Nadine Dupérré1, Charlotte Francisco2, Ella Santana-Propper2, Ingi Agnarsson3,4, Greta J Binford2. 1. Technical Assistant, Department of Arachnology, Centrum für Naturkunde, Universität de Hamburg, Germany Universität de Hamburg Hamburg Germany. 2. Lewis & Clark College, 0615 SW Palatine Hill Rd. Portland, Oregon, 97219, USA Lewis & Clark College Portland United States of America. 3. University of Vermont, Department of Biology, 109 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05405-0086, USA University of Vermont Burlington United States of America. 4. Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA National Museum of Natural History Washington United States of America.
Abstract
The Caribbean biodiversity hotspot harbors vast reserves of undiscovered species. A large-scale inventory of Caribbean arachnids (CarBio) is uncovering new species across the arachnid tree of life, and allowing inference of the evolutionary history that has generated this diversity. Herein we describe ten new species of Heteroonops (Oonopidae, or goblin spiders), from Hispaniola: H. scapula sp. nov., H. jurassicus sp. nov., H. aylinalegreae sp. nov., H. verruca sp. nov., H. renebarbai sp. nov., H. yuma sp. nov., H. carlosviquezi sp. nov., H. gabrielsantosi sp. nov., H. solanllycarreroae sp. nov. and H. constanza sp. nov. The occurrence of the pantropical type species Heteroonops spinimanus (Simon, 1891) is reported and new localities are given for: H. validus (Bryant, 1948), H. vega (Platnick & Dupérré, 2009) and H. castelloides (Platnick & Dupérré, 2009). Molecular phylogenies indicate substantial genetic divergence separating these taxa. This work adds to evidence that the depth of diversity in the Caribbean biodiversity hotspot is particularly striking for tiny taxa living in leaf litter. Nadine Dupérré, Charlotte Francisco, Ella Santana-Propper, Ingi Agnarsson, Greta J. Binford.
The Caribbean biodiversity hotspot harbors vast reserves of undiscovered species. A large-scale inventory of Caribbean arachnids (CarBio) is uncovering new species across the arachnid tree of life, and allowing inference of the evolutionary history that has generated this diversity. Herein we describe ten new species of Heteroonops (Oonopidae, or goblin spiders), from Hispaniola: H. scapula sp. nov., H. jurassicus sp. nov., H. aylinalegreae sp. nov., H. verruca sp. nov., H. renebarbai sp. nov., H. yuma sp. nov., H. carlosviquezi sp. nov., H. gabrielsantosi sp. nov., H. solanllycarreroae sp. nov. and H. constanza sp. nov. The occurrence of the pantropical type species Heteroonops spinimanus (Simon, 1891) is reported and new localities are given for: H. validus (Bryant, 1948), H. vega (Platnick & Dupérré, 2009) and H. castelloides (Platnick & Dupérré, 2009). Molecular phylogenies indicate substantial genetic divergence separating these taxa. This work adds to evidence that the depth of diversity in the Caribbean biodiversity hotspot is particularly striking for tiny taxa living in leaf litter. Nadine Dupérré, Charlotte Francisco, Ella Santana-Propper, Ingi Agnarsson, Greta J. Binford.
The Greater Antilles islands form the most species-rich landmasses in the Caribbean biodiversity hotspot. These islands serve as exceptional systems for studies of species formation and biogeography (Ricklefs and Bermingham 2008). Our ongoing large-scale inventory of Caribbean arachnids (CarBio) is rapidly uncovering new species across the arachnid tree of life and offering new insight into Caribbean biogeography (e.g., Dziki et al. 2015; Agnarsson et al. 2018; Chamberland et al. 2018; Čandek et al. 2019; Tong et al. 2019; Čandek et al. 2020). Yet the biodiversity of many of these islands, including Hispaniola, remains poorly known, especially with respect to tiny cryptic arthropods, such as oonopid spiders. The family currently includes 1846 species distributed in 113 genera, making it the 8th largest spider family (World Spider Catalog 2020). In 2006, the Planetary Biodiversity Inventory (PBI, 2020) project on was launched. At the time only 459 species of were known (PBI, 2020). In eleven years, the PBI project led to the discovery and descriptions of nearly 1300 new oonopid species, increasing our knowledge of the fauna by 300%. Yet, new species continue to be discovered as new areas are more thoroughly sampled, such as during the ongoing Caribbean arachnid biodiversity inventory (project CarBio).are small (1.0–5.0 mm) yellow, orange to bright red haplogyne spiders. Most members of this family are found living in leaf litter, but some live in canopies (Fannes et al. 2008, Platnick and Dupérré 2011b) or caves (Chamberlin and Ivie 1938), and some are termite nest inquilines (Benoit 1964) or even ant-mimics (Fannes and Jocqué 2008; Platnick and Dupérré 2011b). Oonopids typically have six large contiguous eyes (Ubick 2005), but some species have only two (Platnick 2000), or lack eyes altogether (Chamberlin and Ivie 1938; Benoit 1964; Baehr and Ubick 2010). Oonopids show other striking morphological features, including some with elongated carapace prongs (Abrahim et al. 2012), clypeal prongs (Platnick and Dupérré 2011a) and various cheliceral and endite modifications (e.g., Kranz-Baltensperger 2012; Tong et al. 2018). But an even more peculiar morphological feature is the occurrence of male palpal asymmetry, extremely rare in spiders (Huber et al. 2007), but found in oonopid genera such as , (Platnick and Dupérré 2009, 2011c). In the left and right male palps are so different that if observed independently, even experienced taxonomists would consider them to belong to distinct species (Platnick and Dupérré 2011c).Platnick and Dupérré (2009) revised the genus , including 14 species, of which 10 were new. The type species of the genus, (Simon, 1892), is pantropical, while the remainder of the group has a circum-Caribbean distribution, occurring from Mexico to Dominica (Platnick and Dupérré 2009). In 2009, four species were known to occur in Dominican Republic: (Platnick & Dupérré, 2009), (Platnick & Dupérré, 2009), (Bryant, 1948) and (Platnick & Dupérré, 2009). Here we describe ten new species and report for the first time the presence of the pantropical genotype, , as well as new localities for , and . We demonstrate substantial genetic divergence between these species and analyze biogeographic patterns within Hispaniola using mitochondrial phylogenies.
