| Literature DB >> 32942678 |
Shereen Mowaka1,2,3, Nermeen Ashoush2,4, Mariam Tadros5, Noha El Zahar5, Bassam Ayoub1,2.
Abstract
Enhancing drug extraction from human plasma is a challenging approach that critically affects pharmacokinetic and any further clinical studies based on the drug Cmin and Cmax values. It also has a serious impact on the sensitivity and the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) value of the bio-analytical methods. An advanced liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) bio-analytical method of omarigliptin (25-1000 nM) was established in human plasma using one-step liquid-liquid extraction. Alogliptin was used as an internal standard (IS) to attain good recovery and reproducibility while reducing the effects of the matrix. Enhanced plasma extraction of omarigliptin was successfully achieved with tertiary butyl methyl ether-diethyl ether (TBME-DEE) mixture as the extracting solvent, while using acetonitrile as the diluent solvent for the IS to effectively decrease the formed emulsion. Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) of the transition pairs of m/z 399.2 to 153.0 for omarigliptin and m/z 340.2 to 116.0 for alogliptin was employed in positive Electro Spray Ionization (ESI) mode. Human plasma samples were collected after 1.5 h (tmax) of Marizev® (12.5 mg) tablets administration to healthy human volunteers showing average concentration of 292.18 nM. Validation results were all satisfactory including successful stability studies with bias below 12%. The proposed study will be valuable for ethnicity comparison studies that will be commenced on omarigliptin in Egypt by the authors in prospective study, following the FDA recommends, to evaluate possible sub-group dissimilarities that include pharmacokinetic parameters.Entities:
Keywords: LC-MS/MS; enhanced extraction; human plasma; human volunteers; omarigliptin
Year: 2020 PMID: 32942678 PMCID: PMC7570897 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25184232
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structure of omarigliptin and its full scan mass spectrum.
Figure 2Chemical structure of alogliptin (IS) and its full scan mass spectrum.
Figure 3Daughter ions mass spectra in positive Electro Spray Ionization (ESI) ion detection mode with the proposed fragments showing m/z at 153.01 for omarigliptin.
Figure 4Daughter ions mass spectra in positive ESI ion detection mode with the proposed fragments showing m/z at 116.02 for alogliptin.
Comparison between previously reported methods for omariglitpin (OTN) extraction and determination in plasma either rats’ plasma or human plasma.
| Method | Extraction | LLOQ | Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC-MS/MS | Liquid-Liquid using TBME-DEE | 25 nM (9.96 ng/mL) | Human plasma | Underlying investigation |
| LC-MS/MS | Direct precipitation using Acetonitrile | 50 ng/mL | Rats’ plasma | [ |
| LC-MS/MS | Liquid-Liquid using Ethyl acetate after pH adjustment | 2 ng/mL | Human plasma | [ |
| LC-MS/MS | Direct precipitation using Acetonitrile | 4 ng/mL | Rats’ plasma | [ |
| UPLC-UV | Liquid-Liquid using DEE | 2.5 µg/mL | Rats’ plasma | [ |
Figure 5Blank plasma sample using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
Figure 6Zero plasma sample (spiked with IS) using LC-MS/MS showing only the IS using Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) chromatogram of omarigliptin (m/z = 399.2 to 153.0) and alogliptin (IS, m/z = 340.2 to 116.0).
Figure 7Lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) plasma sample using LC-MS/MS (25 nM of Omarigliptin) using Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) chromatogram of omarigliptin (m/z = 399.2 to 153.0) and alogliptin (IS, m/z = 340.2 to 116.0).
Accuracy and precision results for OTN determination by the proposed LC-MS/MS method.
| Accuracy and Precision (n = 5, Three days) | LLOQ (25 nM) | MQC (500 nM) | HQC (800 nM) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Bias (mean, n = 5) | 15.41 | −6.30 | −1.09 |
| Average Percent Recovery | 115.41% | 93.70% | 98.91% | |
| S.D. | 14.55 | 2.01 | 3.57 | |
| % R.S.D | 12.61 | 2.14 | 3.64 | |
|
| Bias (mean, n = 5) | 10.34 | 1.49 | −0.10 |
| Average Percent Recovery | 110.34% | 101.49% | 99.90% | |
| S.D. | 15.37 | 1.90 | 1.82 | |
| % R.S.D | 13.92 | 1.87 | 1.82 | |
|
| Bias (mean, n = 5) | 13.80 | 0.98 | −0.91 |
| Average Percent Recovery | 113.80% | 100.98% | 99.09% | |
| S.D. | 9.57 | 1.83 | 2.62 | |
| % R.S.D | 8.41 | 1.81 | 2.64 | |
|
| Bias (mean, n = 15) | 13.40 | −1.30 | −1.01 |
| Average Percent Recovery | 113.40% | 98.70% | 98.99% | |
| S.D. | 13.41 | 4.02 | 2.89 | |
| % R.S.D | 11.83 | 4.07 | 2.92 | |
Figure 8Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) chromatogram of omarigliptin (m/z = 399.2 to 153.0) and alogliptin (IS, m/z = 340.2 to 116.0) in human plasma sample obtained 1.5 h after oral administration of one Marizev® tablet (12.5 mg).