Literature DB >> 32948557

Association of age-related macular degeneration on fracture risks among osteoporosis population: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Chi Chin Sun1,2,3, Ting-Shuo Huang4, Tsai-Sheng Fu5, Chia-Yi Lee6, Bing-Yu Chen3, Fang-Ping Chen7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Visual impairment is an important risk factor for fracture in the elderly population. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible visual impairment in elderly people. This study was conducted to explore the relationship between AMD and incident fractures in patients with osteoporosis (OS).
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD).
SETTING: A multicenter study conducted in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: The current study used the NHIRD in Taiwan between 1996 and 2011. A total of 13 584 and 54 336 patients with OS were enrolled in the AMD group and the non-AMD group, respectively. INTERVENTION: Patients with OS were included from the Taiwan's NHIRD after exclusion, and each patient with AMD was matched for age, sex and comorbidities to four patients with non-AMD OS, who served as the control group. A Cox proportional hazard model was used for the multivariable analysis. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Transitions for OS to spine fracture, OS to hip fracture, OS to humero-radio-ulnar fracture and OS to death.
RESULTS: The risks of spine and hip fractures were significantly higher in the AMD group (HR=1.09, 95% CI=1.04 to 1.15, p<0.001; HR=1.18; 95% CI=1.08 to 1.30, p=0.001, respectively) than in the non-AMD group. The incidence of humero-radio-ulnar fracture between AMD and non-AMD individuals was similar (HR=0.98; 95% CI=0.90 to 1.06; p=0.599). However, the risk of death was higher in patients with OS with older age, male sex and all types of comorbidity (p<0.05), except for hyperthyroidism (p=0.200).
CONCLUSION: Patients with OS with AMD had a greater risk of spine and hip fractures than did patients without AMD. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone diseases; epidemiology; hip; medical retina; ophthalmology; trauma management

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32948557      PMCID: PMC7500305          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


The current study enrolled a large number of participants 13 548 (age-related macular degeneration (AMD) group) patients and 54 336 (a non-AMD group) patients. Each participant can be followed up to 16 years even when visited to different hospitals. The causal relationship between AMD and subsequent bone fracture in patients with osteoporosis (OS) has not yet been established in the current study. The disease severity of OS is inaccessible in the Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database because of simply using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes. The severity of ocular disease leading to fractures or higher mortality rate has not yet been determined.

Introduction

Poor vision is common in the elderly population. Ocular diseases such as cataract, glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are strongly age-related,1–4 and there is accumulating evidence demonstrating that many elderly people would benefit from changing eyeglasses.2 5 AMD is one of the leading causes of irreversible visual impairment in elderly people in developed countries.6–8 The estimated incidence of AMD in Taiwan is approximately 10.8%.9 Although, it does not result in complete blindness; however, the loss of central vision can make it difficult to perform daily activities such as recognising faces, driving and reading.10 According to a previous report, patients with AMD are in greater fear of falling down, which can restrict their social activities.11 Moreover, individuals with AMD have a higher probability to fall with more unsteady gait patterns.12 13 Osteoporosis (OS) is a chronic metabolic bone disease in which bones become relatively weak and have a probability to break.14 The prevalence of OS is estimated to be 11.35% among women over 50 years old.15 It has been observed that patients with OS tend to develop fractures of the hip, vertebrae, distal forearm and humerus,16 and fractures among elderly patients represent an important public health issue.17 Taiwan’s population is ageing at an alarming rate15; OS and related fractures pose an unprecedented threat to the elderly population in Taiwan since the prevalence of OS increases rapidly with age.14 As fractures in the elderly would contribute to a higher probability of mortality despite promptly surgical intervention,18 19 potential risk factors for individuals vulnerable to fractures, such as those with OS, should be further investigated and identified. Visual impairment is an important risk factor for hip fracture in the elderly population.20–22 Studies have revealed that macular degeneration and glaucoma suspect would lead to a higher risk of hip fractures.22 Therefore, it is important to understand the ocular risk factors and take measures to prevent future fractures in patients with OS. However, only a limited number of studies have examined the association between fractures in patients with OS and specific ocular disorders.22–24 Taking AMD as an example, studies focused only on patients with AMD and hip fractures, ignoring spine and humero-radio-ulnar fractures.22–24 Moreover, the number of participants in previous studies was relatively small,22–24 while a population-based study should be conducted to investigate the relationship between AMD and fractures in patients with OS since both disorders affect most population.1 14 Therefore, we used the Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) in this nationwide study with a retrospective cohort and a case–control design to investigate the association between AMD and subsequent fractures in patients with OS.