Material and methods
Collections examined
All 66 specimens examined are from the 2012 CarBio expedition to Dominican Republic, unless otherwise noted. They were all found in leaf litter samples that were sifted in the field and either hand sorted, or extracted through Berlese funnels. Specimens are stored at the Natural History Museum in Vermont, USA (UVM); type specimens are deposited at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, USA (NMNH, USNMENT). Specimens were roughly sorted in-field and stored in 95% ethanol at -20 °C upon return to the laboratory. Species determination was done through morphological assessment, followed by molecular phylogenetic analyses. Genetic divergences guided further morphological assessment and final species delineation.
Morphological assessment
Specimens were collected and examined in 95% ethanol under a SMZ-U Nikon dissection microscope. A Nikon Coolpix 950 digital camera attached to the microscope was used to photograph all the structures to be illustrated. The digital photos were used to trace proportions and the illustrations were detailed and shaded by referring back to the structure under the microscope. Female genitalia were excised using a sharp entomological needle and submerged in lactic acid to clear internal structures. The structures were photographed and illustrated as explained above. All measurements are in millimeters. For complete morphological description of the genus see Platnick and Dupérré (2009: 17–21). Nomenclatural morphology follows Platnick and Dupérré (2009).
Molecular analyses
DNA extraction was done with the QIAGEN DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA). We sequenced fragments of the mitochondrial Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) and 16S ribosomal RNA (16S), which are typically effective phylogenetic markers at low taxonomic levels for spiders. We amplified COI with LCO1490-2776 and 16S with 16SF and 16SR using standard protocols (see e.g., Agnarsson et al. 2007). PCR products were sequenced at the University of Arizona, Beckman Genomics, or the Smithsonian Institution. Sequences were interpreted from chromatograms using Phred and Phrap (Green and Ewing 2002, Green 2009) within the Chromaseq module (Maddison and Maddison 2020) in Mesquite 3.61 (Maddison and Maddison 2019), with default parameters. The sequences were then proofread by examining chromatograms by eye.The taxon sampling in our final dataset included mitochondrial sequences for 37 of 38 from the Dominican Republic in our dataset (Table 1). We obtained COI data for all 37 of these specimens, and 16S for 32 of 37. Neither CO1 nor 16S amplified from the single representative of sp. nov. The concatenated alignment is 1114 nucleotides.
Table 1.
Species (ND 17)
sex
type?
Locality
Latitude / Longitude
elev m
CO1
16s
GenBank Label
Specimen Name
H.spinimanus
f
DR Beach trail to Cueva del Puente, Parque Nacional del Este
18.32902N, 068.80995W
0
MT636140
MT635438
H._spinimanus_f
H. spin 01-1
H.verruca sp. nov.
m
holotype
DR Cachote Biosphere Reserve
18.09786N, 071.18925W
1200
MT636136
MT635434
H._verruca_n_sp_m1
H. verr 37-1
f
paratype
DR Cachote Biosphere Reserve
18.09786N, 071.18925W
1200
MT636137
MT635435
H._verruca_n_sp_f1
H. verr 37-2
m
DR Cachote Biosphere Reserve
18.09786N, 071.18925W
1200
MT636139
MT635437
H._verruca_n_sp_m2
H. verr 37-3
m
DR Cachote Biosphere Reserve
18.09786N, 071.18925W
1200
MT636138
MT635436
H._verruca_n_sp_m3
H. verr 37-4
H.validus
m
DR Inside cueva del puente, Parque Nacional del Este
18.3816N, 068.8017W
25
MT636112
MT635415
H._validus_m1
H. val 02-1
f
DR Inside cueva del puente, Parque Nacional del Este
18.3816N, 068.8017W
25
MT636113
H._validus_f1
H. val 02-2
f
DR Inside cueva del puente, Parque Nacional del Este
18.3816N, 068.8017W
25
MT636114
MT635416
H._validus_f2
H. val 02-3
m
DR Inside cueva del puente, Parque Nacional del Este
18.3816N, 068.8017W
25
MT636115
H._validus_m2
H. val 02-4
m
DR Inside cueva del puente, Parque Nacional del Este
18.3816N, 068.8017W
25
MT636116
H._validus_m3
H. val 02-5
H.carlosviquezi sp. nov.
