Mark E Mikkelsen1, Mary Still2, Brian J Anderson1, O Joseph Bienvenu3, Martin B Brodsky3,4, Nathan Brummel5, Brad Butcher6, Alison S Clay7, Hali Felt1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29, Lauren E Ferrante8, Kimberley J Haines9, Michael O Harhay1,10, Aluko A Hope11, Ramona O Hopkins1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29, Megan Hosey3,4, Catherine Terri L Hough15, James C Jackson16, Annie Johnson17, Babar Khan18,19, Nazir I Lone20, Pamela MacTavish21, Joanne McPeake21, Ashley Montgomery-Yates22, Dale M Needham3,4, Giora Netzer23, Christa Schorr24, Becky Skidmore25, Joanna L Stollings26, Reba Umberger27, Adair Andrews28, Theodore J Iwashyna29, Carla M Sevin16. 1. Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 2. Department of Nursing, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 4. Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 5. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH. 6. Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. 7. Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. 8. Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 9. Department of Physiotherapy, Western Health, Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 10. Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Philadelphia, PA. 11. Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY. 12. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT. 13. Psychology Department and Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT. 14. Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Health Care, Murray, UT. 15. Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 16. Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 17. CCRN Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 18. Division of Pulmonary/Critical Care, Allergy and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. 19. Regenstrief Institute Inc., Indianapolis, IN. 20. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom. 21. Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scotland, United Kingdom. 22. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. 23. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 24. Critical Care Department, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ. 25. Independent Information Specialist, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 26. Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 27. Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, College of Nursing, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN. 28. Society of Critical Care Medicine, Mount Prospect, IL. 29. Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: After critical illness, new or worsening impairments in physical, cognitive, and/or mental health function are common among patients who have survived. Who should be screened for long-term impairments, what tools to use, and when remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: Provide pragmatic recommendations to clinicians caring for adult survivors of critical illness related to screening for postdischarge impairments. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one international experts in risk-stratification and assessment of survivors of critical illness, including practitioners involved in the Society of Critical Care Medicine's Thrive Post-ICU Collaboratives, survivors of critical illness, and clinical researchers. DESIGN: Society of Critical Care Medicine consensus conference on post-intensive care syndrome prediction and assessment, held in Dallas, in May 2019. A systematic search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library was conducted in 2018 and updated in 2019 to complete an original systematic review and to identify pre-existing systematic reviews. MEETING OUTCOMES: We concluded that existing tools are insufficient to reliably predict post-intensive care syndrome. We identified factors before (e.g., frailty, preexisting functional impairments), during (e.g., duration of delirium, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome), and after (e.g., early symptoms of anxiety, depression, or post-traumatic stress disorder) critical illness that can be used to identify patients at high-risk for cognitive, mental health, and physical impairments after critical illness in whom screening is recommended. We recommend serial assessments, beginning within 2-4 weeks of hospital discharge, using the following screening tools: Montreal Cognitive Assessment test; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Impact of Event Scale-Revised (post-traumatic stress disorder); 6-minute walk; and/or the EuroQol-5D-5L, a health-related quality of life measure (physical function). CONCLUSIONS: Beginning with an assessment of a patient's pre-ICU functional abilities at ICU admission, clinicians have a care coordination strategy to identify and manage impairments across the continuum. As hospital discharge approaches, clinicians should use brief, standardized assessments and compare these results to patient's pre-ICU functional abilities ("functional reconciliation"). We recommend serial assessments for post-intensive care syndrome-related problems continue within 2-4 weeks of hospital discharge, be prioritized among high-risk patients, using the identified screening tools to prompt referrals for services and/or more detailed assessments.
