Literature DB >> 32939326

Firing up the cold tumors by targeting Vps34.

Bassam Janji1, Meriem Hasmim1, Santiago Parpal2,3, Guy Berchem4, Muhammad Zaeem Noman1.   

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy based on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 blockade is particularly effective in responding to patients with hot tumors. These tumors are characterized by the accumulation of proinflammatory cytokines and T cell infiltration. In our recent report published in Science Advances, we demonstrate that targeting the autophagy-related protein Vps34 switched cold immune desert tumors into hot inflamed immune-infiltrated tumors and enhanced the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Our study provides the preclinical rationale to set up combination immunotherapy clinical trials using selective Vps34 inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockers in melanoma and CRC.
© 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autophagy; CCL5; CXCL10; NK cells; T CD8 lymphocytes; VPS34; anti-PD-1/PD-L1; cancer immunotherapy; cold/hot tumors; colon cancer; immune landscape; melanoma; proinflammatory cytokines

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32939326      PMCID: PMC7480807          DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1809936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-based cancer immunotherapy revolution has just started and it has transformed the field of immuno-oncology and the way we used to treat cancer. During the past 10 years, treatment with ICB as single agents or in combination has shown impressive clinical benefits in diverse cancers including melanoma and colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Despite the exciting and encouraging clinical responses obtained, the majority of patients treated with anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy still show none or partial objective responses.[1] Therefore, to achieve durable tumor regression in melanoma and CRC patients, there is a strong need to design new combination immunotherapies in order to bring the benefit of ICB to a larger number of cancer patients. In cold immune desert tumors, one of the most important reasons of non-responsiveness to ICB is the complete absence or the limited presence of cytotoxic immune effectors notably T cells. It is now well established that driving cytotoxic T cells into immune cold tumors significantly improves their response to ICB. Undeniably, durable clinical responses to ICB have been observed in melanoma patients with hot immune infiltrated tumors harboring preexisting cytotoxic effector T cells. Therefore, many ongoing clinical trials in immuno-oncology are focusing on strategies making cold tumors hot, so patients can better benefit from ICB.[2] We have previously reported that hypoxia-induced autophagy in tumor cells was associated with tumor resistance to cytotoxic T lymphocyte-[3] and natural killer cells (NK)-mediated killing.[4] Additionally, we showed that targeting autophagy improved the efficacy of cancer vaccination and promoted tumor regression in melanoma.[3] We further revealed that silencing the autophagy-related protein Beclin1 decreased tumor growth by inducing a massive infiltration of NK cells through the release of CCL5/RANTES by melanoma cells.[5] However, the effect of targeting autophagy on the tumor immune landscape and its impact on the therapeutic benefit of ICB is still poorly explored.[6,7] Vacuolar protein sorting 34 (Vps34), also known as class III phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PIK3C3) is involved in the initiation of autophagy and in the process of endocytosis.[8] We first assessed the impact of targeting Vps34 (both genetically and pharmacologically) on tumor growth and tumor weight in different cancer models. Genetic targeting or pharmacological inhibition of Vps34 kinase activity using two Vps34 inhibitors (Vps34i) SB02024 and SAR405 significantly decreased tumor growth, tumor weight, and improved mice survival in B16-F10 melanoma, CT26 colorectal cancer, Renca renal cell carcinoma, and genetically engineered melanoma mouse (GEMM) tumors-bearing mice. We next investigated whether Vps34-dependent inhibition of tumor growth was associated with a modulation of the tumor immune landscape. We observed an increased infiltration of major immune effector cells (NK, CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, DC and M1 macrophages) in Vps34i-treated B16-F10 and CT26 tumors as compared to vehicle-treated control tumors. By using immunocompromised NOD SCID Gamma (NSG) mice or immunocompetent mice depleted for NK or CD8+ cells, we demonstrated that both NK and CD8+ T effector cells are the major immune cells controlling the growth of Vps34-targeted B16-F10 tumors.[9] We next evaluated the expression of several proinflammatory chemokines/cytokines involved in the recruitment of CD8+ T cells into human melanomas.[10] Our data indicated that Vps34 inhibition induced the secretion of proinflammatory CCL5, CXCL10, and IFNγ within the tumor microenvironment, most likely generated by melanoma and CRC tumor cells. In addition, antibodies blocking CCL5 in Vps34i-treated B16-F10 and CT26 tumor-bearing mice significantly rescued the inhibition of tumor growth and weight and prevented infiltration of NK and CD8+ into the tumor bed. Based on these data, we concluded that targeting Vps34 induces CCL5 and CXCL10 in tumor cells, which subsequently attract more NK and CD8+ T cells and reprogram cold immune desert into hot inflamed immune infiltrated melanoma and CRC tumors. Mechanistically, we reported that pharmacological inhibition of Vps34 by SB02024 or SAR405 induced both STAT1 and IRF7 which independently upregulate the proinflammatory cytokines CCL5 and CXCL10 (Figure 1). We next evaluated whether Vps34i could improve the response to anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 in terms of tumor growth, tumor weight, and mice survival. Interestingly, combining Vps34i with either anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 significantly improved their therapeutic benefit as compared to anti-PD-L1 or PD-1 monotherapy, in both B16-F10 and CT26 tumor models.[9]
Figure 1.