f
holotype
DR Loma Quita Espuela
19.34405N, 069.46635W
200
MT636111
MT635414
H._carlosviquezi_n_sp_f
7B11-2
H.castelloides
m
DR Loma Quita Espuela
19.34405N, 069.46635W
200
MT636124
MT635423
H._castelloides_m
H. cast 11-1
H.vega
m
DR Loma Quita Espuela
19.34405N, 069.46635W
200
MT636123
H._vega_m
H. veg 11-3
H.yuma sp. nov.
f
holotype
DR Loma Quita Espuela
19.34405N, 069.46635W
200
MT636122
MT635422
H._yuma_n_sp_f1
H. veg 11-1
f
paratype
DR Loma Quita Espuela
19.34405N, 069.46635W
200
MT636121
MT635421
H._yuma_n_sp_f2
H. veg 11-2
H.aylinalegreae sp. nov.
m
DR Los Haitises: Cueva la Arena
19.08013N, 069.4649W
17
MT636132
MT635430
H._aylinalegreae_n_sp_m3
H. five 07-1
H.renebarbai sp. nov.
m
holotype
DR Los Haitises: Cueva la Arena
19.08013N, 069.4649W
17
MT636110
MT635413
H._renebarbai_n_sp_m
H. six 07-1
H.aylinalegreae sp. nov.
m
holotype
DR Parque del Este
18.355536N, 068.61825W
46
MT636128
MT635427
H._aylinalegreae_n_sp_m1
H. five 03-1
f
DR Parque del Este
18.355536N, 068.61825W
46
MT645158
H._aylinalegreae_n_sp_f3
H. five 03-2
f
DR Parque del Este
18.355536N, 068.61825W
46
MT636131
MT635429
H._aylinalegreae_n_sp_f1
H. five 03-3
f
DR Parque del Este
18.355536N, 068.61825W
46
MT636129
H._aylinalegreae_n_sp_f2
H. five 03-4
m
DR Parque del Este
18.355536N, 068.61825W
46
MT636130
MT635428
H._aylinalegreae_n_sp_m2
H. five 03-5
H.constanza sp. nov.
m
holotype
DR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park)
18.688N, 070.596W
2100
MT636125
MT635424
H._constanza_n_sp_m
H. cast 24-1
f
paratype
DR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park)
18.688N, 070.596W
2100
MT636126
MT635425
H._constanza_n_sp_f1
H. cast 24-2
f
paratype
DR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park)
18.688N, 070.596W
2100
MT636127
MT635426
H._constanza_n_sp_f2
H. cast 24-3
H.gabrielsantosi sp. nov.
f
paratype
DR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park)
18.688N, 070.596W
2100
MT636133
MT635431
H._gabrielsantosi_n_sp_f2
H. one 24-1
f
holotype
DR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park)
18.688N, 070.596W
2100
MT636135
MT635433
H._gabrielsantosi_n_sp_f1
H. one 24-2
f
paratype
DR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park)
18.688N, 070.596W
2100
MT636134
MT635432
H._gabrielsantosi_n_sp_f3
H. one 24-3
H.jurassicus sp. nov.
m
DR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park)
18.688N, 070.596W
2100
MT636117
MT635417
H._jurassicus_n_sp_m1
H. jur 24-1
m
DR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park)
18.688N, 070.596W
2100
MT636120
MT635420
H._jurassicus_n_sp_m2
H. jur 24-3
f
DR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park)
18.688N, 070.596W
2100
MT636118
MT635418
H._ jurassicus_n_sp_f1
H. jur 24-4
f
DR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park)
18.688N, 070.596W
2100
MT636119
MT635419
H._ jurassicus_n_sp_f2
H. jur 24-5
H.scapula sp. nov.
