| Literature DB >> 32954888 |
Xinyuan Zhang1, Yuntao Wu2, Muzi Na1, Alice H Lichtenstein3, Aijun Xing2, Shuohua Chen4, Shouling Wu2, Xiang Gao1.
Abstract
Background Night eating has been associated with an elevated risk of obesity, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease. However, there is no longitudinal study on whether habitual night eating, regardless of diet quality and energy intake, is associated with arterial stiffness, a major etiological factor in the development of cardiovascular disease. Methods and Results The study included 7771 adult participants without cardiovascular disease, cancer, or diabetes mellitus prior to dietary assessment by a validated food frequency questionnaire in 2014 through 2015. Participants were categorized into 3 groups based on self-reported night-eating habits: never or rarely, some days (1-5 times per week), or most days (6+ times per week). Arterial stiffness was assessed by brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity at baseline and repeatedly during follow-ups. Mean differences and 95% CIs in the yearly change rate of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity across the 3 groups were calculated, adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic status, total energy intake, diet quality, sleep quality, and other cardiovascular disease risk factors. At baseline, 6625 (85.2%), 610 (7.8%), and 536 (6.9%) participants reported night eating as never or rarely, some days, or most days, respectively. During a mean 3.19 years, we observed a positive association between night-eating frequency and progression of arterial stiffness (P trend=0.01). The adjusted difference in brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity change rate between the group that ate at night most days and the group that never or rarely ate at night was 14.1 (95% CI, 0.6-27.5) cm/s per year. This association was only significant in women, but not in men (P interaction=0.03). Conclusions In an adult population free of major chronic diseases, habitual night eating was positively associated with the progression of arterial stiffness, a hallmark of arteriosclerosis and biological aging. Registration URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifier: ChiCTR-TNRC-11001489.Entities:
Keywords: arterial stiffness; meal timing; night eating; pulse wave velocity
Year: 2020 PMID: 32954888 PMCID: PMC7792372 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Heart Assoc ISSN: 2047-9980 Impact factor: 5.501
Figure 1Flow chart of this study.
BaPWV indicates brachial‐ankle pulse wave velocity; CVD, cardiovascular disease, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure; and FFQ, food frequency questionnaire.
Baseline Characteristics Across Night‐Eating Habits
| Night Eating |
Never or Rarely (n=6625) |
Some Days (n=610) |
Most Days (n=536) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 46.1±10.5 | 42.4±8.7 | 44.1±9.3 | <0.001 |
| Male, % | 69.7 | 80.5 | 82.1 | <0.001 |
| College or above, % | 17.6 | 18.4 | 11.6 | 0.03 |
| Manual labor, % | 80.5 | 81.6 | 89.0 | 0.002 |
| Married, % | 95.2 | 91.5 | 94.6 | 0.02 |
| Current smoker, % | 39.7 | 50.3 | 42.6 | <0.001 |
| Current drinker, % | 35.8 | 57.2 | 46.4 | <0.001 |
| Physical exercise, % | 24.1 | 24.3 | 25.6 | 0.009 |
| Antihypertensive drug, % | 10.1 | 6.6 | 7.4 | 0.006 |
| Sleep duration, h | 7.86±1.61 | 7.83±1.68 | 8.05±1.91 | 0.04 |
| Insomnia, % | 4.6 | 11.1 | 6.1 | <0.001 |
| Frequent snoring, % | 11.1 | 14.9 | 11.0 | 0.02 |
| Everyday breakfast, % | 82.9 | 61.5 | 82.8 | <0.001 |
| Total energy intake, kcal/d | 1668±562 | 1724±624 | 1685±559 | 0.08 |
| DASH diet‐quality score | 26.1±4.7 | 26.1±4.5 | 26.1±4.6 | 0.91 |
| baPWV, cm/s | 1408±275 | 1385±241 | 1401±234 | 0.10 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 24.8±3.3 | 24.9±3.3 | 24.4±3.1 | 0.02 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 130±17 | 129±15 | 129±16 | 0.05 |
| Fasting blood glucose, mmol/L | 5.31±0.61 | 5.25±0.63 | 5.30±0.62 | 0.13 |
| Low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, mmol/L | 2.96±0.76 | 2.86±0.76 | 2.87±0.72 | <0.001 |
| High‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, mmol/L | 1.41±0.43 | 1.40±0.60 | 1.40±0.34 | 0.71 |
baPWV indicates brachial‐ankle pulse wave velocity; and DASH, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension.
