Literature DB >> 32939145

Heteroonops (Araneae, Oonopidae) spiders from Hispaniola: the discovery of ten new species.

Nadine Dupérré1, Charlotte Francisco2, Ella Santana-Propper2, Ingi Agnarsson3,4, Greta J Binford2.   

Abstract

The Caribbean biodiversity hotspot harbors vast reserves of undiscovered species. A large-scale inventory of Caribbean arachnids (CarBio) is uncovering new species across the arachnid tree of life, and allowing inference of the evolutionary history that has generated this diversity. Herein we describe ten new species of Heteroonops (Oonopidae, or goblin spiders), from Hispaniola: H. scapula sp. nov., H. jurassicus sp. nov., H. aylinalegreae sp. nov., H. verruca sp. nov., H. renebarbai sp. nov., H. yuma sp. nov., H. carlosviquezi sp. nov., H. gabrielsantosi sp. nov., H. solanllycarreroae sp. nov. and H. constanza sp. nov. The occurrence of the pantropical type species Heteroonops spinimanus (Simon, 1891) is reported and new localities are given for: H. validus (Bryant, 1948), H. vega (Platnick & Dupérré, 2009) and H. castelloides (Platnick & Dupérré, 2009). Molecular phylogenies indicate substantial genetic divergence separating these taxa. This work adds to evidence that the depth of diversity in the Caribbean biodiversity hotspot is particularly striking for tiny taxa living in leaf litter. Nadine Dupérré, Charlotte Francisco, Ella Santana-Propper, Ingi Agnarsson, Greta J. Binford.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caribbean biogeography; Goblin spiders; biodiversity hotspot; molecular phylogeny

Year:  2020        PMID: 32939145      PMCID: PMC7471135          DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.964.51554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zookeys        ISSN: 1313-2970            Impact factor:   1.546


Introduction

The Greater Antilles islands form the most species-rich landmasses in the Caribbean biodiversity hotspot. These islands serve as exceptional systems for studies of species formation and biogeography (Ricklefs and Bermingham 2008). Our ongoing large-scale inventory of Caribbean arachnids (CarBio) is rapidly uncovering new species across the arachnid tree of life and offering new insight into Caribbean biogeography (e.g., Dziki et al. 2015; Agnarsson et al. 2018; Chamberland et al. 2018; Čandek et al. 2019; Tong et al. 2019; Čandek et al. 2020). Yet the biodiversity of many of these islands, including Hispaniola, remains poorly known, especially with respect to tiny cryptic arthropods, such as oonopid spiders. The family currently includes 1846 species distributed in 113 genera, making it the 8th largest spider family (World Spider Catalog 2020). In 2006, the Planetary Biodiversity Inventory (PBI, 2020) project on was launched. At the time only 459 species of were known (PBI, 2020). In eleven years, the PBI project led to the discovery and descriptions of nearly 1300 new oonopid species, increasing our knowledge of the fauna by 300%. Yet, new species continue to be discovered as new areas are more thoroughly sampled, such as during the ongoing Caribbean arachnid biodiversity inventory (project CarBio). are small (1.0–5.0 mm) yellow, orange to bright red haplogyne spiders. Most members of this family are found living in leaf litter, but some live in canopies (Fannes et al. 2008, Platnick and Dupérré 2011b) or caves (Chamberlin and Ivie 1938), and some are termite nest inquilines (Benoit 1964) or even ant-mimics (Fannes and Jocqué 2008; Platnick and Dupérré 2011b). Oonopids typically have six large contiguous eyes (Ubick 2005), but some species have only two (Platnick 2000), or lack eyes altogether (Chamberlin and Ivie 1938; Benoit 1964; Baehr and Ubick 2010). Oonopids show other striking morphological features, including some with elongated carapace prongs (Abrahim et al. 2012), clypeal prongs (Platnick and Dupérré 2011a) and various cheliceral and endite modifications (e.g., Kranz-Baltensperger 2012; Tong et al. 2018). But an even more peculiar morphological feature is the occurrence of male palpal asymmetry, extremely rare in spiders (Huber et al. 2007), but found in oonopid genera such as , (Platnick and Dupérré 2009, 2011c). In the left and right male palps are so different that if observed independently, even experienced taxonomists would consider them to belong to distinct species (Platnick and Dupérré 2011c). Platnick and Dupérré (2009) revised the genus , including 14 species, of which 10 were new. The type species of the genus, (Simon, 1892), is pantropical, while the remainder of the group has a circum-Caribbean distribution, occurring from Mexico to Dominica (Platnick and Dupérré 2009). In 2009, four species were known to occur in Dominican Republic: (Platnick & Dupérré, 2009), (Platnick & Dupérré, 2009), (Bryant, 1948) and (Platnick & Dupérré, 2009). Here we describe ten new species and report for the first time the presence of the pantropical genotype, , as well as new localities for , and . We demonstrate substantial genetic divergence between these species and analyze biogeographic patterns within Hispaniola using mitochondrial phylogenies.

