Literature DB >> 32949434

Seroprevalence and risk factors for bovine brucellosis in the Chittagong Metropolitan Area of Bangladesh.

Shariful Islam1,2,3, Shama Ranjan Barua1,4, Shahnaj Parvin Moni1, Ariful Islam3,5, A K M Anisur Rahman6, Sharmin Chowdhury1.   

Abstract

Brucellosis is a neglected endemic zoonosis in Bangladesh and has a significant impact on public health and animal welfare of dairy farming as well as dairy farm economics. A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the seroprevalence of and risk factors for brucellosis in dairy cattle in the Chittagong metropolitan area (CMA) of Chittagong, Bangladesh. We collected serum samples (n = 158) from six randomly selected dairy farms in the CMA between February and November, 2015. The Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) and a competitive ELISA (cELISA) were used as the screening and confirmatory tests respectively. Farm level and animal level demographic and risk factor data were collected using a questionnaire. The risk factors were analysed using a multivariable logistic regression with random effects. The overall seroprevalences of antibodies against brucellosis in cattle were 21.5% (34/158) and 7.6% (12/158) based on parallel and serial interpretation of the two tests respectively. Our results revealed that 20.3% (32/158) samples were positive using the RBPT and 8.9% (14/158) were positive using the cELISA. The within-herd seroprevalence ranged from 10% to 26.3% and 5 to 20.7% using the RBPT and cELISA tests respectively. The odds of seropositivity were significantly higher in lactating cows (OR: 2.59; 95% CI: 1.02-6.55), cows producing less than 2 litres of milk (OR: 29.6; 95% CI: 4.3-353.8), cow producing 2-12 litres of milk (OR: 4.8; 95% CI: 1.1-33.4) and cows with reproductive disorders (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.2-10.1). About 7.6% (12/158) and 1.3% (2/158) of cattle were found to be infected with acute and chronic brucellosis respectively. Based on these results, we suggest that cows that have reproductive disorders and are producing little milk should be prioritized for brucellosis screening in CMA. The screening tests should be used to control brucellosis in cattle in order to protect animal welfare, human health and to minimize the economic losses.
© 2020 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RBPT; brucellosis; cELISA; lactating cows; seroprevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32949434      PMCID: PMC7840193          DOI: 10.1002/vms3.348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Med Sci        ISSN: 2053-1095


  31 in total

1.  Prevalence of brucellosis and its association with reproductive problems in cows in Bangladesh.

Authors:  M S Rahman; J-C Han; J Park; J-H Lee; S-K Eo; J-S Chae
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2006-08-05       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 2.  Advancement of knowledge of Brucella over the past 50 years.

Authors:  S C Olsen; M V Palmer
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.221

3.  Seroprevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in cattle in selected districts of Jimma zone, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Bashahun Gebremichael Dirar; George William Nasinyama; Benti Deresa Gelalcha
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Isolation of Brucella abortus from a Dog and a Cat Confirms their Biological Role in Re-emergence and Dissemination of Bovine Brucellosis on Dairy Farms.

Authors:  G Wareth; F Melzer; M El-Diasty; G Schmoock; E Elbauomy; N Abdel-Hamid; A Sayour; H Neubauer
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.005

5.  Brucellosis and associated risk factors in dairy cattle of eastern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Yitagele Terefe; Sisay Girma; Negesse Mekonnen; Biruhtesfa Asrade
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 6.  Diagnosis of brucellosis in livestock and wildlife.

Authors:  Jacques Godfroid; Klaus Nielsen; Claude Saegerman
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.351

7.  Immune Response of Calves Vaccinated with Brucella abortus S19 or RB51 and Revaccinated with RB51.

Authors:  Elaine M S Dorneles; Graciela K Lima; Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho; Márcio S S Araújo; Olindo A Martins-Filho; Nammalwar Sriranganathan; Hamzeh Al Qublan; Marcos B Heinemann; Andrey P Lage
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Erythritol Availability in Bovine, Murine and Human Models Highlights a Potential Role for the Host Aldose Reductase during Brucella Infection.

Authors:  Thibault Barbier; Arnaud Machelart; Amaia Zúñiga-Ripa; Hubert Plovier; Charlotte Hougardy; Elodie Lobet; Kevin Willemart; Eric Muraille; Xavier De Bolle; Emile Van Schaftingen; Ignacio Moriyón; Jean-Jacques Letesson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Bayesian evaluation of three serological tests for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in Bangladesh.

Authors:  A K M A Rahman; S Smit; B Devleesschauwer; P Kostoulas; E Abatih; C Saegerman; M Shamsuddin; D Berkvens; N K Dhand; M P Ward
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.451

10.  Access to Interdental Brushing in Periodontal Healthy Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Florence Carrouel; Juan Carlos Llodra; Stéphane Viennot; Julie Santamaria; Manuel Bravo; Denis Bourgeois
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Seroprevalence and risk factors for bovine brucellosis in the Chittagong Metropolitan Area of Bangladesh.

Authors:  Shariful Islam; Shama Ranjan Barua; Shahnaj Parvin Moni; Ariful Islam; A K M Anisur Rahman; Sharmin Chowdhury
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-19

2.  Seroprevalence and risk factors of bluetongue virus in sheep of Chattogram, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Tahura Khanam Munmun; Shariful Islam; Shafayat Zamil; Md Ashiqur Rahman; Josefina Abedin; Abdul Ahad; Ariful Islam
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-06-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.