| Literature DB >> 32947929 |
Min Li1, Huan Li1, Ruo-Cheng Sheng1, Hui Sun1, Shou-Hui Sun2, Feng-Mao Chen1.
Abstract
Pine wilt disease was first discovered in Dongtang town, Liaoning Province, China, in 2017. However, no record of Monochamus alteratus existed in Fengcheng, where M. saltuarius is an indigenous insect, and no experimental evidence has thus far indicated that M. saltuarius can transport the Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in China. In this study, we investigated whether M. saltuarius is a vector of B. xylophilus in China. On the sixth day after eclosion, beetles began to transmit nematodes into the twigs. The transmission period of nematodes is known to be able to last for 48 days after beetle emergence. In laboratory experiments, M. saltuarius fed and transmitted B. xylophilus not only on pines but also on other non-Pinus conifers. The non-Pinus conifers preferred by M. saltuarius for feeding are Picea pungens, Picea asperata, and Abies fabri. The experimental results show that M. saltuarius functions as a vector of B. xylophilus in northeast China.Entities:
Keywords: conifer tree; host plants; pine sawyer; pinewood nematode
Year: 2020 PMID: 32947929 PMCID: PMC7564987 DOI: 10.3390/insects11090636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Figure 1The percentage of beetles carrying nematodes (◆) and the emergence of Monochamus saltuarius from pine timbers (◇) during the emergence period in 2018.
Summary of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus transmission by several Monochamus saltuarius individuals feeding on twigs of Pinus koraiensis during the entire feeding period.
| Code of Beetles | First Detection of Nematodes on Twig (Days after Beetle Emergence) | Total Number of Nematodes Transmitted to Twig | Number of Nematodes Retained in Dead Beetle | Number of Nematodes Transmitted Per Day (Max-Min) | Last Detection of Nematodes (Days after Beetle Emergence) | Number of Days of Nematode Presence in the Feeding Wound during the Entire Feeding Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | 49 | 0 | 21–1 | 48 | 21 |
| 2 | 18 | 64 | 0 | 50–2 | 48 | 18 |
| 3 | 9 | 100 | 5 | 43–1 | 27 | 12 |
| 4 | 9 | 118 | 21,000 | 116–2 | 21 | 12 |
| 5 | 15 | 63 | 33 | 38–1 | 48 | 21 |
| 6 | 12 | 44 | 586 | 23–1 | 24 | 18 |
| 7 | 6 | 69 | 0 | 22–1 | 33 | 21 |
| 8 | 9 | 69 | 3450 | 27–1 | 36 | 9 |
| 9 | 15 | 550 | 0 | 550–550 | 9 | 12 |
| 10 | 15 | 20 | 0 | 9–1 | 24 | 27 |
Number of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus isolated from treated trees in the experimental cage. Data represent the means ± SD of three replicates.
| Treatment | No. | Date of Death | Isolation of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Needles | Upper Stems | Middle Stems | Lower Stems | Branches | Roots | |||
| Treated trees in the experimental cage (with | 1 | August 31 | 573 ± 130 | 13,250 ± 2300 | 8760 ± 1750 | 8890 ± 1230 | 15,340 ± 4430 | 130 ± 75 |
| 2 | October 3 | 0 | 0 | 3200 ± 550 | 2250 ± 300 | 3595 ± 376 | 63 ± 10 | |
| 3 | August 31 | 330 ± 80 | 17,275 ± 5310 | 13,381 ± 3333 | 14,750 ± 2788 | 25,627 ± 8358 | 5112 ± 58 | |
| 4 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | |
| 5 | October 26 | 119 ± 27 | 810 ± 120 | 573 ± 50 | 0 | 1139 ± 298 | 0 | |
| Treated trees in the experimental cage (without | 1 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / |
| 2 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | |
| 3 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | |
| 4 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | |
| 5 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | |
Bark area consumed by Monochamus saltuarius and the number of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus entering twigs in 3 days. Data represent the means ± SD of three replicates. Means in the column followed by the same letter did not differ significantly at p < 0.05 (method of multiple comparisons).
| Tree Species | Bark Area Consumed/3 Days (mm2) | Number of |
|---|---|---|
|
| (694 ± 7) a | (11 ± 1) a |
|
| (650 ± 12) a | (17 ± 3) a |
|
| (517 ± 15) a | (13 ± 5) a |
|
| (444 ± 10) a | (11 ± 2) a |
|
| (316 ± 7) b | (11 ± 3) a |
|
| (308 ± 5) b | (16 ± 1) a |
|
| (335 ± 20) b | (11 ± 9) a |
|
| (314 ± 18) b | (17 ± 1) a |
|
| (205 ± 4) c | (13 ± 2) a |
|
| (139 ± 3) c | (9 ± 6) a |
|
| 736.6 | 1.421 |
|
| <0.0001 | 0.244 |
*: The favorite species of Monochamus saltuarius among the ten conifer species. ▲: The unpalatable species for Monochamus saltuarius among the ten conifer species.