Cindy Richter1, Anna Weinreich2, Simone Mucha1, Dorothee Saur3, Johann Otto Pelz4. 1. Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 2. Epilepsy-Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Berlin, Germany. 3. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. 4. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. johann.pelz@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The interdisciplinary German guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS) recommend a multiparametric approach for the sonographic grading of extracranial ICAS. The aim of this study is to evaluate the interrater and intermethod agreement of this elaborated sonographic approach with different angiographic modalities. METHODS: Patients with extracranial ICAS were examined twice with colour-coded duplex sonography (CDS) by two experienced vascular neurologists. Each of the ten criteria and the resulting stenotic value were assessed. Grading of ICAS based on the multiparametric ultrasound criteria was compared with different angiography modalities (magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), digital subtraction angiography (DSA)). RESULTS: Seventy-four consecutive patients with 91 extracranial ICAS were recruited from our stroke unit and neurovascular outpatient clinic. Interrater agreement for each single ultrasound criterion ranged from moderate to excellent (for the peak systolic velocity). Concerning the absolute stenotic value of ICAS, an excellent agreement between both ultrasound examiners with an ICC of 0.91 (range 0.87-0.94; p < 0.001) was found. In 96% of ICAS, the difference between the stenotic values was ≤ 10%. Intermethod agreements between CDS and DSA, CTA, and MRA were also good for both sonographers. CONCLUSION: Strictly adhering to the multiparametric "DEGUM ultrasound criteria", we found an excellent interrater agreement and a good intermethod agreement compared with angiography for the sonographic grading of extracranial ICAS. Thus, multiparametric CDS is in particular suitable for the follow up of extracranial ICAS even when examinations are done by different sonographers.
PURPOSE: The interdisciplinary German guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS) recommend a multiparametric approach for the sonographic grading of extracranial ICAS. The aim of this study is to evaluate the interrater and intermethod agreement of this elaborated sonographic approach with different angiographic modalities. METHODS:Patients with extracranial ICAS were examined twice with colour-coded duplex sonography (CDS) by two experienced vascular neurologists. Each of the ten criteria and the resulting stenotic value were assessed. Grading of ICAS based on the multiparametric ultrasound criteria was compared with different angiography modalities (magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), digital subtraction angiography (DSA)). RESULTS: Seventy-four consecutive patients with 91 extracranial ICAS were recruited from our stroke unit and neurovascular outpatient clinic. Interrater agreement for each single ultrasound criterion ranged from moderate to excellent (for the peak systolic velocity). Concerning the absolute stenotic value of ICAS, an excellent agreement between both ultrasound examiners with an ICC of 0.91 (range 0.87-0.94; p < 0.001) was found. In 96% of ICAS, the difference between the stenotic values was ≤ 10%. Intermethod agreements between CDS and DSA, CTA, and MRA were also good for both sonographers. CONCLUSION: Strictly adhering to the multiparametric "DEGUM ultrasound criteria", we found an excellent interrater agreement and a good intermethod agreement compared with angiography for the sonographic grading of extracranial ICAS. Thus, multiparametric CDS is in particular suitable for the follow up of extracranial ICAS even when examinations are done by different sonographers.
Entities:
Keywords:
Carotid artery disease; DEGUM ultrasound criteria; Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis; Interrater and intermethod agreement; Ultrasound
Authors: Richard E Latchaw; Mark J Alberts; Michael H Lev; John J Connors; Robert E Harbaugh; Randall T Higashida; Robert Hobson; Chelsea S Kidwell; Walter J Koroshetz; Vincent Mathews; Pablo Villablanca; Steven Warach; Beverly Walters Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-09-24 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Kristian Barlinn; Thomas Floegel; Hagen H Kitzler; Jessica Kepplinger; Timo Siepmann; Lars-Peder Pallesen; Ulf Bodechtel; Heinz Reichmann; Andrei V Alexandrov; Volker Puetz Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 2.804