Difference of Brachial‐Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity Change Rate (cm/s per year) According to Night‐Eating Frequency in Women, Men, and Total Participants
| Never or Rarely | Some Days | Most Days |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women (n=2222) | ||||
| N | 2007 | 119 | 96 | |
| Model 1 | 0 (reference) | 36.1 (11.3–61.0) | 27.2 (0–54.5) | 0.003 |
| Model 2 | 0 (reference) | 38.8 (13.1–64.5) | 29.8 (1.7–57.9) | 0.002 |
| Model 3 | 0 (reference) | 34.2 (7.5–61.0) | 34.3 (4.7–64.0) | 0.002 |
| Model 4 | 0 (reference) | 32.5 (5.0–59.9) | 35.1 (5.4–64.8) | 0.002 |
| Further adjusting for menopausal status | 0 (reference) | 32.2 (4.7–59.6) | 35.1 (5.3–64.8) | 0.003 |
| Men (n=5549) | ||||
| N | 4618 | 491 | 440 | |
| Model 1 | 0 (reference) | 3.4 (−10.2 to 17.1) | 4.3 (−9.7 to 18.3) | 0.47 |
| Model 2 | 0 (reference) | 1.9 (−11.0 to 15.7) | 4.0 (−10.1 to 18.1) | 0.55 |
| Model 3 | 0 (reference) | −0.1 (−14.8 to 14.5) | 6.9 (−8.2 to 22.0) | 0.43 |
| Model 4 | 0 (reference) | 4.1 (−11.3 to 19.5) | 6.3 (−8.9 to 21.4) | 0.36 |
| Total (n=7771) | 6625 | 610 | 536 | |
| Model 1 | 0 (reference) | 11.0 (−0.9 to 22.9) | 9.8 (−2.6 to 22.3) | 0.04 |
| Model 2 | 0 (reference) | 10.4 (−1.8 to 22.5) | 10.0 (−2.6 to 22.6) | 0.04 |
| Model 3 | 0 (reference) | 8.9 (−4.0 to 21.7) | 14.3 (0.9–27.8) | 0.02 |
| Model 4 | 0 (reference) | 12.2 (−1.2 to 25.6) | 14.1 (0.6–27.5) | 0.01 |
Model 1 adjusted for age and sex; model 2 further adjusted for baseline brachial‐ankle pulse wave velocity, total energy intake (quartiles), and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet‐quality score; model 3 further adjusted for physical activity (low, moderate, or high), marriage (single or married), employment (blue‐collar or white‐collar worker), education level (high school and below, or college and above), alcohol consumption (yes/no), smoking status (yes/no), antihypertensive drug (yes/no), body mass index (quintile), systolic blood pressure (quintile), fasting blood glucose (quintile), low‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol (quintile) and high‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol (quintile); model 4 further adjusted for sleep duration (hours), insomnia (yes/no), snoring (yes/no), and breakfast frequency. Menopause status was categorized as no menopause, developed menopause, or postmenopausal during follow‐up.
P difference <0.05 compared with “never or rarely” ate‐at‐night group.
Values are adjusted mean differences (95% CIs).
Sensitivity Analyses of Adjusted Difference of Brachial‐Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity Change Rate (cm/s per year) According to Night‐Eating Frequency
|
Never or Rarely (n=6625) |
Some Days (n=610) |
Most Days (n=536) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Propensity score adjusted (n=7771) | 0 (reference) | 8.6 (0.9–16.3) | 8.8 (0.7–17.0) | 0.01 |
| Excluding repeated measurement in <1 y | 0 (reference) | |||
| Women (n=2062) | 0 (reference) | 4.5 (−17.6 to 26.6) | 23.1 (−0.2 to 46.4) | 0.05 |
| Men (n=4809) | 0 (reference) | −3.2 (−12.7 to 6.4) | 5.9 (−3.1 to 15.0) | 0.35 |
| Total (n=6871) | 0 (reference) | −0.1 (−9.4 to 9.1) | 10.4 (1.4–19.4) | 0.04 |
| Excluding participants with insomnia | ||||
| Women (n=2026) | 0 (reference) | 33.5 (3.7–63.4) | 35.0 (3.1–66.9) | 0.005 |
| Men (n=5341) | 0 (reference) | 3.9 (−12.5 to 20.3) | 6.1 (−9.5 to 21.7) | 0.39 |
| Total (n=7367) | 0 (reference) | 11.6 (−2.8 to 25.9) | 13.6 (−0.4 to 27.7) | 0.02 |
Model adjusted for age, baseline brachial‐ankle pulse wave velocity, total energy intake (quartiles), Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet‐quality score, physical activity (low, moderate, or high), marriage (single or married), employment (blue‐collar or white‐collar worker), education level (high school and below, or college and above), alcohol consumption (yes/no), smoking status (yes/no), antihypertensive drug (yes/no), body mass index (quintile), systolic blood pressure (quintile), fasting blood glucose quintile), low‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol (quintile), high‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol (quintile), sleep duration (hours), insomnia (yes/no), snoring (yes/no), and breakfast frequency.
P difference <0.05 compared with the “never or rarely” ate‐at‐night group.
Values are adjusted mean differences (95% CIs).