Literature DB >> 28690015

Causes of failure of pallidal deep brain stimulation in cases with pre-operative diagnosis of isolated dystonia.

K Amande M Pauls1, Joachim K Krauss2, Constanze E Kämpfer3, Andrea A Kühn4, Christoph Schrader5, Martin Südmeyer6, Niels Allert7, Rainer Benecke8, Christian Blahak9, Jana K Boller3, Gereon R Fink10, Wolfgang Fogel11, Thomas Liebig12, Faycal El Majdoub13, Philipp Mahlknecht14, Josef Kessler3, Joerg Mueller15, Juergen Voges16, Matthias Wittstock8, Alexander Wolters8, Mohammad Maarouf13, Elena Moro17, Jens Volkmann18, Kailash P Bhatia19, Lars Timmermann3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pallidal deep brain stimulation (GPi-DBS) is an effective therapy for isolated dystonia, but 10-20% of patients show improvement below 25-30%. We here investigated causes of insufficient response to GPi-DBS in isolated dystonia in a cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Patients with isolated dystonia at time of surgery, and <30% improvement on the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia-rating-scale (BFMDRS) after ≥6 months of continuous GPi-DBS were videotaped ON and OFF stimulation, and history, preoperative videos, brain MRI, medical records, stimulation settings, stimulation system integrity, lead location, and genetic information were obtained and reviewed by an expert panel.
RESULTS: 22 patients from 11 centres were included (8 men, 14 women; 9 generalized, 9 segmental, 3 focal, 1 bibrachial dystonia; mean (range): age 48.7 (25-72) years, disease duration 22.0 (2-40) years, DBS duration 45.5 (6-131) months). Mean BFMDRS-score was 31.7 (4-93) preoperatively and 32.3 (5-101) postoperatively. Half of the patients (n = 11) had poor lead positioning alone or in combination with other problems (combined with: other disease n = 6, functional dystonia n = 1, other problems n = 2). Other problems were disease other than isolated inherited or idiopathic dystonia (n = 5), fixed deformities (n = 2), functional dystonia (n = 3), and other causes (n = 1). Excluding patients with poor lead location from further analysis, non-isolated dystonia accounted for 45.5%, functional dystonia for 27.3%, and fixed deformities for 18.2%. In patients with true isolated dystonia, lead location was the most frequent problem.
CONCLUSION: After exclusion of lead placement and stimulation programming issues, non-isolated dystonia, functional dystonia and fixed deformities account for the majority of GPi-DBS failures in dystonia.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep brain stimulation (DBS); Dystonia; Functional dystonia; Neurodegenerative dystonia; Pseudodystonia

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28690015     DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord        ISSN: 1353-8020            Impact factor:   4.891


  11 in total

Review 1.  Arching deep brain stimulation in dystonia types.

Authors:  Han-Joon Kim; Beomseok Jeon
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  A pooled meta-analysis of GPi and STN deep brain stimulation outcomes for cervical dystonia.

Authors:  Takashi Tsuboi; Joshua K Wong; Leonardo Almeida; Christopher W Hess; Aparna Wagle Shukla; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Functional and Structural Connectivity Patterns Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Deep Brain Stimulation of the Globus Pallidus Internus for Generalized Dystonia.

Authors:  L Okromelidze; T Tsuboi; R S Eisinger; M R Burns; M Charbel; M Rana; S S Grewal; C-Q Lu; L Almeida; K D Foote; M S Okun; E H Middlebrooks
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Functional Dyskinesias following Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Report of Three Cases.

Authors:  Ricardo Maciel; Carlos Zúñiga-Ramírez; Renato P Munhoz; Mateusz Zurowski; Alfonso Fasano
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2020-12-02

5.  Rescue Levodopa/Carbidopa Intestinal Gel for Secondary Deep Brain Stimulation Failure.

Authors:  Juan Miguel Pilar Bautista; Genko Oyama; Maierdanjiang Nuermaimaiti; Satoko Sekimoto; Fuyuko Sasaki; Taku Hatano; Kenya Nishioka; Masanobu Ito; Atsushi Umemura; Yuji Ishibashi; Yasushi Shimo; Nobutaka Hattori
Journal:  J Mov Disord       Date:  2020-01-31

6.  Can Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation Rescue Borderline Dystonia? Possible Coexistence of Functional (Psychogenic) and Organic Components.