f
paratype
DR Valle Nuevo Rd
18.84633N, 070.74064W
2983
MT636109
MT635412
H._ scapula_n_sp_f
H. two 22-2
m
holotype
DR Valle Nuevo, NP; Valle Nuevo Rd
18.84633N, 070.74064W
2983
MT636108
H._scapula_n_sp_m
H. two 22-1
Oonopidae sp 1
f
DR Los Haitises: Cueva la Arena
19.08013N, 069.4649W
17
MT636142
MT635440
Oonopidae_sp_1_DR_f
H. six 07-2
Oonopidae sp 2
f
PR Mona Island: Bajuga Empalme
MT636141
MT635439
Oonopidae_sp_2_Mona_f
H. mona 1
00392858 Stenoonopsportoricensis
f
PR Ranger Station, Guanica Dry Forest
17.971472N, 066.86795W
154
MT636143
00392858_S._portoricensis
For phylogenetic analyses, alignments were done in MAFFT (Katoh 2013) through the online portal EMBL-EBI, using default settings but increasing the tree rebuilding and maxiterate settings to 100. Gaps were treated as missing characters. The aligned sequences for COI, and 16S, were tested for the best fitting substitution model using the program Jmodeltest 2.1.7 (Darriba et al. 2012). The best models for each gene, among the 24 models available in MrBayes, were GTR+G for 16S and GTR+I+G for COI. We conducted Bayesian analyses using MrBayes V3.2.3 through the online portal CIPRES (Miller et al. 2010) on the concatenated mtDNA dataset. The Bayesian analyses ran 10,000,000 generations, sampling every 1000 generations. We used Tracer (Drummond and Rambaut 2007) to verify proper convergence of runs and sufficient sampling of priors.
The ten new species of presented in this work are genetically distinct and distinguishable morphologically. They were all collected in leaf litter samples from forest or cave habitats in Hispaniola ranging from near sea level to 2983 m. Mitochondrial genetic divergences and patterns of relationships belie a deep and old history of on Hispaniola (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
Summary phylogeny of the included species rendering support for the monophyly (multiple samples per species) or exclusivity (single specimens) of each species dealt with here. Species color scheme equals that on map in Figure 40. New species are highlighted in bold. Thick branches have >95% posterior probability support, thin branches have >75% posterior probability support. Scale bar indicates the number of expected changes on branches. Inset photo of female sp. nov. For more detailed specimen-level phylogeny see Suppl. material 1.
Summary phylogeny of the included species rendering support for the monophyly (multiple samples per species) or exclusivity (single specimens) of each species dealt with here. Species color scheme equals that on map in Figure 40. New species are highlighted in bold. Thick branches have >95% posterior probability support, thin branches have >75% posterior probability support. Scale bar indicates the number of expected changes on branches. Inset photo of female sp. nov. For more detailed specimen-level phylogeny see Suppl. material 1.
Figure 40.
Distribution map of all species found in Hispaniola.
Mexico, Costa Rica, Bahama Islands, Cuba, Jamaica, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Saba, Montserrat and Dominica ( (Simon, 1891) presents a pantropical distribution).
Diagnosis.
Males are easily diagnosed from all other by the presence of one or two backward-pointing projections on the male palpal endites (Figs 29–33). Females are easily diagnosed by their elongated, spinose pedipalpi (Platnick and Dupérré 2009, fig. 181).
Male holotype from Dominican Republic, La Vega Province, Constanza, Valle Nuevo National Park, , 2983 m, 26.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747000). One female paratype, same data.
Etymology.
The specific epithet is a noun in apposition meaning wings, in reference to the large wing-like structures of the female internal genitalia.Males are diagnosed from all species by the combination of the following characters: constricted tip of palpal bulb and their bent embolus, wider apically, long conductor reaching the tip of the embolus (Figs 2, 3); females are diagnosed by the large, anterior wing-like projections of their internal genitalia and triangular anterior receptaculum (Fig. 5).
Description.
Male (holotype): Total length: 1.9; carapace length: 1.0; carapace width: 0.7. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, bright orange; pars cephalica flat. Sternum yellow; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites yellow with one elongated and thin apical backward-pointing projection (Fig. 34); labium light yellow. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval, PME squared; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; light gray covered dorsally with long dark setae; epigastric and postepigastric scuta light orange, well sclerotized. : Yellow; tibia I with five pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with 2 pairs of ventral spines; leg formula undetermined, missing legs II-III-IV. : Palpal segments light yellow; palpal bulb whitish. Palpal femur, patella and tibia with spines prolaterally (Fig. 2). Palpal bulb ovoid constricted at tip (Fig. 2); embolus long, bent medially, wider apically; conductor elongated and thin, wider apically, reaching the tip of the embolus (Fig. 3).Female (paratype): Total length: 1.98; carapace length: 0.94; carapace width: 0.74. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, bright orange; pars cephalica flat. Sternum, labium and chelicerae: as in male. Endites without projection. : Same as male. : Oval; gray; epigastric and postepigastric scuta orange, well sclerotized (Fig. 4). : Color as in male; all legs missing; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding, with large structure visible through the epigastric scutum (Fig. 4). Internal genitalia with triangular anterior receptaculum, projecting posteriorly into a plate-like extrusion; posterior receptaculum not observed; wing-like projections well sclerotized, tridimensional (Fig. 5).sp. nov. Male (2, 3), female (4, 5). 2 Palp, prolateral view 3 palp, apical view 4 epigynal region, ventral view 5 internal genitalia dorsal view.
Other material examined.