Methods

Ethics declaration and patient involvement statement

Participants in this study were adhered to the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Patient and public involvement statement

As this is a claimed data-based study, data were collected and produced by the National Health Insurance (NHI) Administration of Taiwan without patient recruitment; the requirement for informed consent was waived by both the NHI Administration and the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.

Data source

This population-based cohort study used the NHIRD of Taiwan (approximately 26 million insured individuals) for the period January 1996 to December 2011. By the end of 2007, NHIRD had enrolled more than 99% of Taiwan’s population into this insurance programme, which had contracts with 97% of the country’s clinics and hospitals. The data available through the NHIRD included all medical services provided to each enrollee from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 2011, as well as the patients’ characteristics and the features of the hospitals and physicians.

Study population enrolment and exclusion criteria

We identified patients with diagnosis of OS using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9) codes 733.00, 733.01, 733.02, 733.03 and 733.09. The osteoporotic population of the NHIRD was identified by the presence of either the abovementioned diagnostic codes in their outpatient records or the discharge codes from hospitalisation records. Eligible patients were those 50 years of age or older with diagnosis of OS. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) received osteoporotic medical treatments for more than 30 days before the index date; (2) any fractures documented before the index date (ICD-9 codes 800.x–829.x); (3) having a diagnosis of HIV (ICD-9 codes 042) and (4) being diagnosed with metastatic solid tumours (ICD-9 codes 196.x–198.x). Furthermore, we divided patients into those with AMD (AMD group with primary diagnosis codes of ICD-9 362.50–362.52) and those without AMD (non-AMD group). After propensity score matching, 13 548 patients and 54 336 patients were analysed in the AMD and non-AMD group, respectively.

Outcome definition

We identified hospitalised patients who were admitted with a primary diagnosis of hip fracture (ICD-9 codes 820.x), spine fracture (ICD-9 codes 806.x) and humero-radio-ulnar fractures (ICD-9 codes 812.x and 813.x) for the first time after 2002 (ensuring no previous hip, spine and humero-radio-ulnar fractures between 1996 and 2001) and who received surgery for fractures to make sure the diagnostic accuracy (surgery code of NHIRD: 64245C, 64042C, 64160B, 64271B, 64271C, 64032B). The date of death was defined as the expired date recorded in the catastrophic illness registry data files, the discharge date from a patient’s insurance coverage within 1 month after being critical against medical advice discharge or the discharge date from a patient’s insurance coverage within 1 month after emergency department discharge with intravenous epinephrine use. We defined it as such because the NHI is mandatory in Taiwan; therefore, patients, especially sick ones, can rarely stop their own insurance coverage. If the insurance coverage ended, death was the reason. Furthermore, NHI premiums are paid monthly, so coverage can be stopped immediately following a death. The time-to-event outcome was determined as the time from the OS diagnosis date to the date of hip fracture, spine fracture and humero-radio-ulnar fractures, or all-cause death, respectively.

Covariates

The comorbidities were defined as an outpatient diagnosis listed on two or more visits or a one-time inpatient diagnosis before the index date. Study comorbidities included diabetes mellitus (DM), moderate to severe liver disease, chronic renal disease, hyperthyroidism, rheumatic disease, malignancy, hyperparathyroidism and ocular diseases including cataract, corneal diseases and glaucoma. The Charlson Comorbidity Index score (CCIs) that merges the abovementioned diseases into one numerical score was also recorded.

