| Literature DB >> 33791599 |
Lisa Baumgartner1, Heidi Weberruß1, Katharina Appel1, Tobias Engl1, Daniel Goeder1, Renate Oberhoffer-Fritz1, Thorsten Schulz1.
Abstract
Young athletes most often exceed the physical activity recommendations of the World Health Organization. Therefore, they are of special interest for investigating cardiovascular adaptions to exercise. This study aimed to examine the arterial structure and function of young athletes 12-17 years old and compare these parameters to reference values of healthy cohorts. Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), carotid diameter, cIMT÷carotid diameter-ratio (cIDR), arterial compliance (AC), elastic modulus (Ep), β stiffness index (β), and carotid pulse wave velocity (PWVβ) were determined using ultrasound in 331 young athletes (77 girls; mean age, 14.6 ± 1.30 years). Central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) and aortic PWV (aPWV) were measured using the oscillometric device Mobil-O-Graph. Standard deviation scores (SDS) of all parameters were calculated according to German reference values. The 75th and 90th percentiles were defined as the threshold for elevated cIMT and arterial stiffness, respectively. Activity behavior was assessed with the MoMo physical activity questionnaire, and maximum power output with a standard cardiopulmonary exercise test. One-sample t-tests were performed to investigate the significant deviations in SDS values compared to the value "0". All subjects participated in competitive sports for at least 6 h per week (565.6 ± 206.0 min/week). Of the 331 young athletes, 135 (40.2%) had cIMT >75th percentile, 71 (21.5%) had cSBP >90th percentile, and 94 (28.4%) had aPWV>90th percentile. We observed higher cIMT SDS (p < 0.001), cIDR SDS (p = 0.009), and AC SDS (p < 0.001) but lower β SDS (p < 0.001), Ep SDS (p < 0.001), and PWVβ SDS (p < 0.001) compared to the reference cohort. The cSBP SDS (p < 0.001) and aPWV SDS (p < 0.001) were elevated. In conclusion, cIMT and cIDR were higher in young athletes than in a reference cohort. Furthermore, young athletes presented better carotid elasticity and lower arterial stiffness of the carotid artery. However, central arterial stiffness was higher compared to the reference cohort. The thickening of the carotid intima-media complex in combination with a reduction in arterial stiffness indicates a physiological adaptation to exercise in youth.Entities:
Keywords: arterial elasticity; arterial stiffness; carotid intima-media thickness; exercise; young athletes
Year: 2021 PMID: 33791599 PMCID: PMC8005716 DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2021.633873
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Sports Act Living ISSN: 2624-9367
Figure 1Flowchart of inclusion and exclusion of study subjects.
Study characteristics.
| Age (yrs) | 14.6 ± 1.30 | 14.7 ± 1.31 | 14.6 ± 1.28 | 0.556 |
| Body mass (kg) | 59.1 ± 12.4 | 60.0 ± 13.1 | 56.2 ± 9.12 | |
| Body height (cm) | 170.7 ± 11.3 | 172.1 ± 11.8 | 166.1 ± 8.34 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.1 ± 2.48 | 20.0 ± 2.52 | 20.3 ± 2.32 | 0.340 |
| BSA (m2) | 1.67 ± 0.23 | 1.69 ± 0.24 | 1.61 ± 0.16 | |
| bSBP (mmHg) | 115.7 ± 9.29 | 116.5 ± 9.51 | 113.1 ± 8.00 | |
| bDBP (mmHg) | 65.0 ± 6.20 | 64.9 ± 6.28 | 65.5 ± 5.97 | 0.440 |