Material and methods

Collections examined

All 66 specimens examined are from the 2012 CarBio expedition to Dominican Republic, unless otherwise noted. They were all found in leaf litter samples that were sifted in the field and either hand sorted, or extracted through Berlese funnels. Specimens are stored at the Natural History Museum in Vermont, USA (UVM); type specimens are deposited at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, USA (NMNH, USNMENT). Specimens were roughly sorted in-field and stored in 95% ethanol at -20 °C upon return to the laboratory. Species determination was done through morphological assessment, followed by molecular phylogenetic analyses. Genetic divergences guided further morphological assessment and final species delineation.

Morphological assessment

Specimens were collected and examined in 95% ethanol under a SMZ-U Nikon dissection microscope. A Nikon Coolpix 950 digital camera attached to the microscope was used to photograph all the structures to be illustrated. The digital photos were used to trace proportions and the illustrations were detailed and shaded by referring back to the structure under the microscope. Female genitalia were excised using a sharp entomological needle and submerged in lactic acid to clear internal structures. The structures were photographed and illustrated as explained above. All measurements are in millimeters. For complete morphological description of the genus see Platnick and Dupérré (2009: 17–21). Nomenclatural morphology follows Platnick and Dupérré (2009).

Molecular analyses

DNA extraction was done with the QIAGEN DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA). We sequenced fragments of the mitochondrial Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) and 16S ribosomal RNA (16S), which are typically effective phylogenetic markers at low taxonomic levels for spiders. We amplified COI with LCO1490-2776 and 16S with 16SF and 16SR using standard protocols (see e.g., Agnarsson et al. 2007). PCR products were sequenced at the University of Arizona, Beckman Genomics, or the Smithsonian Institution. Sequences were interpreted from chromatograms using Phred and Phrap (Green and Ewing 2002, Green 2009) within the Chromaseq module (Maddison and Maddison 2020) in Mesquite 3.61 (Maddison and Maddison 2019), with default parameters. The sequences were then proofread by examining chromatograms by eye. The taxon sampling in our final dataset included mitochondrial sequences for 37 of 38 from the Dominican Republic in our dataset (Table 1). We obtained COI data for all 37 of these specimens, and 16S for 32 of 37. Neither CO1 nor 16S amplified from the single representative of sp. nov. The concatenated alignment is 1114 nucleotides.
Table 1.
Species (ND 17)sextype?LocalityLatitude / Longitudeelev mCO116sGenBank LabelSpecimen Name
H. spinimanus fDR Beach trail to Cueva del Puente, Parque Nacional del Este 18.32902N, 068.80995W 0 MT636140 MT635438 H._spinimanus_fH. spin 01-1
H. verruca sp. nov.mholotypeDR Cachote Biosphere Reserve 18.09786N, 071.18925W 1200 MT636136 MT635434 H._verruca_n_sp_m1H. verr 37-1
fparatypeDR Cachote Biosphere Reserve 18.09786N, 071.18925W 1200 MT636137 MT635435 H._verruca_n_sp_f1H. verr 37-2
mDR Cachote Biosphere Reserve 18.09786N, 071.18925W 1200 MT636139 MT635437 H._verruca_n_sp_m2H. verr 37-3
mDR Cachote Biosphere Reserve 18.09786N, 071.18925W 1200 MT636138 MT635436 H._verruca_n_sp_m3H. verr 37-4
H. validus mDR Inside cueva del puente, Parque Nacional del Este 18.3816N, 068.8017W 25 MT636112 MT635415 H._validus_m1H. val 02-1
fDR Inside cueva del puente, Parque Nacional del Este 18.3816N, 068.8017W 25 MT636113 H._validus_f1H. val 02-2
fDR Inside cueva del puente, Parque Nacional del Este 18.3816N, 068.8017W 25 MT636114 MT635416 H._validus_f2H. val 02-3
mDR Inside cueva del puente, Parque Nacional del Este 18.3816N, 068.8017W 25 MT636115 H._validus_m2H. val 02-4
mDR Inside cueva del puente, Parque Nacional del Este 18.3816N, 068.8017W 25 MT636116 H._validus_m3H. val 02-5
H. carlosviquezi sp. nov.fholotypeDR Loma Quita Espuela 19.34405N, 069.46635W 200 MT636111 MT635414 H._carlosviquezi_n_sp_f7B11-2
