| Literature DB >> 30318967 |
Ying Feng1,2, Yilin Hu2, Qinsheng Mao2, Yibing Guo3, Yifei Liu4, Wanjiang Xue2,3, Shuqun Cheng5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the extracellular matrix protein Spondin-2 (SPON2) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissues and to determine its potential value as a prognostic indicator by assessing its correlation with clinicopathological variables and survival.Entities:
Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Spondin-2; immunohistochemistry; prognosis; tissue microarrays; tumor thrombus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30318967 PMCID: PMC6381490 DOI: 10.1177/0300060518803232
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Figure 1.Mining of the Oncomine database indicates that SPON2 mRNA expression is upregulated in HCC tissues. (a–c) SPON2 mRNA expression in normal liver and HCC tissues, based on the Roessler Liver dataset (a), Roessler Liver 2 dataset (b), and Wurmbach Liver dataset (c). (d) SPON2 mRNA expression in normal liver, cirrhotic liver, and HCC tissues, based on the Mas Liver dataset.
Figure 2.Expression of SPON2 in HCC and normal liver tissue. (a) qRT-PCR analysis of SPON2 mRNA expression in 20 paired HCC and matched non-cancerous liver tissues. (b) TMA-IHC analysis of SPON2 protein expression in 107 paired HCC and matched non-cancerous liver tissues.
Association between SPON2 mRNA expression and clinicopathological parameters in HCC patients based on Oncomine datasets.
| Dataset[ | Clinicopathological parameters | n | χ2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Below-median | Above-median | |||||
| Wurmbach Liver | ||||||
| Size (cm) | ||||||
| ≤5 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 4.309 | 0.038 | |
| >5 | 10 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Chiang Liver | ||||||
| Age (years) | ||||||
| ≤50 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5.199 | 0.023 | |
| >50 | 76 | 40 | 36 | |||
| Jia Liver | ||||||
| Age (years) | ||||||
| ≤50 | 121 | 51 | 70 | 5.069 | 0.014 | |
| >50 | 117 | 68 | 49 | |||
The analysis was performed by using datasets from the Oncomine cancer gene expression microarray database (https://www.oncomine.org/resource/login.html).
Association between SPON2 protein expression and clinicopathological parameters in HCC patients based on TMA-IHC analysis.
| Clinicopathological parameters | n | Low expression | High expression | χ2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 75 | 35 | 40 | 0.100 | 0.752 |
| Female | 32 | 16 | 16 | ||
| Age (years) | |||||
| ≤50 | 45 | 22 | 23 | 0.047 | 0.829 |
| >50 | 62 | 29 | 33 | ||
| Grade of differentiation | |||||
| Low | 39 | 26 | 13 | 12.914 | 0.002 |
| Middle | 35 | 17 | 18 | ||
| High | 33 | 8 | 25 | ||
| Tumor diameter (cm) | |||||
| ≤5 | 49 | 29 | 20 | 4.809 | 0.028 |
| >5 | 58 | 22 | 36 | ||
| Child-Pugh stage | |||||
| A | 38 | 26 | 12 | 10.178 | 0.001 |
| B or C | 69 | 25 | 44 | ||
| Hepatocirrhosis | |||||
| Absent | 24 | 11 | 13 | 0.042 | 0.838 |
| Present | 83 | 40 | 43 | ||
| HBV infection | |||||
| Absent | 41 | 21 | 20 | 0.337 | 0.562 |
| Present | 66 | 30 | 36 | ||
| Tumor thrombus | |||||
| Absent | 47 | 25 | 22 | 1.027 | 0.311 |
| Present | 60 | 26 | 34 | ||
| AFP (ng/mL) | |||||
| ≤20 | 52 | 27 | 25 | 0.736 | 0.391 |
| >20 | 55 | 24 | 31 | ||
| BCLC stage | |||||
| A | 24 | 14 | 10 | 1.412 | 0.235 |
| B, C, or D | 83 | 37 | 46 | ||
| Envelope | |||||
| Absent | 63 | 26 | 37 | 2.511 | 0.113 |
| Present | 44 | 25 | 19 | ||
| Tumor satellite | |||||
| Absent | 58 | 26 | 32 | 0.408 | 0.523 |
| Present | 49 | 25 | 24 |
*P<0.05; Serum Alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP); Hepatitis B Virus (HBV); Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC).
Figure 3.Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of SPON2 expression in HCC patients. Correlation between prognosis of HCC patients and tumor expression of (a) SPON2 mRNA, based on the Oncomine Hoshida Liver Statistics dataset, and (b) SPON2 protein, based on the TMA-IHC dataset.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival and disease-free survival in HCC patients.
| Characteristics | Overall Survival | Disease-Free Survival | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||||
| Sex | ||||||||
| Male vs. female | 1.037 (0.499–2.151) | 0.932 | 0.890 (0.428–1.847) | 0.754 | ||||
| Age (year) | ||||||||
| ≤50 vs. >50 | 0.811 (0.367–1.791) | 0.604 | 0.592 (0.275–1.275) | 0.180 | ||||
| Grade of differentiation | ||||||||
| Low/Middle/High | 0.764 (0.372–1.573) | 0.466 | 0.581 (0.290–1.166) | 0.127 | ||||
| Tumor diameter (cm) | ||||||||
| ≤5 vs. >5 | 1.639 (0.460–5.836) | 0.446 | 2.967 (0.742–11.856) | 0.124 | ||||
| Child-Pugh stage | ||||||||
| A vs. B or C | 0.874 (0.170–4.503) | 0.872 | 1.180 (0.370–3.766) | 0.780 | ||||
| Hepatocirrhosis | ||||||||
| − vs. + | 1.896 (0.789–4.556) | 0.153 | 2.264 (0.950–5.397) | 0.065 | ||||
| HBV infection | ||||||||
| − vs. + | 1.541 (0.778–3.052) | 0.215 | 1.359 (0.700–2.638) | 0.365 | ||||
| Tumor thrombus | ||||||||
| − vs. + | 2.400 (1.219–4.726) | 0.011* | 2.372 (1.264–4.452) | 0.007* | 2.123 (1.086–4.153) | 0.028* | 2.079 (1.113–3.884) | 0.022* |
| AFP (ng/mL) | ||||||||
| ≤20 vs. >20 | 1.369 (0.717–2.613) | 0.341 | 1.735 (0.905–3.324) | 0.097 | ||||
| BCLC stage | ||||||||
| A vs. B, C, or D | 0.367 (0.154–0.879) | 0.024* | 1.053 (0.515–0.252) | 0.069 | 0.398 (0.167–0.951) | 0.038* | 0.681 (0.340–1.363) | 0.278 |
| Envelope | ||||||||
| − vs. + | 0.637 (0.189–2.150) | 0.467 | 0.394 (0.103–1.506) | 0.173 | ||||
| Tumor satellite | ||||||||
| − vs. + | 1.829 (0.924–3.622) | 0.083 | 1.797 (0.920–3.510) | 0.086 | ||||
| SPON2 expression | ||||||||
| Low vs. High | 4.519 (2.142–9.533) | <0.001* | 3.093 (1.659–5.766) | <0.001* | 4.330 (2.056–9.121) | <0.001* | 3.175 (1.692–5.960) | <0.001* |
*P<0.05; Serum Alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP); Hepatitis B Virus (HBV); Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC); Hazard Ratio (HR); Confidence Interval (CI).