| Literature DB >> 32948164 |
Arisara Kiatsilapanan1, Sirilak Disatian Surachetpong2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) function plays an important role in diastolic dysfunction in cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) is a technique for assessing LA function. This study aimed to evaluate the LA function in HCM cats compared to normal cats, using 2D-STE.Entities:
Keywords: Cats; Heart; Left atrium; Strain
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32948164 PMCID: PMC7501631 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-02557-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
The general characteristics of cats in the control and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy groups
| Variable | Control | HCM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 5.05 ± 3.03 | 5 ± 3.43 | 0.963 |
| Body weight (Kg) | 4.47 ± 0.92 | 4.25 ± 1.04 | 0.497 |
Sex Male Female | 14 6 | 10 7 | 0.512 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 206 ± 20 | 209 ± 31 | 0.798 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 128 ± 20 | 116 ± 20 | 0.073 |
Breed Domestic Shorthair American shorthair Sphinx Scottish fold Siamese Exotic shorthair Persian Khao Manee | 10 5 1 2 1 1 - - | 10 - - - - 1 5 1 | 0.843 |
Age, body weight, heart rate and systolic blood pressure are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
Sex and breeds are expressed as the number of cats
Numerical data were compared by using the independent student t-test
Categorical data were compared by using Fisher’s Exact test
HCM Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Comparison of conventional echocardiographic values in the control and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy groups
| Variable | Control ( | HCM ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.24 ± 0.89 | 7.12 ± 1.14 | < 0.001* | |
| LVIDd(mm) | 14.31 ± 1.65 | 12.38 ± 3.03 | 0.027* |
| LVPWd(mm) | 3.5 ± 0.59 | 5.56 ± 1.64 | < 0.001* |
| IVSs(mm) | 7.18 ± 1.40 | 8.63 ± 1.86 | 0.01* |
| LVIDs(mm) | 6.35 ± 1.63 | 6.06 ± 2.38 | 0.669 |
| LVPWs(mm) | 7.01 ± 0.92 | 8.24 ± 1.94 | 0.026* |
| LA (mm) | 12.22 ± 1.42 | 15.55 ± 2.81 | < 0.001* |
| Ao (mm) | 8.66 ± 1.3 | 8.3 ± 1.73 | 0.476 |
| LA:Ao | 1.44 ± 0.28 | 1.92 ± 0.44 | < 0.001* |
| FS% | 55.58 ± 10.22 | 51.38 ± 10.79 | 0.233 |
| E (m/s) | 0.83 ± 0.19 | 0.62 ± 0.18 | 0.002* |
| A (m/s) | 0.61 ± 0.12 | 0.53 ± 0.29 | 0.346 |
| E:A | 1.34 ± 0.31 | 1.46 ± 0.74 | 0.09 |
| IVRT (m/s) | 45.7 ± 6.64 | 47.4 ± 9.12 | 0.504 |
| S (cm/s) | 0.46 ± 0.09 | 0.31 ± 0.13 | 0.001* |
| D (cm/s) | 0.35 ± 0.06 | 0.26 ± 0.12 | 0.006* |
| AR (cm/s) | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.16 ± 0.05 | 0.367 |
| S:D ratio | 1.25 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.22 | 0.464 |
| E′ (m/s) | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.056 |
| A′ (m/s) | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.07 ± 0.04 | 0.54 |
| S′ (m/s) | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.625 |
| E′:A′ ratio | 1.33 ± 0.31 | 1.15 ± 0.39 | 0.16 |
| E:E′ ratio | 7.8 ± 2.92 | 9.7 ± 6.8 | 0.265 |
| LA-FS (%) | 27.27 ± 6.94 | 14.95 ± 8.23 | < 0.001* |
| LA-EF (%) | 69.10 ± 13.64 | 46.09 ± 21.48 | 0.001* |
| FAC (%) | 63.73 ± 11.30 | 35.54 ± 18.07 | < 0.001* |
A peak velocity of early diastolic transmitral flow, A′ peak velocity of diastolic mitral annular motion as determined by pulsed wave Doppler, Ao Aorta, AR peak velocity of pulmonary vein flow reversal at atrial contraction, D peak velocity of diastolic pulmonary vein flow, E peak velocity of early diastolic transmitral flow, E′ peak velocity of early diastolic mitral annular motion as determined by pulsed wave Doppler, E:A ratio of E to A, E′A′ ratio of E′ to A′, E:E′ ratio of E to E′, FAC left atrial fractional area change, FS left ventricular fractional shortening, HCM hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, IVRT isovolumic (or isovolumetric) relaxation time, IVSd interventricular septum thickness at end-diastole, IVSs interventricular septum thickness at end-systole, LA left atrium, LA:Ao left atrial and aorta ratio, LA-EF left atrial ejection fraction, LA-FS left atrial fractional shortening, LVIDd left ventricular internal dimension at end -diastole, LVIDs left ventricular internal dimension at end -systole, LVPWd left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end-diastole, LVPWs left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end-systole, S peak velocity of systolic pulmonary vein, S′ peak velocity of systolic mitral annular motion as determined by pulsed wave Doppler, S:D ratio of S to D
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
* indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 assessed by the independent student t-test
Two-dimensional echocardiographic data of cats in the control and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy groups
| Variable | Control ( | HCM ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27.25 [21.18,32.97] | 13.33 [5.53,17.32] | < 0.001* | |
