| Literature DB >> 32948196 |
Falko Frenzel1, Laura König-Mattern2, Valerie Stock1, Linn Voss1, Maxi B Paul1, Holger Sieg1, Albert Braeuning1, Andreas Voigt2, Linda Böhmert3.
Abstract
Nanoparticles exhibit a specific diffusion and sedimentation behavior under cell culture conditions as used in nantoxicological in vitro testing. How a particular particle suspension behaves depends on the particular physicochemical characteristics of the particles and the cell culture system. Only a fraction of the nanoparticles applied to a cell culture will thus reach the cells within a given time frame. Therefore, dosimetric calculations are essential not only to determine the exact fraction of nanoparticles that has come into contact with the cells, but also to ensure experimental comparability and correct interpretation of results, respectively. Yet, the use of published dosimetry models is limited. Not the least because the correct application of these in silico tools usually requires bioinformatics knowledge, which often is perceived a hurdle. Moreover, not all models are freely available and accessible. In order to overcome this obstacle, we have now developed an easy-to-use interface for our recently published 3DSDD dosimetry model, called NanoPASS (NanoParticle Administration Sedimentation Simulator). The interface is freely available to all researchers. It will facilitate the use of in silico dosimetry in nanotoxicology and thus improve interpretation and comparability of in vitro results in the field.Entities:
Keywords: Caco-2; Cell culture; Dosimetric calculation; HepaRG; In vitro; Nanotoxicology
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32948196 PMCID: PMC7502021 DOI: 10.1186/s12989-020-00368-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol ISSN: 1743-8977 Impact factor: 9.400
Fig. 1Visual appearance of the dosimetry user interface NanoPASS for calculations with the 3DSDD model. Representative images show the entry mask (a) and the results delivered by the software (b)
Parameters needed for dosimetric calculations with the 3DSDD model
| parameter | unit | commonly used methods | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
hydrodynamic diameter diffusion coefficient | [nm] [nm2 s− 1] | NTA, DLS NTA | One of the two parameters is needed, either as average or as whole distribution. |
| effective density | [g cm− 3] | volumetric centrifugation method | The effective density of particles is the density of particle agglomerates that are formed for most particles in cell culture medium. For more detail please refer to [ |
| dish bottom area | [cm2] | length measured or manufacturer’s information | |
| medium filling level | [cm] | height measured or calculated | |
| height of cell growth at the walls | [cm] | height measured | Differentiated cell models like Caco-2 or HepaRG cells push their monolayer up the lateral wall of the culture dish during differentiation (see [ |
| medium density | [g cm−3] | densitometer | |
| medium viscosity | [mPa s] | viscometer | |
| temperature during incubation | [°C] | thermometer | |
| temperature during particle characterization | [°C] | thermometer | |
| medium viscosity during particles characterization | [mPa s] | NTA | |
| number of particles simulated | – | – | Selecting more particles yields more detailed results, but increases the computational power needed (recommendation: 10,000 particles). |
| simulation time | [h] | – | Corresponds to the maximal incubation time of interest. |
| fraction of an hour a data snapshot is taken | [h] | – | These snapshots are needed for the interactive 3D-representation of the sedimentation process. This parameter defines the time that passes between two steps in the simulation process. |
Abbreviations: NTA Nanoparticle Tracing Analysis, DLS Dynamic Light Scattering
Examples surface areas of the cell culture dish well bottoms and calculated medium fluid column heights (Attention: manufacturer dependent)
Examples for density and viscosity of different cell culture media at different temperatures
Abbreviations: DMEM Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium, DMSO Dimethyl sulfoxide