None.Dominican Republic, La Vega Province (Fig. 40).Dupérré
sp. nov.CF69ED80-E608-58EF-8E6D-A815545DF104http://zoobank.org/F8D0A1A4-B6CF-438F-BADD-7C5FCAAA995BFigs 6–9
, 35
, 40
Male holotype from Dominican Republic, La Vega Province, Constanza, Valle Nuevo National Park, ‘Jurassic Park’, , 2100 m, 26.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747001). Two female paratypes, same data.The specific epithet is a noun in apposition taken from the type locality, Jurassic Park, Dominican Republic.Males are distinguished from all species of the genera by the spatula-shaped tip of the embolus (Fig. 7). Females are distinguished by their large funnel-shaped anterior receptaculum (Fig. 9).Male (holotype): Total length: 1.93; carapace length: 1.03; carapace width: 0.96. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, bright orange; pars cephalica slightly elevated. Sternum orange; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites orange with one very small apical backward-pointing projection (Fig. 35); labium light orange. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae orange; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs long, 2/3 the length of the chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME rectangular; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; beige dorsally covered with long dark setae; epigastric and postepigastric scuta orange, well sclerotized. : Orange; tibia I with five pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with two pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123. : Palpal segments yellow; palpal bulb whitish. Palpal patella, tibia and tarsus with spines prolaterally (Fig. 6). Palpal bulb ovoid slightly constricted at tip (Fig. 6); embolus long, bent medially with transparent spatula-shaped tip; conductor long and thin reaching the tip of the embolus (Fig. 7).Female (paratype): Total length: 2.12; carapace length: 0.92; carapace width: 0.76. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, yellow; pars cephalica flat. Sternum and labium light yellow. Chelicerae and endites light yellow, not modified. : as in male. : Oval, light beige; epigastric and postepigastric scuta orange, well sclerotized (Fig. 8). : Light yellow; tibia I with five pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with two pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding, with funnel-shaped and rectangular structures visible through the epigastric scutum (Fig. 8). Internal genitalia with funnel-shaped anterior receptaculum; posterior receptaculum not observed; wing-like projections well sclerotized, tridimensional (Fig. 9)sp. nov. Male (6, 7), female (8, 9). 6 Palp, prolateral view 7 palp, apical view 8 epigynal region, ventral view 9 internal genitalia, dorsal view.Same data as type specimens: 1♂ (USNMENT 00788060), 1♂ (USNMENT 00788048), 1♀ (USNMENT 00788084); 3♂, 4♀ (UVM).Dominican Republic, La Vega Province (Fig. 40).Dupérré
sp. nov.92425C20-8C32-56DB-A678-BAE3CC81B417http://zoobank.org/EBB74055-FC21-4252-AD4C-F4628928F811Figs 10–13
, 36
, 40
Male holotype from Dominican Republic, La Alta Gracia Province, Occidental, San Rafael, del Este National Park, , 46 m, 7–8.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747002). One male and four female paratypes, same data (USNMENT 01747003).The specific epithet is a noun in apposition honoring local arachnologist and CarBio collaborator Aylin Alegre.Males are diagnosed from all by the combination of the following characters: embolus well sclerotized, not spatulated apically; short conductor not reaching the tip of the embolus (Fig. 11); females are diagnosed by their inverse triangular anterior receptaculum and large posterior receptaculum (Fig. 13).Male (holotype): Total length: 1.65; carapace length: 0.79; carapace width: 0.67. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, light yellow; pars cephalica flat. Sternum light yellow; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites light yellow with one small apical backward-pointing projection (Fig. 35); labium light yellow. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME squared; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; light gray, dorsally covered with long dark setae; epigastric and postepigastric scuta light yellow, not well sclerotized. : Femora whitish; other legs segments light yellow; tibia I with one pair of ventral spines, metatarsus I with two pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123. : Palpal segments yellow; palpal bulb whitish. Palpal patella, tibia and tarsus with spines prolaterally (Fig. 10). Palpal bulb ovoid slightly constricted at tip (Fig. 10); embolus well sclerotized, curved with pointed tip; conductor short and pointed not reaching tip of the embolus (Fig. 11).Female (paratype): Total length: 1.89; carapace length: 0.81; carapace width: 0.67. : Carapace, sternum, labium and chelicerae: as in male. Endites without projection. : Same as male. : Oval; light gray; epigastric and postepigastric light yellow, not well sclerotized (Fig. 12). : Color as in male; tibia I with three pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with two pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding, with tulip-shaped structure visible through the epigastric scutum (Fig. 12). Internal genitalia with inverted triangular anterior receptaculum; posterior receptaculum large, pouch-shaped, wrinkled with pore field; wing-like projections short (Fig. 13).sp. nov. Male (10, 11), female (12, 13). 10 Palp, prolateral view 11 palp, apical view 12 epigynal region, ventral view 13 internal genitalia, dorsal view.1♂ Dominican Republic, Hato Mayor Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, Parque Nacional los Haitises, Cueva La Arena, , 17♂, 12.vi.2012, team CarBio (UVM); 1♂3♀ Dominican Republic, La Alta Gracia Province, Occidental, San Rafael, del Este National Park, , 46 m, 7–8.vi.2012, team CarBio (UVM).Dominican Republic, La Alta Gracia and Hato Mayor provinces (Fig. 40).Dupérré