Vps34 inhibition improves anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy by switching cold into hot tumors. Cold tumors are characterized by the absence of immune cells or the limited number of cytotoxic immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Therefore, cold tumors are not eligible or most likely not responding to immunotherapy (1). Treatment of cold tumors with Vps34 inhibitors (2) induces the release by tumor cells of proinflammatory chemokines such as CCL5 and CXCL10. These chemokines drives more NK and CD8 T cells to the tumor microenvironment. Vps34i-treated tumors become hot and therefore eligible to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 based immunotherapy (3). Combined Vps34i with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 (4) improves the therapeutic benefit of immunotherapy and significantly decreases the tumor growth.

Vps34 inhibition improves anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy by switching cold into hot tumors. Cold tumors are characterized by the absence of immune cells or the limited number of cytotoxic immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Therefore, cold tumors are not eligible or most likely not responding to immunotherapy (1). Treatment of cold tumors with Vps34 inhibitors (2) induces the release by tumor cells of proinflammatory chemokines such as CCL5 and CXCL10. These chemokines drives more NK and CD8 T cells to the tumor microenvironment. Vps34i-treated tumors become hot and therefore eligible to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 based immunotherapy (3). Combined Vps34i with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 (4) improves the therapeutic benefit of immunotherapy and significantly decreases the tumor growth. Solid tumor microenvironment consists of not only tumor cells but also endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and diverse subsets of innate and adaptive immune cells. The influence of Vps34i on the composition, proportion, activation, or functional states of various immune populations within the tumor bed remains largely uninvestigated. Therefore, it would be interesting to carry out a deep phenotypic, functional, and metabolic characterization of different immune cells infiltrating Vps34i tumors, notably NK and CD8+ T cells. Our current study provides an innovative therapeutic approach for designing novel clinical trials using Vps34i in combination with several immune checkpoint blockers to extend their use to non-responder cancer patients.
  10 in total

1.  Autophagy Sustains Pancreatic Cancer Growth through Both Cell-Autonomous and Nonautonomous Mechanisms.

Authors:  Annan Yang; Grit Herter-Sprie; Haikuo Zhang; Elaine Y Lin; Douglas Biancur; Xiaoxu Wang; Jiehui Deng; Josephine Hai; Shenghong Yang; Kwok-Kin Wong; Alec C Kimmelman
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 39.397

2.  Blocking hypoxia-induced autophagy in tumors restores cytotoxic T-cell activity and promotes regression.

Authors:  Muhammad Zaeem Noman; Bassam Janji; Bozena Kaminska; Kris Van Moer; Sandrine Pierson; Piotr Przanowski; Stéphanie Buart; Guy Berchem; Pedro Romero; Fathia Mami-Chouaib; Salem Chouaib
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Ironing out VPS34 inhibition.

Authors:  Timothy Marsh; Jayanta Debnath
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  Chemokine expression in melanoma metastases associated with CD8+ T-cell recruitment.

Authors:  Helena Harlin; Yuru Meng; Amy C Peterson; Yuanyuan Zha; Maria Tretiakova; Craig Slingluff; Mark McKee; Thomas F Gajewski
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Combination cancer immunotherapies tailored to the tumour microenvironment.

Authors:  Mark J Smyth; Shin Foong Ngiow; Antoni Ribas; Michele W L Teng
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Granzyme B degradation by autophagy decreases tumor cell susceptibility to natural killer-mediated lysis under hypoxia.