| Training duration (min/week) | 565.6 ± 206.0 | 546.8 ± 192.7 | 619.2 ± 237.6 | |
| Training intensity (MET-hours-index) | 87.7 ± 33.8 | 85.8 ± 29.1 | 94.2 ± 45.9 | 0.138 |
| Training experience (years) | 3.65 ± 2.51 | 3.70 ± 2.52 | 3.50 ± 2.48 | 0.550 |
| Maximum power output (W) | 268.9 ± 63.0 | 280.1 ± 65.0 | 232.0 ± 36.9 | |
| Maximum power output (W/kg) | 4.56 ± 0.54 | 4.68 ± 0.49 | 4.16 ± 0.52 | |
| cIMT (mm) | 0.48 ± 0.04 | 0.49 ± 0.04 | 0.47 ± 0.04 | |
| Carotid diameter (mm) | 5.65 ± 0.45 | 5.68 ± 0.46 | 5.56 ± 0.40 | |
| cIDR (%) | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.174 |
| AC (mm2/kPa) | 1.52 ± 0.33 | 1.53 ± 0.33 | 1.49 ± 0.35 | 0.294 |
| β | 3.23 ± 0.72 | 3.23 ± 0.71 | 3.23 ± 0.73 | 0.934 |
| Ep (kPa) | 37.9 ± 8.70 | 37.9 ± 8.55 | 37.8 ± 9.26 | 0.956 |
| PWVβ (m/s) | 3.61 ± 0.37 | 3.61 ± 0.36 | 3.63 ± 0.42 | 0.652 |
| cSPB (mmHg) | 106.5 ± 10.1 | 107.4 ± 10.4 | 103.3 ± 7.92 | |
| aPWV (m/s) | 4.96 ± 0.43 | 5.02 ± 0.44 | 4.79 ± 0.32 |
BMI, body mass index; BSA, body surface area; bSBP, brachial systolic blood pressure; bDBP, brachial diastolic blood pressure; MET, metabolic equivalent; cIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; cIDR, carotid intima-media thickness÷carotid diameter ratio; AC, arterial compliance; β, beta stiffness index; Ep, elastic modulus; PWVβ, carotid pulse wave velocity; cSBP, central systolic blood pressure; aPWV, aortic pulse wave velocity. Significant results are marked in bold.
SDS values of parameters of body height, BMI, blood pressure, physical performance and vascular properties.
| Body height SDS | 0.37 ± 1.14 | |
| BMI SDS | 0.02 ± 0.77 | 0.684 |
| bSBP SDS | 0.03 ± 0.95 | 0.561 |
| bDBP SDS | −0.45 ± 0.91 | |
| Maximum power output SDS | 1.85 ± 1.15 | |
| cIMT SDS | 0.37 ± 1.34 | |
| Carotid diameter SDS | 0.08 ± 0.98 | 0.133 |
| cIDR SDS | 0.20 ± 1.41 | |
| AC SDS | 0.99 ± 0.83 | |
| β SDS | −0.75 ± 0.88 | |
| Ep SDS | −0.88 ± 0.93 | |
| PWVβ SDS | −1.04 ± 0.97 | |
| cSBP SDS | 0.42 ± 1.29 | |
| aPWV SDS | 0.55 ± 1.33 |
BMI, body mass index; bSBP, brachial systolic blood pressure; bDBP, brachial diastolic blood pressure; cIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; cIDR, carotid intima-media thickness÷carotid diameter ratio; AC, arterial compliance; β, beta stiffness index; Ep, elastic modulus; PWVβ, carotid pulse wave velocity; cSBP, central systolic blood pressure; aPWV, aortic pulse wave velocity. Significant results are marked in bold.
Intra- and inter-observer reliability of ultrasound parameters (coefficient of variation).
| cIMT | 0.58 | 2.09 |
| Carotid diameter | 0.87 | 3.63 |
| cIDR | 0.81 | 4.38 |
| AC | 1.63 | 6.59 |
| β | 3.40 | 13.54 |
| Ep | 4.49 | 13.11 |
| PWVβ | 1.46 | 5.57 |
cIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; cIDR, carotid intima-media thickness÷carotid diameter ratio; AC, arterial compliance; β, beta stiffness index; Ep, elastic modulus; PWVβ, carotid pulse wave velocity.
Figure 2Mean ± standard deviation of SDS of vascular parameters. cIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; cIDR, carotid intima-media thickness÷carotid diameter ratio; AC, arterial compliance; β, beta stiffness index; Ep, elastic modulus; PWVβ, carotid pulse wave velocity; cSBP, central systolic blood pressure; aPWV, aortic pulse wave velocity.