sp. nov.DE2A5A9C-39DD-523D-A860-59AE4CE9A393http://zoobank.org/18B6E9E1-0B6C-45C8-B724-85C0A3279651Figs 14–18
, 37
, 40
Male holotype from Dominican Republic, Barahona Province, Cachote Biosphere Reserve, , 1200 m, 7.vii.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747004). One female paratype, same data.The specific epithet is a noun in apposition meaning wart in reference to the male palpal bulb bearing a wart-like projection.Males can be diagnosed from all species by the wart-like projection on the prolateral side of the bulb (Fig. 14); females can be diagnosed by their small heart-shaped posterior receptaculum (Fig. 18).Male (holotype): Total length: 1.9; carapace length: 0.95; carapace width: 0.79. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, bright yellow; pars cephalica flat. Sternum yellow; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites yellow with one large, median backward-pointing projection (Fig. 37); labium yellow. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 the length of the chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME rectangular; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; light beige covered dorsally with long dark setae; epigastric and postepigastric scuta light yellow, well sclerotized. : Femora with basal half whitish, apical half-light yellow, other legs segments light yellow; tibia I with three pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with two pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123. : Palpal segments yellow; palpal bulb whitish. Palpal patella and tibia with spines prolaterally (Fig. 14). Palpal bulb ovoid with apical triangular bump and prolateral wart-like projection (Figs 13, 14); embolus and conductor set on an oval base with apical ridges (Figs 15, 16); embolus well sclerotized, wide and triangular; conductor spine-like, well sclerotized reaching the tip of the embolus (Fig. 16).Female (paratype): Total length: 2.04; carapace length: 0.98; carapace width: 0.76. : Carapace, sternum, labium and chelicerae: as in male. Endites without projection. : Same as male. : Oval, light beige; epigastric and postepigastric scuta orange, well sclerotized (Fig. 17). : Color as in male; leg I missing; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding, with small, squared structure visible through the epigastric scutum, and triangular plate visible through the epigastric furrow (Fig. 17). Internal genitalia with triangular anterior receptaculum, projecting posteriorly; posterior receptaculum small, bulbous with pore field; wing-like projections not observed (Fig. 18).sp. nov. Male (14–16), female (17, 18). 14 Palp, prolateral view 15 palp, apical view 16 palp, retrolateral view 17 epigynal region, ventral view 18 internal genitalia, dorsal view.Same data as type specimens: 2♂ (UVM).Dominican Republic, Barahona Province (Fig. 40).Dupérré
sp. nov.7808B2FC-D64F-503F-BE41-15FB8458846Chttp://zoobank.org/803999F5-7C2D-4CE6-9C83-6264977AA215Figs 19
, 20
, 38
, 40
Male holotype from Dominican Republic, Hato Mayor Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, los Haitises National Park, outside Cueva La Arena, , 17m, 12.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747005).The specific epithet is a noun in apposition honoring local arachnologist and CarBio collaborator René Barba.Males are distinguished from most species by their elongated, thin embolus (Fig. 19); from by their long and pointed conductor (Fig. 20), flat and with denticles in the later (Platnick and Dupérré 2009, fig. 194).Male (holotype): Total length: 1.34; carapace length: 0.71; carapace width: 0.59. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, light yellow; pars cephalica flat. Sternum light yellow; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites light yellow with an elongated apical backward-pointing projection with rounded tip (Fig. 38); labium light yellow. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME squared; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; light beige covered dorsally with long dark setae; epigastric and postepigastric scuta light yellow, not well sclerotized. : Light yellow; tibia I with two pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with one pair of ventral spines; leg formula undertermined, legs II-III-IV missing. : Palpal segments light yellow; palpal bulb whitish. Palpal femur, patella and tibia with spines prolaterally (Fig. 19). Palpal bulb ovoid (Fig. 19); embolus well sclerotized, long and thin; conductor long and pointed, initiating at base of embolus (Figs 19, 20).sp. nov. Male. 19 Palp, prolateral view 20 palp, apical view.Female: Unknown.None.Dominican Republic, Hato Mayor Province (Fig. 40).Dupérré
sp. nov.2099344E-63AD-5A78-ACB4-B6F08F9C2142http://zoobank.org/C9159DF2-1A78-4434-BA1E-65A51DD10D33Figs 21
, 22
, 40
Female holotype from Dominican Republic, Duarte Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, Loma Quita Espuela, , 200 m, 14.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747006). Female paratype, same data (USNMENT 01747007).The specific name is noun in apposition taken from the type locality, San Rafael de Yuma, Dominican Republic.Females are distinguished from most species by the anterior receptaculum positioned on a narrow, short stalk; from by their larger anterior receptaculum projecting posteriorly (Fig. 22), not projecting in the later species (Platnick and Dupérré 2009, fig. 211).Female (holotype) Total length: 1.86; carapace length: 0.76; carapace width: 0.61. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, whitish; pars cephalica flat. Sternum whitish; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites withish, not modified; labium light whitish. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae pale yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME squared; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; yellowish; epigastric and postepigastric scuta pale yellow, not well sclerotized (Fig. 21). : whitish; tibia I with four pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with three pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding with faint structure visible through the scuta (Fig. 21). Internal genitalia with triangular anterior receptaculum, projecting posteriorly (Fig. 22); posterior receptaculum transparent, W-shaped; wing-like projections golf club-shaped (Fig. 22).sp. nov. Female. 21 Epigynal region, ventral view 22 internal genitalia, dorsal view.Male: Unknown.None.Dominican Republic, Duarte Province (Fig. 40).Dupérré
