Literature DB >> 32941743

Comparison of radiographical characteristics and diagnostic accuracy of intraosseous jaw lesions on panoramic radiographs and CBCT.

Wei-Yu Mao1,2,3,4, Jie Lei1,2,3,4, Li Zhen Lim5,6, Yan Gao2,3,4,7, Donald A Tyndall6, Kaiyuan Fu1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differences in imaging characteristics and the diagnostic accuracy of 225 intraosseous jaw lesions on panoramic radiographs (PAN) versus cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
METHODS: 225 sets of PAN and CBCT images with biopsy-proven histopathological diagnoses were retrospectively compared in terms of radiographic features and diagnostic accuracy. The imaging characteristics of PAN and CBCT were independently evaluated by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists who were required to answer 12 questions and provided up to three differential diagnoses with their confidence scores.
RESULTS: Odds ratios (ORs) were statistically significant for border cortication (OR = 1.521; p = .003) and border continuity (OR = 0.421; p = .001), involvement on neurovascular canals (OR = 2.424; p < .001), expansion (OR = 7.948; p < .001), cortical thinning (OR = 20.480; p < .001) as well as its destruction (OR = 25.022; p < .001) and root resorption (OR = 2.477; p < .001). Furthermore, imaging features in the posterior and mandibular regions showed better agreement than those in the anterior and maxillary regions, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the first differential diagnosis was higher on CBCT than on PAN (Observer 1:78.7 vs 64.4%; Observer 2: 78.7 vs 70.2% (p < .001)). The observers' confidence scores were also higher at CBCT interpretation compared with PAN.
CONCLUSIONS: CBCT demonstrated a greater number of imaging characteristics of intraosseous jaw lesions compared with PAN, especially in the anterior regions of both jaws and in the maxilla. Diagnostic accuracy is improved with CBCT compared to PAN, especially for lesions in the maxilla. Radiologists have greater confidence when using CBCT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone beam computed tomography; Diagnostic accuracy; Intra-osseous jaw lesion; Panoramic radiography; Radiographic characteristics

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32941743      PMCID: PMC7860957          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20200165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  28 in total

1.  A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results.

Authors:  P Mozzo; C Procacci; A Tacconi; P T Martini; I A Andreis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  On the data acquisition, image reconstruction, cone beam artifacts, and their suppression in axial MDCT and CBCT - A review.

Authors:  Xiangyang Tang; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Huiqiao Xie; Arthur E Stillman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Comparing panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: Impact on radiographic features and differential diagnoses.

Authors:  Li Zhen Lim; Ricardo J Padilla; Glenn J Reside; Donald A Tyndall
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-04-17

4.  Odontogenic keratocyst and ameloblastoma: radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Jira Kitisubkanchana; Nor Hidayah Reduwan; Sopee Poomsawat; Suchaya Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri; Chanchai Wongchuensoontorn
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 5.  Keratocystic odontogenic tumour: systematic review.

Authors:  D S MacDonald-Jankowski
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 6.  Patient movement and motion artefacts in cone beam computed tomography of the dentomaxillofacial region: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Rubens Spin-Neto; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2015-12-19

7.  Diagnostic efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography for mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Gabriele Kaeppler; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Michael Ehrenfeld; Gerson Mast
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2013-07

8.  Ameloblastoma-Clinical, radiological, and therapeutic findings.

Authors:  M Kreppel; J Zöller
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.511

Review 9.  Odontogenic keratocyst: imaging features of a benign lesion with an aggressive behaviour.

Authors:  Andrea Borghesi; Cosimo Nardi; Caterina Giannitto; Andrea Tironi; Roberto Maroldi; Francesco Di Bartolomeo; Lorenzo Preda
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-07-31

10.  Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose.

Authors:  Lillian Atsumi Simabuguro Chinem; Beatriz de Souza Vilella; Cláudia Lúcia de Pinho Maurício; Lucia Viviana Canevaro; Luiz Fernando Deluiz; Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Efficiency and Safety of Dental Implantation in the Area of Hyperdense Jaw Lesions: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Kimya Taghsimi; Andrey Vyacheslavovich Vasilyev; Valeriya Sergeevna Kuznetsova; Angelina Vladimirovna Galtsova; Varditer Agabekovna Badalyan; Igor Ivanovich Babichenko
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Oral and maxillofacial pain as the first sign of metastasis of an occult primary tumour: A fifteen-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Shan Shan; Shu Liu; Zhen-Yu Yang; Tie-Mei Wang; Zi-Tong Lin; Ying-Lian Feng; Seyiti Pakezhati; Xiao-Feng Huang; Lei Zhang; Guo-Wen Sun
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 1.534

3.  Retained dental roots of adults: A nationwide population study with panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Sanna Koskela; Miira M Vehkalahti; Anna L Suominen; Sisko Huumonen; Irja Ventä
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.160

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.