Authors:  Joanna Baginska; Elodie Viry; Guy Berchem; Aurélie Poli; Muhammad Zaeem Noman; Kris van Moer; Sandrine Medves; Jacques Zimmer; Anaïs Oudin; Simone P Niclou; R Chris Bleackley; Ing Swie Goping; Salem Chouaib; Bassam Janji
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance.

Authors:  Paul C Tumeh; Christina L Harview; Jennifer H Yearley; I Peter Shintaku; Emma J M Taylor; Lidia Robert; Bartosz Chmielowski; Marko Spasic; Gina Henry; Voicu Ciobanu; Alisha N West; Manuel Carmona; Christine Kivork; Elizabeth Seja; Grace Cherry; Antonio J Gutierrez; Tristan R Grogan; Christine Mateus; Gorana Tomasic; John A Glaspy; Ryan O Emerson; Harlan Robins; Robert H Pierce; David A Elashoff; Caroline Robert; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Autophagy maintains tumour growth through circulating arginine.

Authors:  Laura Poillet-Perez; Xiaoqi Xie; Le Zhan; Yang Yang; Daniel W Sharp; Zhixian Sherrie Hu; Xiaoyang Su; Anurag Maganti; Cherry Jiang; Wenyun Lu; Haiyan Zheng; Marcus W Bosenberg; Janice M Mehnert; Jessie Yanxiang Guo; Edmund Lattime; Joshua D Rabinowitz; Eileen White
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Inhibition of Vps34 reprograms cold into hot inflamed tumors and improves anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.

Authors:  Muhammad Zaeem Noman; Santiago Parpal; Kris Van Moer; Malina Xiao; Yasmin Yu; Jenny Viklund; Angelo De Milito; Meriem Hasmim; Martin Andersson; Ravi K Amaravadi; Jessica Martinsson; Guy Berchem; Bassam Janji
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Targeting autophagy inhibits melanoma growth by enhancing NK cells infiltration in a CCL5-dependent manner.

Authors:  Takouhie Mgrditchian; Tsolere Arakelian; Jérôme Paggetti; Muhammad Zaeem Noman; Elodie Viry; Etienne Moussay; Kris Van Moer; Stephanie Kreis; Coralie Guerin; Stephanie Buart; Caroline Robert; Christophe Borg; Philippe Vielh; Salem Chouaib; Guy Berchem; Bassam Janji
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Radiotherapy as a tool to elicit clinically actionable signalling pathways in cancer.

Authors:  Giulia Petroni; Lewis C Cantley; Laura Santambrogio; Silvia C Formenti; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Autophagy in major human diseases.

Authors:  Daniel J Klionsky; Giulia Petroni; Ravi K Amaravadi; Eric H Baehrecke; Andrea Ballabio; Patricia Boya; José Manuel Bravo-San Pedro; Ken Cadwell; Francesco Cecconi; Augustine M K Choi; Mary E Choi; Charleen T Chu; Patrice Codogno; Maria Isabel Colombo; Ana Maria Cuervo; Vojo Deretic; Ivan Dikic; Zvulun Elazar; Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen; Gian Maria Fimia; David A Gewirtz; Douglas R Green; Malene Hansen; Marja Jäättelä; Terje Johansen; Gábor Juhász; Vassiliki Karantza; Claudine Kraft; Guido Kroemer; Nicholas T Ktistakis; Sharad Kumar; Carlos Lopez-Otin; Kay F Macleod; Frank Madeo; Jennifer Martinez; Alicia Meléndez; Noboru Mizushima; Christian Münz; Josef M Penninger; Rushika M Perera; Mauro Piacentini; Fulvio Reggiori; David C Rubinsztein; Kevin M Ryan; Junichi Sadoshima; Laura Santambrogio; Luca Scorrano; Hans-Uwe Simon; Anna Katharina Simon; Anne Simonsen; Alexandra Stolz; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Sharon A Tooze; Tamotsu Yoshimori; Junying Yuan; Zhenyu Yue; Qing Zhong; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Federico Pietrocola
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 14.012

Review 3.  Tumor microenvironment involvement in colorectal cancer progression via Wnt/β-catenin pathway: Providing understanding of the complex mechanisms of chemoresistance.

Authors:  María Belén Novoa Díaz; María Julia Martín; Claudia Gentili
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.374

4.  Targeting autophagy in disease: established and new strategies.

Authors:  Muhammed Kocak; Saba Ezazi Erdi; Guillem Jorba; Inés Maestro; Judith Farrés; Vladimir Kirkin; Ana Martinez; Ole Pless
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 13.391

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.