| Literature DB >> 32942724 |
Ryoma Morigaki1,2,3, Ryosuke Miyamoto3,4, Hideo Mure2,3, Koji Fujita4, Taku Matsuda1,2,5, Yoko Yamamoto2, Masahito Nakataki6, Tetsuya Okahisa5, Yuki Matsumoto7, Kazuhisa Miyake1,2, Nobuaki Yamamoto1,4, Ryuji Kaji4, Yasushi Takagi2, Satoshi Goto3,8.
Abstract
The diagnosis and treatment of functional movement disorders are challenging for clinicians who manage patients with movement disorders. The borderline between functional and organic dystonia is often ambiguous. Patients with functional dystonia are poor responders to pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) and are not good candidates for DBS surgery. Thus, if patients with medically refractory dystonia have functional features, they are usually left untreated with DBS surgery. In order to investigate the outcome of functional dystonia in response to pallidal DBS surgery, we retrospectively included five patients with this condition. Their dystonia was diagnosed as organic by dystonia specialists and also as functional according to the Fahn and Williams criteria or the Gupta and Lang Proposed Revisions. Microelectrode recordings in the globus pallidus internus of all patients showed a cell-firing pattern of bursting with interburst intervals, which is considered typical of organic dystonia. Although their clinical course after DBS surgery was incongruent to organic dystonia, the outcome was good. Our results question the possibility to clearly differentiate functional dystonia from organic dystonia. We hypothesized that functional dystonia can coexist with organic dystonia, and that medically intractable dystonia with combined functional and organic features can be successfully treated by DBS surgery.Entities:
Keywords: deep brain stimulation; dystonia disorder; movement disorders; neuronal plasticity; somatoform disorder
Year: 2020 PMID: 32942724 PMCID: PMC7563555 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10090636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Sci ISSN: 2076-3425
Characteristics of patients with borderline dystonia who underwent bilateral pallidal deep brain stimulation.
| Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | Patient 5 | Mean ± SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) at the surgery | 15 | 33 | 35 | 22 | 36 | 28.2 ± 9.3 |
| Sex | F | F | F | F | M | - |
| Age at onset (yr) | 13 | 25 | 32 | 20 | 34 | 24.8 ± 8.6 |
| Duration of disease (yr) | 2 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 1.5 | 3.3 ± 2.7 |
| Type of dystonia | Generalized | Generalized | Generalized | Generalized | Hemidystonia | - |
| Core dystonic feature | a | a, b | a, b | b | a | - |
| Other symptoms related to the organic dystonia | c | c, d | c, e | c, e, f | c, e | - |
| Fahn-Williams criteria | Clinically established | Documented | Documented | Documented | Documented | - |
| Gupta and Lang proposed revisions | Clinically definite | Clinically definite | Clinically definite | Clinically definite | Clinically definite | - |
| Diagnosed psychiatric disturbance | BPD | Panic disorder, DD | DD | BPD | None | - |
| Therapies received before (upper column) and after (lower column) DBS | M, BTX, R, PT | M, BTX, rTMS, R | M, BTX, baclofen (trial), R | M, BTX, R, PT | M, BTX, R | |
| M, BTX, baclofen (trial), R, PT, OSSCS | M, R | M, R | M, R, PT | M, BTX, R |
SD: standard deviation, a: dystonic posture, b: dystonic movement, c: action dystonia, d: morning benefit, e: mirroring, f: overflow, BPD: borderline personality disorder, DD: dissociative disorder, DBS: deep brain stimulation, M: medications, BTX: botulinum toxin, R: rehabilitation, PT: psychotherapy, OSSCS: orthopedic selective spasticity-control surgery, rTMS: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Detailed information about pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with borderline dystonia.
| Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | Patient 5 | Mean ± SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-up after surgery (months) | 55 | 52 | 36 | 13 | 9 | 33.0 ± 21.4 |
| Implanted devices system | Model 3387 | 4 contacts leads | 4 contacts leads | Directional leads | Directional lead | - |
| Stimulation parameters | ||||||
| Electrode right/left | 2+1-/2+1- | 2+1-/2+1- | C+2-/C+2- | C+1-2-3-4-/C+1-2-3-4- | NA/C+3-4-5-6- | - |
| Current (mA) right/left | 1.5/3.1 | 1.1/1.6 | 2.3/1.9 | 4.6/4.6 | -/4.8 | 2.2 ± 1.6/3.2 ± 1.5 |
| Pulse width (μS) right/left | 120/420 | 200/250 | 200/150 | 60/60 | /180 | 110 ± 66.3/194 ± 150.3 |
| Frequency (Hz) right/left | 80/80 | 60/60 | 180/180 | 130/130 | /20 | 100 ± 35.6/84 ± 47.2 |
| BFMDRS-M (max = 120) | ||||||
| Preoperatively | 70 | 68.5 | 59.5 | 51 | 45.5 | 58.9 ± 10.7 |
| Postoperatively | 26 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 9.8 ± 12.6 |
| Percent improvement (%) | 62.9 | 100 | 98.3 | 98.0 | 53.8 | 82.6 ± 22.4 |
| BFMDRS-D (max = 30) | ||||||
| Preoperatively | 14 | 16 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 12.8 ± 2.4 |
| Postoperatively | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3.2 ± 4.4 |
| Percent improvement (%) | 50.0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 18.2 | 73.6 ± 37.8 |
SD: standard deviation, NA: not available, BS: Boston Scientific co., BFMDRS-M, -D: Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale-motor score, -disability score.
Comparison of patients with functional dystonia, tardive dystonia, and Meige syndrome.
| Type of Dystonia | Age (yr) | Duration (yr) | BFMDRS-M (max = 120), Mean ± S.D. | BFMDRS-D (max = 30) Mean ± S.D. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperatively | Postoperatively | Percent Improvement (%) | Preoperatively | Postoperatively | Percent Improvement (%) | |||
| Functional dystonia ( | 28.2 ± 9.3 *,†† | 3.3 ± 2.7 †† | 58.9 ± 10.7 † | 9.8 ± 12.6 | 82.6 ± 22.4 | 12.8 ± 2.4 | 3.2 ± 4.4 | 73.6 ± 37.8 |
| Tardive dystonia [ | 44.5 ± 8.7 | 3.1 ± 2.2 †† | 30.8 ± 22.7 | 3.8 ± 3.8 | 85.5 ± 14.4 | 9.3 ± 4.8 | 1.8 ± 1.7 | 80.2 ± 12.2 |
| Meige syndrome [ | 64.6 ± 7.2 | 12.4 ± 4.2 | 22.2 ± 12.4 | 3.1 ± 1.7 | 84.2 ± 6.8 | 11.2 ± 7.9 | 1.4 ± 1.5 | 89.4 ± 8.0 |
BFMDRS-M or -D: Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating score-motor scale or -disability scale. * p < 0.05 vs. Tardive dystonia, † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01 vs. Meige syndrome. One-way ANOVA followed by the Games-Howell test was used.