| Literature DB >> 32939478 |
Michael Yeranosian1, Rajesh Rangarajan2, Sevag Bastian3, Collin Blout2, Vikas Patel2, Brian Lee2, John Itamura2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acromioclavicular (AC) separations are commonly seen shoulder injuries. Numerous surgical reconstruction techniques have been described. In this study, we present a series of patients who underwent an anatomic reconstruction using a synthetic ligament and allograft construct.Entities:
Keywords: Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction; LockDown device; allograft construct; coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction; synthetic ligament
Year: 2020 PMID: 32939478 PMCID: PMC7479026 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.04.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JSES Int ISSN: 2666-6383
Averages of outcome measures (N = 10)
| Average | |
|---|---|
| Age, yr | 44.2 ± 14.9 |
| F/U, mo | 40.4 ± 11.1 |
| Radiographic F/U, mo | 10.3 ± 11.1 |
| DASH score | 15.5 ± 15.4 |
| SANE score | 81.8 ± 12.1 |
| VAS pain score | 2 ± 2.6 |
| SST score | 11.4 ± 1.1 |
| ASES score | 84.6 ± 17.3 |
| Constant score | 82.5 ± 11.6 |
F/U, follow-up; DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; SANE, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation; VAS, visual analog scale; SST, Simple Shoulder Test; ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.
Averages of primary vs. revision outcome measures
| Primary (n = 8) | Revision (n = 2) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, yr | 41.9 ± 15.5 | 53.5 ± 10.6 |
| F/U, mo | 41.5 ± 11.3 | 36 ± 12.7 |
| Radiographic F/U, mo | 11.6 ± 12.1 | 5 ± 4.2 |
| DASH score | 12.3 ± 15.6 | 28.3 ± 1.2 |
| SANE score | 82.9 ± 13.4 | 77.5 ± 3.5 |
| VAS pain score | 2.1 ± 2.9 | 1.5 ± 0.7 |
| SST score | 11.5 ± 1.1 | 11 ± 1.4 |
| ASES score | 83.7 ± 19.5 | 87.8 ± 3.1 |
| Constant score | 85.2 ± 10.5 | 71.5 ± 12 |
F/U, follow-up; DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; SANE, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation; VAS, visual analog scale; SST, Simple Shoulder Test; ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.