Statistical analysis

To compare the AMD and each transition, we performed propensity score matching. The propensity score was the predicted probability of being the AMD group given the values of covariates including age, sex, rheumatologic diseases, DM with and without complications, malignancy, moderate to severe liver diseases, hyperthyroidism, chronic renal diseases, cataract, corneal disease, glaucoma, hyperparathyroidism and CCIs. Each patient in the AMD group was matched with four counterparts in the non-AMD group to achieve minimal bias. The cumulative incidence of follow-up outcomes was generated and the comparisons between the two groups for the risk of spine, hip and humero-radio-ulnar fractures were made using the Cox proportional hazards model in which death was considered a competing risk. We checked the proportional hazards assumption using modified Schoenfeld residuals test and residual plots in each Cox model. For the violation of proportional hazards assumption, we demonstrated the interaction between the variable and time using step functions or functions guided from residual plots. To investigate the cumulative incidence of each fracture and cause of death, we engaged in the competing risk model with the HR adjusted all the above mentioned covariates to analyse the transitions, including ‘OS to spine fracture’, ‘OS to hip fracture’, ‘OS to humero-radio-ulnar fracture’ between AMD and non-AMD subjects, and the transition of ‘OS to death’ for the abovementioned covariates. Finally, to facilitate the interpretation of time-varying coefficients, we conducted postestimation simulation techniques and graphs with visual weight to demonstrate the results. All reported CIs and tests were two-sided with a 5% significance level. All analyses were performed with R V.3.3.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) with contributed packages ‘tableone’, ‘ReporteRs’, ‘mstate’, ‘survival’, ‘ggplot2’ and ‘simPH’.

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 1 850 205 patients with OS were enrolled in this nationwide study. After applying the exclusion criteria, a total of 1 206 247 patients participated, of which 15 128 were in the AMD group and 18 191 119 were in the non-AMD group. After propensity score matching, 13 548 patients and 54 336 patients were analysed in the AMD and non-AMD group, respectively (figure 1). The selected characteristics—including age, sex, related covariates and CCIs—were well balanced between the AMD and non-AMD groups after propensity score matching (table 1).
Figure 1

Flowchart of the patient selection in AMD and non-AMD cohort with a one-to-four match. AMD, age-related macular degeneration.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics between the AMD and non-AMD groups

AMD (n=13 584)Non-AMD (n=54 336)P value
Age, median (IQR)73.8 (67.2–79.3)73.8 (67.2–79.3)1
Age group, No (%)
 ≥50 to <601277 (9.4)5075 (9.3)0.98
 ≥60 to <703372 (24.8)13 424 (24.7)
 ≥70 to <805881 (43.3)23 603 (43.4)
 803054 (22.5)12 234 (22.5)
Sex, No (%)
 Female8081 (59.5)32 324 (59.5)1
Rheumatologic diseases, No (%)846 (6.2)3384 (6.2)1
DM without complications, No (%)4101 (30.2)16 404 (30.2)1
DM with complications, No (%)1629 (12.0)6516 (12.0)1
Malignancy, No (%)1470 (10.8)5880 (10.8)1
Moderate to severe liver diseases, No (%)19 (0.1)76 (0.1)1
Hyperthyroidism, No (%)204 (1.5)816 (1.5)1
Chronic renal diseases, No (%)598 (4.4)2392 (4.4)1
Cataract, No (%)10 276 (75.6)41 104 (75.6)1
Corneal disease, No (%)2665 (19.6)10 660 (19.6)1
Glaucoma, No (%)2037 (15.0)8148 (15.0)1
CCIs, median (IQR)5.00 (3.00–7.00)5.00 (3.00–7.00)0.22

AMD, age-related macular degeneration; CCIs, Charlson Comorbidity Index score; DM, diabetes mellitus; No, number of patients.

Baseline characteristics between the AMD and non-AMD groups AMD, age-related macular degeneration; CCIs, Charlson Comorbidity Index score; DM, diabetes mellitus; No, number of patients. Flowchart of the patient selection in AMD and non-AMD cohort with a one-to-four match. AMD, age-related macular degeneration.

Estimates of cumulative hazards and probabilities of transition

During the follow-up period in the study population, 8930 (13.1%) patients with OS had spine fractures, 2461 (3.6%) hip fractures, humero-radio-ulnar fractures occurred in 3470 (5.1%) patients with OS and 8123 (13.0%) patients with OS unfortunately died. During the follow-up period, the entire study population had higher risks for spine fracture and death compared with humero-radio-ulnar fracture and hip fracture (figure 2).
Figure 2

Estimates of cumulative hazards of transition among patients with OS. OS, osteoporosis.

