scatter plot of the average expression levels of all DEGs. c Covariate analysis between the transcriptome data from the two groups. d Violin plots of expression levels from the three key DEGs (ALOX15, NNMT and CXCL10) in the two groups. Black bars indicate the boxplot, and white dots indicate the mean value. e Correlation networks of DEGs and differential lipids. Correlation analysis among them is shown in this network. The cyan blocks present DEGs and the green circles are lipids. The blue lines indicate positive correlations and the red lines are negative correlations. And lines with different degrees of thickness indicate different degrees of correlations between these DEGs and lipids
Fig. 4Comparison of promoter methylome of liver samples between the LDA and CON groups. a Hierarchical clustering analysis of the average DNA methylation levels in promoter regions by the “Pvclust” algorithm. The approximately unbiased (AU) P-value (%) and bootstrap probability (BP) P-value are shown. b Scatter plot of the average methylation levels of DMRs in the LDA and CON groups. c The pie chart showing the distribution of DMRs in different chromosomes. d KEGG pathways enriched by the DMR-associated genes