Luisa Semmler1, Heidi Weberruß2, Lisa Baumgartner2, Raphael Pirzer3, Renate Oberhoffer-Fritz2. 1. Institute of Preventive Pediatrics, Technical University, Munich, Germany. luisa.semmler@tum.de. 2. Institute of Preventive Pediatrics, Technical University, Munich, Germany. 3. Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, University Hospital, Augsburg, Germany.
Abstract
In children, arterial alterations occur with increased intima-media thickness as well as vascular diameter enlargement. Both conditions correlate with higher cardiovascular risk in adults, and both the array and proportion of these alterations are important hemodynamic parameters. In terms of functional adaptation processes, they influence several arterial wall properties as for example the shear and tensile stress of the vessel. There are no reference values for the vascular diameter and intima-media thickness/diameter ratio of the carotid artery in children. Therefore, this study aimed to assess vascular diameter, intima-media thickness/diameter ratio and related tensile stress values in children and to further investigate the influence of sex, age, body mass index, and blood pressure. The parameters were measured with high-resolution semi-automated ultrasound. Sex- and age-dependent values were calculated with the LMS method for a cross-sectional sample of 642 healthy, non-obese children aged 8-17 years. The mean vascular diameter was 5.45 ± 0.46 mm; the median intima-media thickness/diameter ratio was 0.085 (0.079-0.092); the median tensile stress was 105.4 (95.2-116.4) kPa. The vascular diameter and the tensile stress were higher, and the intima-media thickness/diameter ratio was lower in boys than in girls. In comparison to the normal weight study population the excludedobese children had a significantly higher diameter, a lower intima-media thickness/diameter ratio, and a higher tensile stress. In multiple regression analyses of diameter, intima-media thickness/diameter ratio, and tensile stress, all parameters were influenced by sex and body mass index. Furthermore, systolic and diastolic blood pressure significantly influenced the vascular diameter, and systolic blood pressure significantly influenced the intima-media thickness/diameter ratio. Conclusion: This study is the first to report values for the diameter, the intima-media thickness/diameter ratio of the carotid artery, and the related tensile stress allowing a more differentiated view of cardiovascular adaptations as it combines structural and functional vascular parameters. What is known: • Intima-media thickness and vascular diameter are related to a higher cardiovascular risk in adults • The intima-media thickness/diameter ratio gives information about hemodynamic and functional vessel adaptation What is new: • Values for vascular diameter, intima-media thickness/diameter ratio, and tensile stress of the carotid artery in children are presented in this study • Intima-media thickness as a surrogate marker for arterial health in children should be complemented by intima-media thickness/diameter ratio measurement.
In children, arterial alterations occur with increased intima-media thickness as well as vascular diameter enlargement. Both conditions correlate with higher cardiovascular risk in adults, and both the array and proportion of these alterations are important hemodynamic parameters. In terms of functional adaptation processes, they influence several arterial wall properties as for example the shear and tensile stress of the vessel. There are no reference values for the vascular diameter and intima-media thickness/diameter ratio of the carotid artery in children. Therefore, this study aimed to assess vascular diameter, intima-media thickness/diameter ratio and related tensile stress values in children and to further investigate the influence of sex, age, body mass index, and blood pressure. The parameters were measured with high-resolution semi-automated ultrasound. Sex- and age-dependent values were calculated with the LMS method for a cross-sectional sample of 642 healthy, non-obesechildren aged 8-17 years. The mean vascular diameter was 5.45 ± 0.46 mm; the median intima-media thickness/diameter ratio was 0.085 (0.079-0.092); the median tensile stress was 105.4 (95.2-116.4) kPa. The vascular diameter and the tensile stress were higher, and the intima-media thickness/diameter ratio was lower in boys than in girls. In comparison to the normal weight study population the excludedobesechildren had a significantly higher diameter, a lower intima-media thickness/diameter ratio, and a higher tensile stress. In multiple regression analyses of diameter, intima-media thickness/diameter ratio, and tensile stress, all parameters were influenced by sex and body mass index. Furthermore, systolic and diastolic blood pressure significantly influenced the vascular diameter, and systolic blood pressure significantly influenced the intima-media thickness/diameter ratio. Conclusion: This study is the first to report values for the diameter, the intima-media thickness/diameter ratio of the carotid artery, and the related tensile stress allowing a more differentiated view of cardiovascular adaptations as it combines structural and functional vascular parameters. What is known: • Intima-media thickness and vascular diameter are related to a higher cardiovascular risk in adults • The intima-media thickness/diameter ratio gives information about hemodynamic and functional vessel adaptation What is new: • Values for vascular diameter, intima-media thickness/diameter ratio, and tensile stress of the carotid artery in children are presented in this study • Intima-media thickness as a surrogate marker for arterial health in children should be complemented by intima-media thickness/diameter ratio measurement.
Authors: Mieczyslaw Litwin; Elke Wühl; Claudia Jourdan; Justyna Trelewicz; Anna Niemirska; Kathrin Fahr; Katarzyna Jobs; Ryszard Grenda; Zbigniew T Wawer; Pawel Rajszys; Jörgen Tröger; Otto Mehls; Franz Schaefer Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2005-03-16 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Mikko J Järvisalo; Anne Putto-Laurila; Laura Jartti; Terho Lehtimäki; Tiina Solakivi; Tapani Rönnemaa; Olli T Raitakari Journal: Diabetes Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Robert Dalla Pozza; Doris Ehringer-Schetitska; Peter Fritsch; Eero Jokinen; Andreas Petropoulos; Renate Oberhoffer Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Philip Joseph; Darryl Leong; Martin McKee; Sonia S Anand; Jon-David Schwalm; Koon Teo; Andrew Mente; Salim Yusuf Journal: Circ Res Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Lucia Pacifico; Vito Cantisani; Paolo Ricci; John F Osborn; Elisa Schiavo; Caterina Anania; Eva Ferrara; Giuliano Dvisic; Claudio Chiesa Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Grace A McComsey; Maryann O'Riordan; Stanley L Hazen; Dalia El-Bejjani; Shweta Bhatt; Marie-Luise Brennan; Norma Storer; Jerome Adell; Dean A Nakamoto; Vikram Dogra Journal: AIDS Date: 2007-05-11 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Isabella C P Rodrigues; Éder S N Lopes; Karina D Pereira; Stephany C Huber; André Luiz Jardini; Joyce M Annichino-Bizzacchi; Augusto D Luchessi; Laís P Gabriel Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Amanda A de Oliveira; Fernanda Priviero; Ana Delgado; Pengfei Dong; Valentina O Mendoza; Linxia Gu; R Clinton Webb; Kenia P Nunes Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-09-25 Impact factor: 6.208