Estimates of cumulative hazards of transition among patients with OS. OS, osteoporosis.

The effect of AMD on transition of fractures

In the multivariate analysis, a patient with OS with AMD was significantly associated with a high risk of spine fracture after adjusting for covariates (HR=1.09; 95% CI=1.04 to 1.15; p<0.001) compared with a non-AMD individual. Similarly, AMD was significantly associated with a high risk of hip fracture (HR=1.18; 95% CI=1.08 to 1.30; p<0.001) than a patient without AMD. However, AMD was not associated with risks for the humero-radio-ulnar fracture (HR=0.98; 95% CI=0.90 to 1.06; p=0.599). Additionally, multivariate analysis also revealed that older age, male sex and all non-ocular medical comorbidities, except for hyperthyroidism (p=0.200), were significantly associated with higher risks for death (p<0.05) (table 2). The fact that with increasing age and being female are vulnerable to any type of incident fractures is also shown in our results (table 2). It is also noteworthy that other ocular comorbidities, including cataract and corneal diseases, are associated with a high risk of spine fractures (HR=1.23; 95% CI=1.17 to 1.31; p<0.001 and HR=1.18; 95% CI=1.12 to 1.23; p<0.001) and humero-radio-ulnar fractures (HR=1.16; 95% CI=1.06 to 1.26; p<0.001 and HR=1.08; 95% CI=1.00 to 1.17; p=0.041). However, a patient with OS with glaucoma is not associated with a high risk of any incident fractures, which is due to the relatively fewer cases and the heterogeneous disease stages in this study cohort.
Table 2

The effect of AMD on transition of fractures and death

Osteoporosis to deathOsteoporosis to spine fractureOsteoporosis to hip fractureOsteoporosis to humero-radio-ulnar fracture
HR (95% CI)P valueHR (95% CI)P valueHR (95% CI)P valueHR (95% CI)P value
AMD
 NoN/AReferenceReferenceReference
 YesN/AN/A1.09 (1.04 to 1.15)<0.0011.18 (1.08 to 1.30)0.0010.98 (0.90 to 1.06)0.599
Age
 50–59ReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
 60–691.46 (1.28 to 1.66)<0.0012.37 (2.11 to 2.66)<0.0013.03 (2.21 to 4.16)<0.0011.08 (0.96 to 1.22)0.203
 70–792.67 (2.36 to 3.02)<0.0013.71 (3.31 to 4.15)<0.0017.92 (5.85 to 10.73)<0.0011.25 (1.12 to 1.41)<0.001
 >804.72 (4.16 to 5.36)<0.0014.70 (4.19 to 5.29)<0.00116.33 (12.04 to 22.16)<0.0011.20 (1.05 to 1.37)0.007
Sex
 FemaleReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
 Male1.30 (1.24 to 1.36)<0.0010.58 (0.55 to 0.61)<0.0010.66 (0.61 to 0.72)<0.0010.42 (0.39 to 0.46)<0.001
Rheumatologic diseases
 NoReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
 Yes1.11 (1.03 to 1.20)0.0051.20 (1.12 to 1.29)<0.0011.10 (0.96 to 1.26)0.1561.11 (1.00 to 1.24)0.059
DM without complications
 NoReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
 Yes1.27 (1.21 to 1.34)<0.0011.00 (0.95 to 1.05)0.9571.04 (0.94 to 1.15)0.3991.12 (1.04 to 1.22)0.005
DM with complications
 NoReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
 Yes1.41 (1.33 to 1.50)<0.0010.99 (0.92 to 1.06)0.7171.50 (1.33 to 1.69)<0.0011.05 (0.94 to 1.17)0.37
Malignancy
 NoReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
 Yes4.41 (4.19 to 4.63)<0.0011.09 (1.03 to 1.16)0.0041.02 (0.92 to 1.15)0.6661.03 (0.93 to 1.14)0.581
Moderate to severe liver diseases
 NoReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
 Yes4.69 (4.24 to 5.18)<0.0011.29 (0.99 to 1.69)0.061.06 (0.63 to 1.80)0.8170.69 (0.40 to 1.19)0.178
Hyperthyroidism
 NoReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
 Yes0.90 (0.76 to 1.06)0.21.07 (0.93 to 1.23)0.3381.19 (0.91 to 1.56)0.2031.15 (0.95 to 1.39)0.151
Chronic renal diseases
 NoReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
 Yes2.22 (2.10 to 2.35)<0.0011.01 (0.93 to 1.10)0.7861.57 (1.38 to 1.77)<0.0010.99 (0.86 to 1.14)0.876
Cataract
 NoN/AReferenceReferenceReference
 YesN/AN/A1.23 (1.17 to 1.31)<0.0011.05 (0.94 to 1.16)0.391.16 (1.06 to 1.26)<0.001
Corneal diseases
 NoN/AReferenceReferenceReference
 YesN/AN/A1.18 (1.12 to 1.23)<0.0011.05 (0.96 to 1.15)0.3221.08 (1.00 to 1.17)0.041
Glaucoma
 NoN/AReferenceReferenceReference
 YesN/AN/A1.00 (0.95 to 1.06)0.8711.02 (0.92 to 1.12)0.7731.04 (0.96 to 1.13)0.355
Hyperparathyroidism
 NoReferenceN/AN/AN/A
 Yes1.89 (1.42 to 2.52)<0.001N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
CCIs
 Every point increase1.08 (1.07 to 1.08)<0.001N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