Authors:  Ryoma Morigaki; Ryosuke Miyamoto; Hideo Mure; Koji Fujita; Taku Matsuda; Yoko Yamamoto; Masahito Nakataki; Tetsuya Okahisa; Yuki Matsumoto; Kazuhisa Miyake; Nobuaki Yamamoto; Ryuji Kaji; Yasushi Takagi; Satoshi Goto
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-09-15

7.  Predicting Outcome in a Cohort of Isolated and Combined Dystonia within Probabilistic Brain Mapping.

Authors:  Carolina Soares; Martin M Reich; Francisca Costa; Florian Lange; Jonas Roothans; Carina Reis; Rui Vaz; Maria José Rosas; Jens Volkmann
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2021-09-24

8.  Factors Influencing the Surgical Decision in Dystonia Patients Referred for Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Carolina Gorodetsky; Paula Azevedo; Carolina Candeias da Silva; Alfonso Fasano
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.546

9.  KMT2B-related disorders: expansion of the phenotypic spectrum and long-term efficacy of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Laura Cif; Diane Demailly; Jean-Pierre Lin; Katy E Barwick; Mario Sa; Lucia Abela; Sony Malhotra; Wui K Chong; Dora Steel; Alba Sanchis-Juan; Adeline Ngoh; Natalie Trump; Esther Meyer; Xavier Vasques; Julia Rankin; Meredith W Allain; Carolyn D Applegate; Sanaz Attaripour Isfahani; Julien Baleine; Bettina Balint; Jennifer A Bassetti; Emma L Baple; Kailash P Bhatia; Catherine Blanchet; Lydie Burglen; Gilles Cambonie; Emilie Chan Seng; Sandra Chantot Bastaraud; Fabienne Cyprien; Christine Coubes; Vincent d'Hardemare; Asif Doja; Nathalie Dorison; Diane Doummar; Marisela E Dy-Hollins; Ellyn Farrelly; David R Fitzpatrick; Conor Fearon; Elizabeth L Fieg; Brent L Fogel; Eva B Forman; Rachel G Fox; William A Gahl; Serena Galosi; Victoria Gonzalez; Tracey D Graves; Allison Gregory; Mark Hallett; Harutomo Hasegawa; Susan J Hayflick; Ada Hamosh; Marie Hully; Sandra Jansen; Suh Young Jeong; Joel B Krier; Sidney Krystal; Kishore R Kumar; Chloé Laurencin; Hane Lee; Gaetan Lesca; Laurence Lion François; Timothy Lynch; Neil Mahant; Julian A Martinez-Agosto; Christophe Milesi; Kelly A Mills; Michel Mondain; Hugo Morales-Briceno; John R Ostergaard; Swasti Pal; Juan C Pallais; Frédérique Pavillard; Pierre-Francois Perrigault; Andrea K Petersen; Gustavo Polo; Gaetan Poulen; Tuula Rinne; Thomas Roujeau; Caleb Rogers; Agathe Roubertie; Michelle Sahagian; Elise Schaefer; Laila Selim; Richard Selway; Nutan Sharma; Rebecca Signer; Ariane G Soldatos; David A Stevenson; Fiona Stewart; Michel Tchan; Ishwar C Verma; Bert B A de Vries; Jenny L Wilson; Derek A Wong; Raghda Zaitoun; Dolly Zhen; Anna Znaczko; Russell C Dale; Claudio M de Gusmão; Jennifer Friedman; Victor S C Fung; Mary D King; Shekeeb S Mohammad; Luis Rohena; Jeff L Waugh; Camilo Toro; F Lucy Raymond; Maya Topf; Philippe Coubes; Kathleen M Gorman; Manju A Kurian
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Pallidal lead placement in dystonia: leads of non-responders are contained within an anatomical range defined by responders.

Authors:  Simone Zittel; Ute Hidding; Maria Trumpfheller; Vanessa Lupici Baltzer; Alessandro Gulberti; Miriam Schaper; Maxine Biermann; Carsten Buhmann; Andreas K Engel; Christian Gerloff; Manfred Westphal; Jana Stadler; Johannes A Köppen; Monika Pötter-Nerger; Christian K E Moll; Wolfgang Hamel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.