| Literature DB >> 32948158 |
Ludmila Brodetska1, Larysa Natrus2, Olha Lisakovska3, Olexandr Kaniura1, Liudmyla Iakovenko4, Irina Skrypnyk1, Petro Flis1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tooth impaction is a common problem in orthodontic practice and in some cases accompanied by pain and pathological changes of surrounding teeth. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying tooth impaction allows finding the most effective orthodontic treatment for patients with impacted teeth (IT). RANK (receptor activator of NF-κB) / RANKL (RANK ligand) / OPG (osteoprotegerin) signaling pathway controls bone resorption and may be involved in the regulation of tooth eruption. The study aimed to evaluate bone remodeling based on the assessment of the RANKL/RANK/OPG status in patients with IT.Entities:
Keywords: Apoptosis; Bone remodeling; Impacted teeth; Nuclear factor kappa-B; Osteoclastogenesis; RANKL/RANK/OPG system; Tooth eruption
Year: 2020 PMID: 32948158 PMCID: PMC7501598 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01251-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Characteristics of 18 participants of the study (Kyiv, Ukraine) (n = 18, M ± m)
| Patients | Group | Patient № | Age range | Maxillary/ mandibular | Type of orthodontic treatment | Weight of bone tissue sample, g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with normally erupted teeth | #1 – bone tissue, that was taken from the area of the normally erupted third molar (control group) | 1 | 21–28 Mean ± SD | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0457 |
| 3 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0522 | |||
| 4 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0674 | |||
| 5 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0575 | |||
| 6 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0661 | |||
| 8 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0355 | |||
| Patients with tooth impaction | #2 – bone tissue of patients with tooth impaction, collected from the area of the normally erupted third molar | 9 | 21–29 Mean ± SD | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0341 |
| 10 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0481 | |||
| 11 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0452 | |||
| 12 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0503 | |||
| 13 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0388 | |||
| 14 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0426 | |||
| #3 – bone tissue of patients with tooth impaction, collected from the area of the impacted third molar | 15 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0513 | ||
| 16 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0641 | |||
| 17 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0852 | |||
| 18 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0374 | |||
| 19 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0371 | |||
| 20 | maxilla | Metal orthodontic brackets | 0.0509 |
Fig. 1Immunoblotting analysis of RANK, OPG, and osteocalcin in bone tissue samples: representative immunoblots are shown (a) and quantified using β-actin as a loading control. The bar graphs of RANK (b), OPG (c) and osteocalcin (d) are presented as arithmetic means ± SEM (n = 6/group): 1 – bone tissue of healthy persons (control group); 2 – bone tissue, that was taken near the healthy tooth in patients with tooth impaction; 3 – bone tissue, collected near the impacted tooth. Experiments were performed in triplicate and *p < 0.05 denotes significance compared with control, #p < 0.05 denotes significance compared with bone tissue taken near the healthy tooth in patients with tooth impaction
Fig. 2Immunoblotting analysis of RANKL in bone tissue samples: representative immunoblots are shown (a) and quantified using β-actin as a loading control. The bar graphs of the total content of RANKL (b), its membrane-bound (c) and soluble (d) forms are shown as arithmetic means ± SEM (n = 6/group): 1 – bone tissue of healthy persons (control group); 2 – bone tissue, that was taken near the healthy tooth in patients with tooth impaction; 3 – bone tissue, collected near the impacted tooth. Experiments were performed in triplicate and *p < 0.05 denotes significance compared with control, #p < 0.05 denotes significance compared with bone tissue taken near the healthy tooth in patients with tooth impaction
Ratios of the RANKL/RANK/OPG signaling pathway components in the bone tissue of patients, in a.u. (arbitrary units)
| Ratio, a.u. | Bone tissue, collected near the healthy tooth in patients with tooth impaction | Bone tissue, collected near the impacted tooth |
|---|---|---|
| RANK | 0.97 ± 0.06 | 1.73 ± 0.11* |
| RANKL | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 1.46 ± 0.12* |
| OPG | 0.8 ± 0,07 | 1.48 ± 0.13* |
| RANK/RANKL | 3.03 | 1.18* |
| RANKL/OPG | 0.4 | 0.99* |
* p < 0.05 vs. bone tissue taken near the healthy tooth in patients with tooth impaction
Fig. 3Immunoblotting analysis of NF-κB, NFATc1, and caspase-3 in bone tissue samples: representative immunoblots are shown (a, d) and normalized to β-actin. The bar graphs of NF-κB (b), NFATc1 (c), procaspase-3 (e) and its active subunit p17 (f) are demonstrated as arithmetic means ± SEM (n = 6/group): 1 – bone tissue of healthy persons (control group); 2 – bone tissue, that was taken near the healthy tooth in patients with tooth impaction; 3 – bone tissue, collected near the impacted tooth. Experiments were performed in triplicate and *p < 0.05 denotes significance compared with control, #p < 0.05 denotes significance compared with bone tissue taken near the healthy tooth in patients with tooth impaction