H. castelloides mDR Loma Quita Espuela 19.34405N, 069.46635W 200 MT636124 MT635423 H._castelloides_mH. cast 11-1
H. vega mDR Loma Quita Espuela 19.34405N, 069.46635W 200 MT636123 H._vega_mH. veg 11-3
H. yuma sp. nov.fholotypeDR Loma Quita Espuela 19.34405N, 069.46635W 200 MT636122 MT635422 H._yuma_n_sp_f1H. veg 11-1
fparatypeDR Loma Quita Espuela 19.34405N, 069.46635W 200 MT636121 MT635421 H._yuma_n_sp_f2H. veg 11-2
H. aylinalegreae sp. nov.mDR Los Haitises: Cueva la Arena 19.08013N, 069.4649W 17 MT636132 MT635430 H._aylinalegreae_n_sp_m3H. five 07-1
H. renebarbai sp. nov.mholotypeDR Los Haitises: Cueva la Arena 19.08013N, 069.4649W 17 MT636110 MT635413 H._renebarbai_n_sp_mH. six 07-1
H. aylinalegreae sp. nov.mholotypeDR Parque del Este 18.355536N, 068.61825W 46 MT636128 MT635427 H._aylinalegreae_n_sp_m1H. five 03-1
fDR Parque del Este 18.355536N, 068.61825W 46 MT645158 H._aylinalegreae_n_sp_f3H. five 03-2
fDR Parque del Este 18.355536N, 068.61825W 46 MT636131 MT635429 H._aylinalegreae_n_sp_f1H. five 03-3
fDR Parque del Este 18.355536N, 068.61825W 46 MT636129 H._aylinalegreae_n_sp_f2H. five 03-4
mDR Parque del Este 18.355536N, 068.61825W 46 MT636130 MT635428 H._aylinalegreae_n_sp_m2H. five 03-5
H. constanza sp. nov.mholotypeDR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park) 18.688N, 070.596W 2100 MT636125 MT635424 H._constanza_n_sp_mH. cast 24-1
fparatypeDR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park) 18.688N, 070.596W 2100 MT636126 MT635425 H._constanza_n_sp_f1H. cast 24-2
fparatypeDR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park) 18.688N, 070.596W 2100 MT636127 MT635426 H._constanza_n_sp_f2H. cast 24-3
H. gabrielsantosi sp. nov.fparatypeDR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park) 18.688N, 070.596W 2100 MT636133 MT635431 H._gabrielsantosi_n_sp_f2H. one 24-1
fholotypeDR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park) 18.688N, 070.596W 2100 MT636135 MT635433 H._gabrielsantosi_n_sp_f1H. one 24-2
fparatypeDR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park) 18.688N, 070.596W 2100 MT636134 MT635432 H._gabrielsantosi_n_sp_f3H. one 24-3
H. jurassicus sp. nov.mDR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park) 18.688N, 070.596W 2100 MT636117 MT635417 H._jurassicus_n_sp_m1H. jur 24-1
mDR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park) 18.688N, 070.596W 2100 MT636120 MT635420 H._jurassicus_n_sp_m2H. jur 24-3
fDR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park) 18.688N, 070.596W 2100 MT636118 MT635418 H._ jurassicus_n_sp_f1H. jur 24-4
fDR Valle Nuevo (Jurassic Park) 18.688N, 070.596W 2100 MT636119 MT635419 H._ jurassicus_n_sp_f2H. jur 24-5
H. scapula sp. nov.fparatypeDR Valle Nuevo Rd 18.84633N, 070.74064W 2983 MT636109 MT635412 H._ scapula_n_sp_fH. two 22-2
mholotypeDR Valle Nuevo, NP; Valle Nuevo Rd 18.84633N, 070.74064W 2983 MT636108 H._scapula_n_sp_mH. two 22-1
Oonopidae sp 1fDR Los Haitises: Cueva la Arena 19.08013N, 069.4649W 17 MT636142 MT635440 Oonopidae_sp_1_DR_fH. six 07-2
Oonopidae sp 2fPR Mona Island: Bajuga Empalme MT636141 MT635439 Oonopidae_sp_2_Mona_fH. mona 1
00392858 Stenoonops portoricensisfPR Ranger Station, Guanica Dry Forest 17.971472N, 066.86795W 154 MT636143 00392858_S._portoricensis
For phylogenetic analyses, alignments were done in MAFFT (Katoh 2013) through the online portal EMBL-EBI, using default settings but increasing the tree rebuilding and maxiterate settings to 100. Gaps were treated as missing characters. The aligned sequences for COI, and 16S, were tested for the best fitting substitution model using the program Jmodeltest 2.1.7 (Darriba et al. 2012). The best models for each gene, among the 24 models available in MrBayes, were GTR+G for 16S and GTR+I+G for COI. We conducted Bayesian analyses using MrBayes V3.2.3 through the online portal CIPRES (Miller et al. 2010) on the concatenated mtDNA dataset. The Bayesian analyses ran 10,000,000 generations, sampling every 1000 generations. We used Tracer (Drummond and Rambaut 2007) to verify proper convergence of runs and sufficient sampling of priors.