sp. nov.E89446B4-8D50-5470-9678-367D5BE422B5http://zoobank.org/9192A67A-94FD-4CE5-852B-AE9586764724Figs 23–25
, 40
Female holotype from Dominican Republic, Duarte Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, Loma Quita Espuela, , 200 m, 14.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747008).The specific epithet is a noun in apposition honoring Costa Rican arachnologist and CarBio collaborator Carlos Viquez.Females are easily diagnosed by their umbrella-shaped anterior receptaculum (Fig. 24).Female: Total length: 2.06; carapace length: 0.96; carapace width: 0.8. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, light orange; pars cephalica flat. Sternum yellow; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites yellow, not modified; labium light yellow. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME squared; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; dark grayish-blue with pattern, apically whitish (Fig. 25); epigastric and postepigastric scuta light orange, well sclerotized (Fig. 23). : Orange; tibia I with four pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with three pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding, with bell-shaped structure visible through the epigastric scutum (Fig. 23). Internal genitalia with umbrella-shaped anterior receptaculum; posterior receptaculum globose with large pore field; wing-like projections large, ear-shaped (Fig. 24).Male: Unknown.None.Dominican Republic, Duarte Province (Fig. 40).Dupérré
sp. nov.8E94F832-848A-5967-B350-14A80DE0D75Ehttp://zoobank.org/33CC4CA3-3B84-43A9-978D-CF5391CEFEACFigs 26
, 27
, 40Female holotype from Dominican Republic, La Vega Province, Constanza, Valle Nuevo National Park, ‘Jurassic Park’, , 2100 m, 26.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747009). Two female paratypes (USNMENT 01747010, 01747011), same data.The specific epithet is a noun in apposition honoring local arachnologist and CarBio collaborator Gabriel Santos.Females can be diagnosed from all species by the arch wing-like projections of the internal genitalia and large oval posterior receptaculum (Fig. 27).Female: Total length: 2.31; carapace length: 0.91; carapace width: 0.84. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, light yellow; pars cephalica flat. Sternum light yellow; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites light yellow, not modified; labium light yellow. Clypeus vertical, short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae light yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME squared; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; whitish covered dorsally with long dark setae; epigastric and postepigastric scuta light orange, well sclerotized (Fig. 26). : Femora with basal half whitish, apical half, light yellow; other leg segments light yellow; tibia I with four pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with three pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding, with crcifix-shaped structure visible through the scutum and the epigastric furrow (Fig. 26). Internal genitalia with triangular anterior receptaculum, projecting posteriorly; posterior receptaculum elongated oval, with large pore field; wing-like projections arched (Fig. 27).sp. nov., female (23–25). sp. nov., female (27). 23 Epigynal region, ventral view 24 internal genitalia, dorsal view 25 abdomen, dorsal view 26 epigynal region, ventral view 27 internal genitalia, dorsal view.Male: Unknown.None.Dominican Republic, La Vega Province (Fig. 40).Dupérré
sp. nov.3D640485-4E00-5372-BD6C-39302506D195http://zoobank.org/F190F990-F3D6-4881-B509-382DE2BEA50CFigs 28
, 29
, 40Female holotype from Dominican Republic, Duarte Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, Loma Quita Espuela, , 200 m, 14.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747012).The specific epithet is a noun in apposition honoring local arachnologist and CarBio collaborator Solanlly Carrrero.Females are diagnosed from all species by their posteriorly protruding epigastric scutum and their oval posterior receptaculum with folded bag-like extension (Fig. 29).Female (holotype). Total length: 1.37; carapace length: 0.61; carapace width: 0.42. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, whitish; pars cephalica flat. Sternum whitish; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites whitish, not modified; labium whitish. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae whitish; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME squared; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; light gray covered dorsally with long dark setae; epigastric scutum protruding, postepigastric scutum thin; scuta light yellow, not well sclerotized (Fig. 28). : Whitish; tibia I with three pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with two pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region protruding ventrally (not visible on image) with anchor-shaped structure visible through the epigastric scutum and epigastric furrow (Fig. 28). Internal genitalia with hat-shaped anterior receptaculum; posterior receptaculum oval with small pore field region and folded bag-like extension; wing-like projections anvil-shaped (Fig. 29).sp. nov.. Female. 28 Epigynal region, ventral view 29 internal genitalia, dorsal view.Male: Unknown.None.Dominican Republic, La Duarte Province (Fig. 40).Dupérré
