| Literature DB >> 32944328 |
Leo Bockeria1, Thierry Carrel2, Anais Lemaire3, Vladimir Makarenko1, Alex Kim1, Konstantin Shatalov1, Martijn Cox4, Oleg Svanidze4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To present a 2-year follow-up regarding safety and hemodynamic performance of a new restorative vascular graft used as extracardiac cavo-pulmonary connection in patients with univentricular congenital heart malformations.Entities:
Keywords: Extracardiac conduit; Fontan procedure; bioabsorbable polymer; congenital heart disease; endogenous tissue restoration; restorative vascular graft
Year: 2020 PMID: 32944328 PMCID: PMC7475567 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-19-739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Thorac Dis ISSN: 2072-1439 Impact factor: 2.895
Transthoracic echo and angiography values prior to surgery
| Demographics | Value (N=5) |
|---|---|
| Tricuspid valve atresia | 3 |
| Hypoplastic left heart syndrome | 2 |
| Previous surgery | Glenn shunt (n=5); Norwood + modified aorto-pulmonary (AP) shunt (n=2) |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) | 62.6±3.3 |
| Systolic pulmonary artery pressure | 14.8±2.6 |
| Diastolic pulmonary artery pressure | 7±0.9 |
| Regurgitation AV valve | Minimum to mild |
| Regurgitation outflow valve | None |
| Outflow tract obstruction isthmus | None |
| Outflow tract obstruction aortic arch | None |
Transthoracic echocardiographic data at 12 and 24 months
| Patient No. | 12 month | 24 month | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mid conduit diameter/wall thickness | Turbulence | Thrombus | Mid conduit diameter/wall thickness | Turbulence | Thrombus | ||
| Patient 1 (18 mm) | 18/0.4 | No | No | 16/0.6 | No | No | |
| Patient 2 (20 mm) | 20/0.5 | No | No | 17/0.3–0.4 | No | No | |
| Patient 3 (18 mm) | 18/0.5 | No | No | 18/0.55 | No | No | |
| Patient 4 (18 mm) | 17/0.6 | No | No | 18/0.55 | Yes | No | |
| Patient 5 (20 mm) | 18/0.5 | No | No | ND/ND | No | No | |
ND, impossible to determine by transthoracic echocardiography.
Figure 1One and 2-year MRI controls on frontal views with 4D flow evaluation showing good flow in the vascular graft with no turbulence. RPA, right pulmonary artery; SVC, superior vena cava; LPA, left pulmonary artery; IVC, inferior vena cava.
Conduit diameter in mm: at surgical implantation (device diameter); at 12 months, and at 24 months (MRI assessment)
| Patient No. | Conduit diameter at | Conduit diameter at 12 months | Conduit diameter at 24 months | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVC | Mid | IVC | SVC | Mid | IVC | |||
| Patient 1 | 18 | 16 | 20 | 13.2 | 14* | 19.7 | 14.5 | |
| Patient 2 | 20 | 16.5 | 16 | 19.6 | 17.4 | 18.0 | 19.1 | |
| Patient 3 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 19.4 | 19.5 | 19.7 | |
| Patient 4 | 18 | 17.9 | 18.2 | 19.7 | 18.5 | 19.7 | 18.6 | |
| Patient 5 | 20 | NA | NA | NA | 18.3 | 18.0 | 17.4 | |
*, this patient developed significant narrowing at the level of the superior vena cava (SVC); the reason was not clear but this problem may have been induced by insufficient mobilization of the SVC and therefore tension on the anastomosis. MRI evaluation of the conduit was assessed at three levels: SVC, in the middle segment of the graft (mid) and at the level of the inferior vena cava (IVC). NA, not available.