Abbreviations

Somatic morphology ALE anterior lateral eye PLE posterior lateral eye PME posterior median eye Genitalia (female) ar anterior receptaculum ef epigastric furrow es epigastric scutum pr posterior receptaculum ps postepigastric scutum wp wing like projections Genitalia (male) c bulb c conductor e embolus

Results

The ten new species of presented in this work are genetically distinct and distinguishable morphologically. They were all collected in leaf litter samples from forest or cave habitats in Hispaniola ranging from near sea level to 2983 m. Mitochondrial genetic divergences and patterns of relationships belie a deep and old history of on Hispaniola (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.

Summary phylogeny of the included species rendering support for the monophyly (multiple samples per species) or exclusivity (single specimens) of each species dealt with here. Species color scheme equals that on map in Figure 40. New species are highlighted in bold. Thick branches have >95% posterior probability support, thin branches have >75% posterior probability support. Scale bar indicates the number of expected changes on branches. Inset photo of female sp. nov. For more detailed specimen-level phylogeny see Suppl. material 1.

Summary phylogeny of the included species rendering support for the monophyly (multiple samples per species) or exclusivity (single specimens) of each species dealt with here. Species color scheme equals that on map in Figure 40. New species are highlighted in bold. Thick branches have >95% posterior probability support, thin branches have >75% posterior probability support. Scale bar indicates the number of expected changes on branches. Inset photo of female sp. nov. For more detailed specimen-level phylogeny see Suppl. material 1.
Figure 40.

Distribution map of all species found in Hispaniola.

Taxonomy

Dalmas, 1916 48E80FC4-CD7C-5FA5-B6EA-FA1ABA5B4ABA
Composition.
Platnick & Dupérré, 2009, sp. nov., sp. nov., Platnick & Dupérré, 2009, (Chickering, 1971), Dumitrescu & Georgescu, 1983, sp. nov., Platnick & Dupérré, 2009, sp. nov., Platnick & Dupérré, 2009, n. sp, Platnick & Dupérré, 2009, Platnick & Dupérré, 2009, sp. nov., Platnick & Dupérré, 2009, sp. nov., (Gertsch & Davis, 1942), sp. nov., Platnick & Dupérré, 2009, (Simon, 1891), Platnick & Dupérré, 2009, (Bryant, 1948), Platnick & Dupérré, 2009, sp. nov., sp. nov.
Distribution.
Mexico, Costa Rica, Bahama Islands, Cuba, Jamaica, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Saba, Montserrat and Dominica ( (Simon, 1891) presents a pantropical distribution).
Diagnosis.
Males are easily diagnosed from all other by the presence of one or two backward-pointing projections on the male palpal endites (Figs 29–33). Females are easily diagnosed by their elongated, spinose pedipalpi (Platnick and Dupérré 2009, fig. 181).
Figures 28, 29.

sp. nov.. Female. 28 Epigynal region, ventral view 29 internal genitalia, dorsal view.

