| Literature DB >> 32957514 |
Oumar Bobbo Modibo1,2, Ndjana Nkoulou Ii Joseph Emmanuel1, Olga German3, Kountchou Noube Michaux1, Hamadou Yerima Abba1.
Abstract
The current work deals with indoor radon (222Rn) concentrations and ambient dose-equivalent rate measurements in the bauxite-bearing areas of the Adamawa region in Cameroon before mining from 2022. In total, 90 Electret Ionization Chambers (EIC) (commercially, EPERM) and 175 Radon Track Detectors (commercially, RADTRAK2) were used to measure 222Rn concentrations in dwellings of four localities of the above region. A pocket survey meter (RadEye PRD-ER, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for the ambient dose-equivalent rate measurements. These measurements were followed by calculations of annual doses from inhalation and external exposure. 222Rn concentrations were found to vary between 36 ± 8-687 ± 35 Bq m-3 with a geometric mean (GM) of 175 ± 16 Bq m-3 and 43 ± 12-270 ± 40 Bq m-3 with a geometric mean of 101 ± 21 Bq m-3 by using EPERM and RADTRAK, respectively. According to RADTRAK data, 51% of dwellings have radon concentrations above the reference level of 100 Bq m-3 recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). The ambient dose equivalent rate ranged between 0.04-0.17 µSv h-1 with the average value of 0.08 µSv h-1. The inhalation dose and annual external effective dose to the public were assessed and found to vary between 0.8-5 mSv with an average value of 2 mSv and 0.3-1.8 mSv with an average value of 0.7 mSv, respectively. Most of the average values in terms of concentration and radiation dose were found to be above the corresponding world averages given by the United Nations Scientific Commission on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Even though the current exposure of members of the public to natural radiation is not critical, the situation could change abruptly when mining starts.Entities:
Keywords: bauxite; electret ionization chamber; external dose; inhalation dose; radon; radon track detector
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32957514 PMCID: PMC7558957 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17186776
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Location map of the bauxite bearing areas of southern Adamawa.
Figure 2Distribution of radon in dwellings of Tibati (A) and Ngaoundal (B) using EPERM detectors.
Figure 3Lognormal distribution of 222Rn in houses of Ngaoundal (A) and Tibati (B) using RADTRAK detectors. The numbers of houses are 48 and 56 in Ngaoundal and Tibati, respectively.
Activity concentrations of 222Rn determined by using Radon Track (RADTRAK) detectors. AM: arithmetic mean, SD: standard deviation, GM: geometric mean, GSD: geometric standard deviation, N: number of dwellings.
| Statistical Parameters | Radon Concentration (Bq m−3) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ngaoundal | Tibati | Tongo | Minim | Whole Study Area | |
| Range | 68–262 | 56–270 | 72–174 | 43–172 | 43–270 |
| AM ± SD | 131 ± 25 | 99 ± 21 | 107 ± 22 | 91 ± 19 | 108 ± 22 |
| GM ± GSD | 123 ± 24 | 93 ± 20 | 105 ± 21 | 85 ± 18 | 102 ± 21 |
| Median | 123 | 94 | 104 | 82 | 100 |
| N | 48 | 56 | 31 | 32 | 167 |
Figure 4Lognormal distribution (A) of indoor 222Rn in the bauxite-bearing Southern Adamawa. Boxplot distribution (B) is made for each study area and the whole bauxite-bearing areas. The total number of RADTRAK detectors analyzed was 169. Box plot refers to median, lower and upper quartiles. Outliers are shown on either side of the rectangular box at the limit of the vertical line. The small filled circle above the median represents the arithmetic mean.
Figure 5Correlation between indoor ambient-equivalent dose rate and indoor radon in the bauxite-bearing areas of southern Adamawa.
Ratio (RADTRAK/ EPERM) activity concentrations of indoor 222Rn and Z-score test.
| 222Rn Concentration (Bq m−3) by EPERM | 222Rn Concentration | Type | Ratio (RADTRAK/EPERM | Z-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36 ± 8 | 43 ± 12 | Minimum | 0.80 | −0.48 |
| 687 ± 35 | 270 ± 40 | Maximum | 2.50 | 7.8 |
| 233 ± 20 | 108 ± 22 | Arithmetic mean | 2.20 | 4.23 |
| 175 ± 16 | 101 ± 21 | Geometric mean | 1.70 | 2.8 |
External and inhalation dose to members of the public in the bauxite-bearing areas of Southern Adamawa. AM: arithmetic mean, SD: standard deviation, GM: geometric mean, GSD: geometric standard deviation, N: number of dwellings.
| Statistical Parameters | External Effective Dose (mSv) | Inhalation Dose (mSv) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor (Out) | Indoor (In) | Total Dose | |||
| Ngaoundal | Range | 0.20–0.70 | 0.39–1.07 | 0.64–1.77 | 1.29–4.96 |
| AM ± SD | 0.31 ± 0.08 | 0.56 ± 0.12 | 0.86 ± 0.18 | 2.43 ± 0.87 | |
| GM(GSD) | 0.30 ± 1.24 | 0.54 ± 1.20 | 0.85 ± 1.18 | 2.30 ± 1.38 | |
| Median | 0.30 | 0.53 | 0.82 | 2.26 | |
|
| 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | |
| Tibati | Range | 0.18–0.30 | 0.28–0.54 | 0.50–0.84 | 1.06–5.04 |
| AM ± SD | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.62 ± 0.06 | 1.87 ± 0.72 | |
| GM(GSD) | 0.23 ± 1.14 | 0.39 ± 1.14 | 0.62 ± 1.12 | 1.77 ± 1.39 | |
| Median | 0.23 | 0.38 | 0.62 | 1.78 | |
|
| 56 | 56 | 56 | 56 | |
| Tongo | Range | 0.21–0.35 | 0.35–0.63 | 0.63–0.94 | 1.36–3.30 |
| AM ± SD | 0.27 ± 0.03 | 0.50 ± 0.07 | 0.77 ± 0.08 | 2.03 ± 0.40 | |
| GM(GSD) | 0.27 ± 1.13 | 0.49 ± 1.16 | 0.77 ± 1.10 | 1.99 ± 1.21 | |
| Median | 0.28 | 0.49 | 0.78 | 1.97 | |
|
| 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | |
| Minim | Range | 0.07–0.26 | 0.23–0.44 | 0.30–0.68 | 0.81–3.26 |
| AM ± SD | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.05 | 0.48 ± 0.07 | 1.72 ± 0.62 | |
| GM(GSD) | 0.17 ± 1.26 | 0.31 ± 1.16 | 0.48 ± 1.17 | 1.62 ± 1.43 | |
| Median | 0.18 | 0.30 | 0.48 | 1.55 | |
|
| 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | |
| Whole study area | Range | 0.07–0.70 | 0.23–1.70 | 0.30–1.77 | 0.81–5.04 |
| AM ± SD | 0.25 ± 0.07 | 0.44 ± 0.11 | 0.70 ± 0.18 | 2.03 ± 0.75 | |
| GM(GSD) | 0.24 ± 1.32 | 0.43 ± 1.30 | 0.67 ± 1.28 | 1.92 ± 1.40 | |
| Median | 0.25 | 0.43 | 0.68 | 1.90 | |
|
| 166 | 166 | 166 | 166 | |
Figure 6Lognormal distribution of inhalation dose due to 222Rn in dwellings in the bauxite-bearing areas of Southern Adamawa.