AMD, age-related macular degeneration; CCIs, Charlson Comorbidity Index score; DM, diabetes mellitus; N/A, the analysis did not perform since it is not necessary for the purpose of the current study.

The effect of AMD on transition of fractures and death AMD, age-related macular degeneration; CCIs, Charlson Comorbidity Index score; DM, diabetes mellitus; N/A, the analysis did not perform since it is not necessary for the purpose of the current study.

Discussion

In this study, our results showed that AMD incurred a 1.09-fold and 1.18-fold risk of subsequent spine hip fractures, respectively, in patients with OS older than 50 years after adjusting for demography, ocular and systemic comorbidities. However, AMD did not increase the risk of humero-radio-ulnar fracture in this multivariate model. About a third of the elderly population living in the community suffered from one or more falls each year,25 which can damage one that has OS easily and lead to severe injury, physical deterioration, institutionalisation and incident deaths.26 Most falls resulted from the interactions of multiple risk factors, including age, muscle weakness, poor vision, difficulties with gait and balance, previous falls, fear of falling and chronic illnesses such as arthritis, DM, stroke, Parkinson’s disease, incontinence and dementia.25 27 28 It is well recognised that fall-related ocular risk factors are also major contributors to fractures in the elderly,22 which was supported by the findings of the current study. Many older people living in the community were affected by poor vision or eye disease such as cataract, glaucoma and macular degeneration.1 29 Studies have also demonstrated that AMD is associated with an increased risk of hip fractures by analysing the medicare database.23 24 30 Anastasopoulos et al30 found that the risk of hip fractures was significantly higher in cases that were coded with atrophic (dry) AMD.30 However, the risk was similar in cases that were coded with exudative AMD and cases with no AMD. This study revealed that patients with a code for both types of AMD had significantly greater risk of hip fractures than patients without a code for AMD in osteoporotic population. The higher risk in this study reflected the fact that patients with OS are a potentially vulnerable population to developing fractures secondary to an accidental fall. Fractures caused by OS most frequently occur in the spine.14 These spinal fractures occur in nearly 700 000 patients each year in the USA and is twice as common as other OS-related fractures such as hip and wrist fractures.31 Generally, spinal compression fractures result from falls,32 but patients with OS can suffer fractures even when doing routine works, such as twisting, coughing and sneezing.33 However, there are very few reports on the association between AMD and spine fractures in patients with OS. In this study, patients with AMD have a significantly greater risk of spine fractures. Therefore, it is important to screen ocular comorbidity such as AMD in elderly patients with OS to prevent both hip and spine fractures. This study demonstrated that AMD was not associated with a greater risk of humero-radio-ulnar fractures. Primarily because humerus fractures occur in a relatively young population after physical trauma, falls, excess physical stress such as baseball games34 and even with the presence of AMD, it did not cause significant visual impairment at a relatively younger age. However, proximal humerus fractures occur among elderly patients with OS who fall on an outstretched arm,35 which corresponded to our finding in which 70 years or older were associated with an increased risk of humero-radio-ulnar fractures (table 2). The risk of death was significantly higher in patients with OS with older age, male sex and the majority of systemic diseases in the current study. It is reasonable since the factors are related to a relatively unhealthy status; however, the non-significant relationship between hyperparathyroidism and death in OS individuals needs further validation. Although the chance of death is increased in patients with OS with systemic comorbidities, attention should be paid to the fact that these patients with additional AMD diagnosis have a higher risk of spine and hip fractures and subsequent death caused by fractures.18 19 Therefore, we should aggressively treat AMD to prevent fractures in patients with OS if they are not affected by severe systemic diseases. A major limitation of this study is that the disease severity is inaccessible in the NHIRD and the effects of different severities of ocular comorbidities on different fractures cannot be obtained. However, it seemed unlikely that selection bias was a factor given that the basis of subject selection was not associated with the magnitude of fractures and the severity of ocular comorbidities. A minor limitation lies in the absence of outcome measures after treatment for both AMD and OS, which cannot provide therapeutic guidelines. In conclusion, patients with OS with AMD are at a significantly higher risk of subsequent development of spine and hip fractures, but not humero-radio-ulnar fractures than matched controls. Moreover, older age, male sex and major systemic comorbidities in patients with OS are related to death. Further investigations are needed to clarify if the treatment of AMD, such as vitrectomy and intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injection, would prevent primary fractures in patients with OS.
  35 in total