Figures 30–33.

sp. nov. Male (30, 31), female (32, 33). 30 Palp, prolateral view 31 palp, apical view 32 epigynal region, ventral view 33 internal genitalia, dorsal view.

Dupérré sp. nov. 9AA74717-8748-5B35-B4B5-F32542B34701 http://zoobank.org/00009E22-3BB0-462B-855D-E4B136FEDCB2 Figs 2–5 , 34 , 40
Figures 2–5.

sp. nov. Male (2, 3), female (4, 5). 2 Palp, prolateral view 3 palp, apical view 4 epigynal region, ventral view 5 internal genitalia dorsal view.

Figures 34–39.

Male endites, ventral view. 34 sp. nov. 35 sp. nov. 36 sp. nov. 37 sp. nov. 38 sp. nov. 39 sp. nov.

Type material.
Male holotype from Dominican Republic, La Vega Province, Constanza, Valle Nuevo National Park, , 2983 m, 26.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747000). One female paratype, same data.
Etymology.
The specific epithet is a noun in apposition meaning wings, in reference to the large wing-like structures of the female internal genitalia. Males are diagnosed from all species by the combination of the following characters: constricted tip of palpal bulb and their bent embolus, wider apically, long conductor reaching the tip of the embolus (Figs 2, 3); females are diagnosed by the large, anterior wing-like projections of their internal genitalia and triangular anterior receptaculum (Fig. 5).
Description.
Male (holotype): Total length: 1.9; carapace length: 1.0; carapace width: 0.7. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, bright orange; pars cephalica flat. Sternum yellow; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites yellow with one elongated and thin apical backward-pointing projection (Fig. 34); labium light yellow. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval, PME squared; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; light gray covered dorsally with long dark setae; epigastric and postepigastric scuta light orange, well sclerotized. : Yellow; tibia I with five pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with 2 pairs of ventral spines; leg formula undetermined, missing legs II-III-IV. : Palpal segments light yellow; palpal bulb whitish. Palpal femur, patella and tibia with spines prolaterally (Fig. 2). Palpal bulb ovoid constricted at tip (Fig. 2); embolus long, bent medially, wider apically; conductor elongated and thin, wider apically, reaching the tip of the embolus (Fig. 3). Female (paratype): Total length: 1.98; carapace length: 0.94; carapace width: 0.74. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, bright orange; pars cephalica flat. Sternum, labium and chelicerae: as in male. Endites without projection. : Same as male. : Oval; gray; epigastric and postepigastric scuta orange, well sclerotized (Fig. 4). : Color as in male; all legs missing; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding, with large structure visible through the epigastric scutum (Fig. 4). Internal genitalia with triangular anterior receptaculum, projecting posteriorly into a plate-like extrusion; posterior receptaculum not observed; wing-like projections well sclerotized, tridimensional (Fig. 5). sp. nov. Male (2, 3), female (4, 5). 2 Palp, prolateral view 3 palp, apical view 4 epigynal region, ventral view 5 internal genitalia dorsal view.
Other material examined.
None. Dominican Republic, La Vega Province (Fig. 40). Dupérré sp. nov. CF69ED80-E608-58EF-8E6D-A815545DF104 http://zoobank.org/F8D0A1A4-B6CF-438F-BADD-7C5FCAAA995B Figs 6–9 , 35 , 40
Figures 6–9.

sp. nov. Male (6, 7), female (8, 9). 6 Palp, prolateral view 7 palp, apical view 8 epigynal region, ventral view 9 internal genitalia, dorsal view.

