Literature DB >> 32955762

Periodontal phenotype: A review of historical and current classifications evaluating different methods and characteristics.

Violeta Malpartida-Carrillo1, Pedro Luis Tinedo-Lopez1, Maria Eugenia Guerrero2, Silvia P Amaya-Pajares3, Mutlu Özcan4, Cassiano Kuchenbecker Rösing5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the historical and current periodontal phenotype classifications evaluating methods and characteristics. Moreover, to identify and classify the methods based on periodontal phenotype components. OVERVIEW: Several gingival morphology studies have been frequently associated with different terms used causing confusion among the readers. In 2017, the World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions recommended to adopt the term "periodontal phenotype". This term comprises two terms, gingival phenotype (gingival thickness and keratinized tissue width) and bone morphotype (buccal bone plate thickness). Furthermore, gingival morphology has been categorized on "thin-scalloped", "thick-scalloped" and "thick-flat" considering the periodontal biotype. However, by definition, the term phenotype is preferred over biotype. Periodontal phenotype can be evaluated through clinical or radiographic assessments and may be divided into invasive/non-invasive (for gingival thickness), static/functional (for keratinized tissue width), and bi/tridimensional (for buccal bone plate thickness) methods.
CONCLUSIONS: "Thin-scalloped," "thick-scalloped," and "thick-flat" periodontal biotypes were identified. These three periodontal biotypes have been considered in the World Workshop but the term periodontal phenotype is recommended. Periodontal phenotype is the combination of the gingival phenotype and the bone morphotype. There are specific methods for periodontal phenotype evaluation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The term periodontal phenotype is currently recommended for future investigations about gingival phenotype and bone morphotype. "Thin-scalloped," "thick-scalloped," and "thick-flat" periodontal phenotypes can be evaluated through specific methods for gingival thickness, keratinized tissue width, and buccal bone plate thickness evaluation.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Keywords:  implants; periodontics; periodontics/prosthodontics; radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32955762     DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent        ISSN: 1496-4155            Impact factor:   2.843


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of gingival thickness in the maxillary anterior region using different techniques.

Authors:  Mediha Nur Nisanci Yilmaz; Cansu Koseoglu Secgin; Mehmet Ozgur Ozemre; Elif İnonu; Serhat Aslan; Sule Bulut
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Gingivectomy with high-power laser for correction of the gummy smile resulting from altered passive eruption-a case series.

Authors:  Diego Filipe Bezerra Silva; Gustavo Araújo de Freitas; Luzia Lara Coura Carvalho Leite; Keila Cristina Raposo Lucena; Daliana Queiroga de Castro Gomes
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 2.555

3.  Gingival shape analysis using surface curvature estimation of the intraoral scans.

Authors:  Marko Kuralt; Alja Cmok Kučič; Rok Gašperšič; Jan Grošelj; Marjeta Knez; Aleš Fidler
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Evaluation of the Hyaluronic Acid Versus the Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin in the Management of the Thin Gingival Phenotype: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Nai H Faour; Suleiman Dayoub; Mohammad Y Hajeer
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-18

5.  Gingival phenotype distribution in young Caucasian women and men - An investigative study.

Authors:  Kai R Fischer; Jasmin Büchel; Frederic Kauffmann; Christian Heumann; Anton Friedmann; Patrick R Schmidlin
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-11-11

6.  Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Ultrasonic Method and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Combined with Intraoral Scanning and Prosthetic-Driven Implant Planning Method in Determining the Gingival Phenotype in the Healthy Periodontium.

Authors:  Magdalena Bednarz-Tumidajewicz; Aneta Furtak; Aneta Zakrzewska; Małgorzata Rąpała; Karolina Gerreth; Tomasz Gedrange; Wojciech Bednarz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Gingival phenotype assessment methods and classifications revisited: a preclinical study.

Authors:  Kai R Fischer; Jasmin Büchel; Tiziano Testori; Giulio Rasperini; Thomas Attin; Patrick Schmidlin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.573

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.