sp. nov.A0EE1E54-3663-5884-AA76-1614129215C8http://zoobank.org/C1FAE1A8-EA65-4320-8419-A24E63086580Figs 30–33
, 39
, 40Male holotype from Dominican Republic, La Vega Province, Constanza, Valle Nuevo National Park, ‘Jurassic Park’, , 2100 m, 26.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747013). Two female paratypes (USNMENT 01747014), same data.The specific name is noun in apposition taken from the type locality, Constanza Province, Dominican Republic.Both males and females closely resemble Platnick & Dupérré, 2009; males are distinguished by the narrow, elongated palpal bulb and palpal tibia 2× longer than patellae (Fig. 30), ovoid in the later species, and palpal tibia 1.5× longer than patellae (Platnick and Dupérré 2009, fig. 242); females are distinguished by their anterior recepetaculum with four branches (Fig. 33), five in (Platnick and Dupérré 2009, fig. 259).Male (holotype): Total length: 1.79; carapace length: 0.86; carapace width: 0.72. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, pale yellow; pars cephalica slightly elevated. Sternum pale yellow; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites pale yellow, with small apical projection (Fig. 39); labium light yellow. Clypeus sligthly protruding; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME rounded; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; beige covered dorsally with long setae; epigastric and postepigastric scuta inconspicuous. : Legs missing. : Palpal segments pale yellow; palpal bulb whitish. Palpal femora, tibia and tarsus with spines prolaterally (Fig. 30). Palpal bulb elongated (Fig. 30); embolus strongly bent, pointed apically; conductor long and thin reaching the tip of the embolus (Fig. 31).Female (paratype): Total length: 2.09; carapace length: 0.85; carapace width: 0.72. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, yellow; pars cephalica flat. Sternum and labium light yellow. Chelicerae and endites light yellow, not modified. : as in male. : Oval, light beige; epigastric and postepigastric scuta pale yellow, not well sclerotized (Fig. 32). : Legs missing; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding, with tree-shaped structures slightly visible through the epigastric scutum (Fig. 32). Internal genitalia with anterior receptaculum elongated with four main branches; posterior receptaculum triangular well sclerotized; wing-like projections elongated and narrow (Fig. 33).sp. nov. Male (30, 31), female (32, 33). 30 Palp, prolateral view 31 palp, apical view 32 epigynal region, ventral view 33 internal genitalia, dorsal view.None.Male endites, ventral view. 34 sp. nov. 35 sp. nov. 36 sp. nov. 37 sp. nov. 38 sp. nov. 39 sp. nov.Dominican Republic, La Vega Province (Fig. 40).Distribution map of all species found in Hispaniola.
Dominican Republic, La Alta Gracia Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, del Este National Park, beach Trail to Cueva del Puente, , 0 m, 5.vi.2012, team CarBio,1♀ (UVM).Platnick & Dupérré, 200910301FC4-03CD-5822-A47F-E395DF228073Fig. 40Dominican Republic, La Duarte Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, Loma Quita Espuela, , 200 m, 14.vi.2012, team CarBio, 1♂ (UVM).(Bryant, 1948)A0103482-1EB1-59F7-9CD3-F2A7D4A6D418Fig. 40Dominican Republic, La Alta Gracia Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, del Este National Park, Cueva del Puente, , 25 m, 6.vi.2012, team CarBio, 3♂4♀ (UVM).Platnick & Dupérré, 20096A3BF836-79F3-589A-8E15-409428D50394Fig. 40Dominican Republic, La Duarte Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, Loma Quita Espuela, , 200m, 14.vi.2012, team CarBio, 1♂ (UVM).
Discussion
Observed patterns in our data are consistent with a high probability that our sampling has only detected a small subset of the diversity in Hispaniola. First, we found a total of 66 individuals distributed in 14 species, 10 of which were new, from only eight sampling sites. At a single site in Loma Quita (200 m) we found five species including three that are new (, , ) and two that represent new records (, ). Similarly, we found three new species in one locality in a high elevation forest (2100 m) in the Cordillera Central Parque National Valle Nuevo (, , ). Moreover, a fourth new species , was discovered in the same park at higher elevation (2983 m). Taxa from both of these localities are phylogenetically widespread reflecting an old most recent common ancestor and high levels of subsequent diversification (Fig. 1)). This contrasts with patterns seen in more dispersive Caribbean spiders that rarely have more than a single species of a given genus in one locality (e.g., Dziki et al. 2015, Agnarsson et al. 2018, Čandek et al. 2019, Tong et al. 2019)Despite patterns consistent with high local diversity, there is evidence that some species are wide ranging. Two taxa that represent new records were collected far from their type localities in the Cordillera Central, , and Interestingly both of these species have been collected in flight intercept traps (Platnick and Dupérré 2009) suggesting the potential for aerial dispersal. Additionally, one species described here, , was collected in two separate low elevation localities on the northern and southern sides of Eastern Hispaniola. While it seems that some members of this genus are capable of widespread dispersal, most notably the type species, the high levels of diversity in the Dominican Republic suggest an old presence and much speciation within West Indies, consistent with biologies that are not typically dispersal prone.