Male holotype from Dominican Republic, La Vega Province, Constanza, Valle Nuevo National Park, ‘Jurassic Park’, , 2100 m, 26.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747001). Two female paratypes, same data. The specific epithet is a noun in apposition taken from the type locality, Jurassic Park, Dominican Republic. Males are distinguished from all species of the genera by the spatula-shaped tip of the embolus (Fig. 7). Females are distinguished by their large funnel-shaped anterior receptaculum (Fig. 9). Male (holotype): Total length: 1.93; carapace length: 1.03; carapace width: 0.96. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, bright orange; pars cephalica slightly elevated. Sternum orange; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites orange with one very small apical backward-pointing projection (Fig. 35); labium light orange. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae orange; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs long, 2/3 the length of the chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME rectangular; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; beige dorsally covered with long dark setae; epigastric and postepigastric scuta orange, well sclerotized. : Orange; tibia I with five pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with two pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123. : Palpal segments yellow; palpal bulb whitish. Palpal patella, tibia and tarsus with spines prolaterally (Fig. 6). Palpal bulb ovoid slightly constricted at tip (Fig. 6); embolus long, bent medially with transparent spatula-shaped tip; conductor long and thin reaching the tip of the embolus (Fig. 7). Female (paratype): Total length: 2.12; carapace length: 0.92; carapace width: 0.76. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, yellow; pars cephalica flat. Sternum and labium light yellow. Chelicerae and endites light yellow, not modified. : as in male. : Oval, light beige; epigastric and postepigastric scuta orange, well sclerotized (Fig. 8). : Light yellow; tibia I with five pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with two pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding, with funnel-shaped and rectangular structures visible through the epigastric scutum (Fig. 8). Internal genitalia with funnel-shaped anterior receptaculum; posterior receptaculum not observed; wing-like projections well sclerotized, tridimensional (Fig. 9) sp. nov. Male (6, 7), female (8, 9). 6 Palp, prolateral view 7 palp, apical view 8 epigynal region, ventral view 9 internal genitalia, dorsal view. Same data as type specimens: 1♂ (USNMENT 00788060), 1♂ (USNMENT 00788048), 1♀ (USNMENT 00788084); 3♂, 4♀ (UVM). Dominican Republic, La Vega Province (Fig. 40). Dupérré sp. nov. 92425C20-8C32-56DB-A678-BAE3CC81B417 http://zoobank.org/EBB74055-FC21-4252-AD4C-F4628928F811 Figs 10–13 , 36 , 40
Figures 10–13.

sp. nov. Male (10, 11), female (12, 13). 10 Palp, prolateral view 11 palp, apical view 12 epigynal region, ventral view 13 internal genitalia, dorsal view.

Male holotype from Dominican Republic, La Alta Gracia Province, Occidental, San Rafael, del Este National Park, , 46 m, 7–8.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747002). One male and four female paratypes, same data (USNMENT 01747003). The specific epithet is a noun in apposition honoring local arachnologist and CarBio collaborator Aylin Alegre. Males are diagnosed from all by the combination of the following characters: embolus well sclerotized, not spatulated apically; short conductor not reaching the tip of the embolus (Fig. 11); females are diagnosed by their inverse triangular anterior receptaculum and large posterior receptaculum (Fig. 13). Male (holotype): Total length: 1.65; carapace length: 0.79; carapace width: 0.67. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, light yellow; pars cephalica flat. Sternum light yellow; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites light yellow with one small apical backward-pointing projection (Fig. 35); labium light yellow. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME squared; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; light gray, dorsally covered with long dark setae; epigastric and postepigastric scuta light yellow, not well sclerotized. : Femora whitish; other legs segments light yellow; tibia I with one pair of ventral spines, metatarsus I with two pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123. : Palpal segments yellow; palpal bulb whitish. Palpal patella, tibia and tarsus with spines prolaterally (Fig. 10). Palpal bulb ovoid slightly constricted at tip (Fig. 10); embolus well sclerotized, curved with pointed tip; conductor short and pointed not reaching tip of the embolus (Fig. 11). Female (paratype): Total length: 1.89; carapace length: 0.81; carapace width: 0.67. : Carapace, sternum, labium and chelicerae: as in male. Endites without projection. : Same as male. : Oval; light gray; epigastric and postepigastric light yellow, not well sclerotized (Fig. 12). : Color as in male; tibia I with three pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with two pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding, with tulip-shaped structure visible through the epigastric scutum (Fig. 12). Internal genitalia with inverted triangular anterior receptaculum; posterior receptaculum large, pouch-shaped, wrinkled with pore field; wing-like projections short (Fig. 13). sp. nov. Male (10, 11), female (12, 13). 10 Palp, prolateral view 11 palp, apical view 12 epigynal region, ventral view 13 internal genitalia, dorsal view. 1♂ Dominican Republic, Hato Mayor Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, Parque Nacional los Haitises, Cueva La Arena, , 17♂, 12.vi.2012, team CarBio (UVM); 1♂3♀ Dominican Republic, La Alta Gracia Province, Occidental, San Rafael, del Este National Park, , 46 m, 7–8.vi.2012, team CarBio (UVM). Dominican Republic, La Alta Gracia and Hato Mayor provinces (Fig. 40). Dupérré sp. nov. DE2A5A9C-39DD-523D-A860-59AE4CE9A393 http://zoobank.org/18B6E9E1-0B6C-45C8-B724-85C0A3279651 Figs 14–18 , 37 , 40
Figures 14–18.