BACKGROUND: After critical illness, new or worsening impairments in physical, cognitive, and/or mental health function are common among patients who have survived. Who should be screened for long-term impairments, what tools to use, and when remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: Provide pragmatic recommendations to clinicians caring for adult survivors of critical illness related to screening for postdischarge impairments. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one international experts in risk-stratification and assessment of survivors of critical illness, including practitioners involved in the Society of Critical Care Medicine's Thrive Post-ICU Collaboratives, survivors of critical illness, and clinical researchers. DESIGN: Society of Critical Care Medicine consensus conference on post-intensive care syndrome prediction and assessment, held in Dallas, in May 2019. A systematic search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library was conducted in 2018 and updated in 2019 to complete an original systematic review and to identify pre-existing systematic reviews. MEETING OUTCOMES: We concluded that existing tools are insufficient to reliably predict post-intensive care syndrome. We identified factors before (e.g., frailty, preexisting functional impairments), during (e.g., duration of delirium, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome), and after (e.g., early symptoms of anxiety, depression, or post-traumatic stress disorder) critical illness that can be used to identify patients at high-risk for cognitive, mental health, and physical impairments after critical illness in whom screening is recommended. We recommend serial assessments, beginning within 2-4 weeks of hospital discharge, using the following screening tools: Montreal Cognitive Assessment test; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Impact of Event Scale-Revised (post-traumatic stress disorder); 6-minute walk; and/or the EuroQol-5D-5L, a health-related quality of life measure (physical function). CONCLUSIONS: Beginning with an assessment of a patient's pre-ICU functional abilities at ICU admission, clinicians have a care coordination strategy to identify and manage impairments across the continuum. As hospital discharge approaches, clinicians should use brief, standardized assessments and compare these results to patient's pre-ICU functional abilities ("functional reconciliation"). We recommend serial assessments for post-intensive care syndrome-related problems continue within 2-4 weeks of hospital discharge, be prioritized among high-risk patients, using the identified screening tools to prompt referrals for services and/or more detailed assessments.
Authors: Konstantinos Dimitriadis; Jan Meis; Hermann Neugebauer; Kristian Barlinn; Bernhard Neumann; Georg Gahn; Piergiorgio Lochner; Benjamin Knier; Sarah Lindemann; Kurt Wolfram Sühs; Kristina Szabo; Thomas Pfefferkorn; Ingo Schirotzek; Tobias Freilinger; Bassa Burc; Albrecht Günther; Matthias Wittstock; Patrick Schramm; Gernot Reimann; Jana Godau; Gabor Nagy; Fatima B Koenig; Fabian Essig; Hartwig Klinker; Christian Hartmann; Moritz L Schmidbauer; Tim Steinberg; Lora Lefterova; Christina Klose; Julian Bösel Journal: Crit Care Date: 2022-07-16 Impact factor: 19.334
Authors: Jessica A Palakshappa; Kathryn E Callahan; Nicholas M Pajewski; Daniel Clark Files; James J Willard; Jeff D Williamson Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2021-10
Authors: Anne C M Cuijpers; Marielle M E Coolsen; Ronny M Schnabel; Tim Lubbers; Iwan C C van der Horst; Susanne van Santen; Steven W M Olde Damink; Marcel C G van de Poll Journal: J Intensive Care Med Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 2.889
Authors: Joanne McPeake; Theodore J Iwashyna; Philip Henderson; Alastair H Leyland; Daniel Mackay; Tara Quasim; Matthew Walters; Michael Harhay; Martin Shaw Journal: Lancet Reg Health Eur Date: 2021-07
Authors: Kimberley J Haines; Elizabeth Hibbert; Nina Leggett; Leanne M Boehm; Tarli Hall; Rita N Bakhru; Anthony J Bastin; Brad W Butcher; Tammy L Eaton; Wendy Harris; Aluko A Hope; James Jackson; Annie Johnson; Janet A Kloos; Karen A Korzick; Pamela Mactavish; Joel Meyer; Ashley Montgomery-Yates; Tara Quasim; Andrew Slack; Dorothy Wade; Mary Still; Giora Netzer; Ramona O Hopkins; Theodore J Iwashyna; Mark E Mikkelsen; Joanne McPeake; Carla M Sevin Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 9.296