| Literature DB >> 32952742 |
Hui-Min Ma1,2, Meng Yu1,2, Cong Wu3, Hou-Bao Huang4, Ya-Wei Li4, Peng Zhang1, Jian-Jun Huang1, Long Cheng1,2, Gang Feng1,2, Guo-Rong Li5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The spondin-2 (SPON2) gene is overexpressed in multiple malignant tumors and may promote tumor aggressiveness. However, its expression profile and functional roles in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are still unclear.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32952742 PMCID: PMC7487092 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5074239
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Figure 1SPON2 expression in ccRCC and normal tissues. (a) TCGA ccRCC dataset. (b) GSE53757.
Figure 2SPON2 expression in ccRCC and cell lines. (a) Representative SPON2 histologic scoring in ccRCC tissues. (b) SPON2 mRNA expression in three cell lines. (c) SPON2 protein expression in three cell lines. (d) The protein levels of SPON2 in Caki-1cells after knockdown by siRNA-SPON2 were detected by western blot.
The expression of SPON2 protein in ccRCC tissue and paired adjacent normal tissue.
| Type of tissue | No. | SPON2 immunostaining (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | 1+ | 2+ | ||
| ccRCC tissue | 94 | 45 | 43 | 6 |
| Adjacent normal tissue | 94 | 72 | 20 | 2 |
The relationship of SPON2 with the clinicopathological characteristics in patients with localized ccRCC.
| Characteristics | No. | SPON2 mRNA (fold-T/N) |
| SPON2 protein |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1+ | 2+ | |||||
| Age (years) | 0.998 | 0.137 | |||||
| <60 | 60 | 1.70 ± 0.29 | 27 | 31 | 2 | ||
| ≥60 | 34 | 1.70 ± 0.34 | 18 | 12 | 4 | ||
| Gender | 0.756 | 0.210 | |||||
| Male | 56 | 1.69 ± 0.31 | 25 | 29 | 2 | ||
| Female | 38 | 1.72 ± 0.30 | 20 | 14 | 4 | ||
| Tumor diameter (cm) | 0.593 | 0.735 | |||||
| ≤4 | 58 | 1.69 ± 0.31 | 27 | 28 | 3 | ||
| >4 | 36 | 1.72 ± 0.30 | 18 | 15 | 3 | ||
| TNM stage | 0.027 | 0.020 | |||||
| I | 88 | 1.69 ± 0.30 | 43 | 41 | 4 | ||
| II | 6 | 1.97 ± 0.29 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Fuhrman grade | 0.003 | 0.001 | |||||
| G1+G2 | 90 | 1.68 ± 0.30 | 45 | 41 | 4 | ||
| G3+G4 | 4 | 2.14 ± 0.20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Necrosis | 0.471 | 0.623 | |||||
| Absent | 82 | 1.71 ± 0.32 | 39 | 37 | 6 | ||
| Present | 12 | 1.64 ± 0.22 | 6 | 6 | 0 | ||
| Sarcomatoid | 0.069 | 0.057 | |||||
| Absent | 86 | 1.69 ± 0.30 | 43 | 39 | 4 | ||
| Present | 8 | 1.89 ± 0.35 | 2 | 4 | 2 | ||
| Recurrence (after surgery) | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||||
| Absent | 84 | 1.67 ± 0.49 | 44 | 37 | 3 | ||
| Present | 10 | 2.03 ± 0.51 | 1 | 6 | 3 | ||
Figure 3The correlation of SPON2 mRNA expression with the stage and grade. (a) The ccRCC patients with different stage from TCGA dataset. (b) The ccRCC patients with different stage from GSE73731. (c) The ccRCC patients with different grade from GSE73731.
Figure 4The correlation of SPON2 mRNA expression with prognosis. (a) SPON2 mRNA expression in patients with metastatic and localized ccRCC from GSE47352. (b) Kaplan-Meier overall survival analysis in patients from TCGA ccRCC dataset. (c) SPON2 mRNA expression in localized ccRCC patients with and without recurrence. (d) ROC analysis of SPON2 mRNA expression in localized ccRCC patients. (e) Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free survival analysis in localized ccRCC patients.
Uni- and multivariate analyses for predicting recurrence-free survival rate of patients with localized ccRCC.
| Characteristics | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) |
| Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) |
| |
| Age (<60 vs. ≥60) | 3.817 (0.986-14.771) | 0.052 | — | — |
| Gender (female vs. male) | 1.001 (0.282-3.549) | 0.998 | — | — |
| Tumor diameter (≤4 vs. >4) | 1.364 (0.392-4.742) | 0.625 | — | — |
| TNM stage (I vs. II) | 2.832 (1.485-9.523) | 0.179 | — | — |
| Tumor grade (1/2 vs. 3/4) | 26.651 (7.081-100.313) | <0.001 | 14.506 (2.927-71.890) | 0.001 |
| Necrosis | 0.468 (0.058-3.752) | 0.475 | — | — |
| Sarcomatoid | 10.783 (3.117-37.306) | <0.001 | 24.145 (4.312-135.215) | <0.001 |
| SPON2 protein | 4.514 (1.736-11.741) | 0.002 | 0.402 (0.076-2.126) | 0.284 |
| SPON2 mRNA | 29.104 (3.672-230.684) | 0.001 | 61.060 (2.471-1508.739) | 0.012 |
Comparison of the prognostic accuracy of the prognostic models and SPON2 expression for recurrence-free survival of patients with localized ccRCC.
| Model | Recurrence-free survival | |
|---|---|---|
| C-index | AIC | |
| Tumor grade | 0.771 | 66.285 |
| Sarcomatoid | 0.706 | 72.084 |
| SPON2 mRNA | 0.915 | 69.002 |
| Tumor grade + Sarcomatoid | 0.877 | 60.585 |
| Tumor grade + SPON2 mRNA | 0.893 | 60.176 |
| Sarcomatoid + SPON2 mRNA | 0.915 | 62.519 |
| Tumor grade + Sarcomatoid + SPON2 mRNA | 0.939 | 56.465 |
C-index: Harrell concordance index; AIC: Akaike information criteria.
Figure 5SPON2 knockdown on cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion in vitro. (a) The cell growth curves of siRNA-SPON2 group and siRNA-control group. (b) Colony formation assay. (c) Apoptotic and early apoptotic fraction. (d) Wound healing assay. (e) Matrigel invasion assay.