1.  Trends in epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Christian Bahrs; Tanja Stojicevic; Stojicevic Tanja; Gunnar Blumenstock; Blumenstock Gunnar; Stig Brorson; Brorson Stig; Andreas Badke; Ulrich Stöckle; Stöckle Ulrich; Bernd Rolauffs; Rolauffs Bernd; Thomas Freude; Freude Thomas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Kristine E Ensrud; John T Schousboe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  An overview and management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Tümay Sözen; Lale Özışık; Nursel Çalık Başaran
Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol       Date:  2016-12-30

4.  Age related macular degeneration and visual disability.

Authors:  John B Christoforidis; Nicola Tecce; Roberto Dell'Omo; Rodolfo Mastropasqua; Marco Verolino; Ciro Costagliola
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.465

Review 5.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Estimated prevalence of osteoporosis from a Nationwide Health Insurance database in Taiwan.

Authors:  Nan-Ping Yang; Chung-Yeh Deng; Yiing-Jenq Chou; Po-Quang Chen; Ching-Heng Lin; Pesus Chou; Hong-Jen Chang
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study.

Authors:  Wen-Ming Hsu; Ching-Yu Cheng; Jorn-Hon Liu; Su-Ying Tsai; Pesus Chou
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Visual acuity and the causes of visual loss in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Authors:  K Attebo; P Mitchell; W Smith
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; M C Nevitt; W S Browner; K Stone; K M Fox; K E Ensrud; J Cauley; D Black; T M Vogt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-03-23       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Fear of falling in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Suzanne W van Landingham; Robert W Massof; Emilie Chan; David S Friedman; Pradeep Y Ramulu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.209

View more
  2 in total

1.  Disease burden of age-related macular degeneration in China from 1990 to 2019: findings from the global burden of disease study.

Authors:  Yichi Zhang; Aiming Chen; Minjie Zou; Zhenlan Yang; Danying Zheng; Min Fan; Guangming Jin
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 4.413

2.  The Association of Erythropoietin and Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Hemodialysis Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Evelyn-Jou-Chen Huang; Fung-Chang Sung; Peir-Haur Hung; Chih-Hsin Muo; Meei-Maan Wu; Chih-Ching Yeh
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 6.208

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.