| Septal - base | 24.01 [15.84,40.74] | 12.30 [5.22,19.01] | 0.006* |
| Septal - mid | 32.12 [25.67,54.54] | 17.07 [6.48,24.82] | < 0.001* |
| Septal - roof | 17.18 [6.22,29.59] | 7.57 [3.23,13.13] | 0.063 |
| Lateral - roof | 18.43 [6.86,32.19] | 4.00 [-0.22,28.47] | 0.067 |
| Lateral- mid | 23.30 [18.17,35.77] | 15.83 [1.97,25.42] | 0.038* |
| Lateral- base | 37.42 [13.60,46.80] | 10.8 [7.22,17.23] | 0.002* |
PALS peak atrial longitudinal strain, HCM hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Data are expressed as median and 25th, 75th percentiles
* indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 by Mann-Whitney U Test
Fig. 1The Box and Whisker plot shows median and 25 to 75 percentile range of the atrial longitudinal strain in each region between the normal (blue) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) groups (orange)
Assessment of left atrial function of 3 subgroups of cats
| Variables | Control | HCM with | HCM with | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA-FS (%) | 25.27 [23.29,31.67] a | 17.4 [8.68, 19.67] b | 14.26 [6.38, 20.00] b | < 0.001* | |||
| LA-EF (%) | 64.97 [59.75,83.05] a | 36.53 [28.07, 75.9] b | 39.87 [25.45, 60.41] b | 0.002* | |||
| FAC (%) | 63.28 [57.46,72.31] a | 29.57 [14.66, 51.50] b | 32.09 [24.07, 52.39] b | < 0.001* | |||
| PALS (%) | 27.25 [21.18,32.97] a | 8.4 [5.53, 21.57] b | 14.50 [5.94, 18.34] b | < 0.001* | |||
FAC left atrial fractional area change, HCM hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, LAD left atrial diameter, LA-EF left atrial ejection fraction, LA-FS left atrial fractional shortening, PALS peak atrial longitudinal strain
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
*indicate statistical significance at P < 0.05 of 3 subgroups
The significance difference was assessed by Kruskal Wallis test
a and b indicate significant difference
The correlation of the peak atrial longitudinal strain and echocardiographic values assessed by conventional echocardiography in entire population
| Variable | r | |
|---|---|---|
| IVSd (mm) | -0.563 | < 0.001* |
| LVIDd (mm) | 0.362 | 0.028* |
| LVPWd (mm) | -0.516 | 0.001* |
| LA (mm) | -0.248 | 0.139 |
| LA:Ao | -0.315 | 0.058 |
| FS% | -0.061 | 0.721 |
| E (m/s) | 0.41 | 0.012* |
| A (m/s) | 0.277 | 0.107 |
| E:A | -0.191 | 0.271 |
| IVRT (m/s) | -0.204 | 0.240 |
| S (cm/s) | 0.41 | 0.013* |
| D (cm/s) | 0.341 | 0.042* |
| AR (cm/s) | 0.164 | 0.353 |
| S:D ratio | 0.164 | 0.338 |
| E′ (cm/s) | 0.459 | 0.004* |
| A′ (cm/s) | 0.117 | 0.523 |
| S′ (cm/s) | 0.078 | 0.651 |
| E′:A′ ratio | 0.132 | 0.435 |
| E:E′ ratio | -0.21 | 0.212 |
Abbreviations: A peak velocity of early diastolic transmitral flow, A′ peak velocity of diastolic mitral annular motion as determined by pulsed wave Doppler, AR Peak velocity of pulmonary vein flow reversal at atrial contraction, D Peak velocity of diastolic pulmonary vein flow, E Peak velocity of early diastolic transmitral flow, E′ Peak velocity of early diastolic mitral annular motion as determined by pulsed wave Doppler, E:A Ratio of E to A, E′A′ Ratio of E′ to A′, E:E′ Ratio of E to E′, FAC Left atrial fractional area change, FS Left ventricular fractional shortening, HCM Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, IVRT Isovolumic (or isovolumetric) relaxation time, IVSd Interventricular septum thickness at end-diastole, LA Left atrium, LA:Ao Left atrial and aorta ratio, LV Left ventricle, LVIDd Left ventricular internal dimension at end -diastole, LVPWd Left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end-diastole, S Peak velocity of systolic pulmonary vein, S′ Peak velocity of systolic mitral annular motion as determined by pulsed wave Doppler, S:D Ratio of S to D
The significant correlation was assessed by Pearson’s correlation coefficient
*indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05
Fig. 2Correlations between PALS and other LA function parameters and LA diameter using Pearson’s correlation coefficient; a. PALS and LA-FS (r=0.538, P=0.001) b. PALS and LA-EF (r=0.797, P <0.001) c. PALS and FAC (r=0.746, P <0.001) d. PALS and LAD (r=-0.248, P =0.139) in the control (white) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy groups (blue). PALS= peak atrial longitudinal strain; LA-FS= left atrial fractional shortening LA-EF= left atrial ejection fraction; FAC =left atrial fractional area change; LAD= left atrial diameter
Fig. 3The image of the left apical four-chamber view of the left atrial strain profile of a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy cat. A region of interest is manually drawn to include the left atrial wall. The automatic software system divided the left atrial wall into 6 different segments with different colors. A white dotted line is presented as the mean of strain value of the left atrium. LA=left atrium; LV= left ventricle; PALS= peak atrial longitudinal strain (white arrow); RA= right atrium; RV= right ventricle