sp. nov. Male (14–16), female (17, 18). 14 Palp, prolateral view 15 palp, apical view 16 palp, retrolateral view 17 epigynal region, ventral view 18 internal genitalia, dorsal view.

Male holotype from Dominican Republic, Barahona Province, Cachote Biosphere Reserve, , 1200 m, 7.vii.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747004). One female paratype, same data. The specific epithet is a noun in apposition meaning wart in reference to the male palpal bulb bearing a wart-like projection. Males can be diagnosed from all species by the wart-like projection on the prolateral side of the bulb (Fig. 14); females can be diagnosed by their small heart-shaped posterior receptaculum (Fig. 18). Male (holotype): Total length: 1.9; carapace length: 0.95; carapace width: 0.79. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, bright yellow; pars cephalica flat. Sternum yellow; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites yellow with one large, median backward-pointing projection (Fig. 37); labium yellow. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 the length of the chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME rectangular; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; light beige covered dorsally with long dark setae; epigastric and postepigastric scuta light yellow, well sclerotized. : Femora with basal half whitish, apical half-light yellow, other legs segments light yellow; tibia I with three pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with two pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123. : Palpal segments yellow; palpal bulb whitish. Palpal patella and tibia with spines prolaterally (Fig. 14). Palpal bulb ovoid with apical triangular bump and prolateral wart-like projection (Figs 13, 14); embolus and conductor set on an oval base with apical ridges (Figs 15, 16); embolus well sclerotized, wide and triangular; conductor spine-like, well sclerotized reaching the tip of the embolus (Fig. 16). Female (paratype): Total length: 2.04; carapace length: 0.98; carapace width: 0.76. : Carapace, sternum, labium and chelicerae: as in male. Endites without projection. : Same as male. : Oval, light beige; epigastric and postepigastric scuta orange, well sclerotized (Fig. 17). : Color as in male; leg I missing; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding, with small, squared structure visible through the epigastric scutum, and triangular plate visible through the epigastric furrow (Fig. 17). Internal genitalia with triangular anterior receptaculum, projecting posteriorly; posterior receptaculum small, bulbous with pore field; wing-like projections not observed (Fig. 18). sp. nov. Male (14–16), female (17, 18). 14 Palp, prolateral view 15 palp, apical view 16 palp, retrolateral view 17 epigynal region, ventral view 18 internal genitalia, dorsal view. Same data as type specimens: 2♂ (UVM). Dominican Republic, Barahona Province (Fig. 40). Dupérré sp. nov. 7808B2FC-D64F-503F-BE41-15FB8458846C http://zoobank.org/803999F5-7C2D-4CE6-9C83-6264977AA215 Figs 19 , 20 , 38 , 40
Figures 19, 20.

sp. nov. Male. 19 Palp, prolateral view 20 palp, apical view.

Male holotype from Dominican Republic, Hato Mayor Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, los Haitises National Park, outside Cueva La Arena, , 17m, 12.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747005). The specific epithet is a noun in apposition honoring local arachnologist and CarBio collaborator René Barba. Males are distinguished from most species by their elongated, thin embolus (Fig. 19); from by their long and pointed conductor (Fig. 20), flat and with denticles in the later (Platnick and Dupérré 2009, fig. 194). Male (holotype): Total length: 1.34; carapace length: 0.71; carapace width: 0.59. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, light yellow; pars cephalica flat. Sternum light yellow; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites light yellow with an elongated apical backward-pointing projection with rounded tip (Fig. 38); labium light yellow. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME squared; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; light beige covered dorsally with long dark setae; epigastric and postepigastric scuta light yellow, not well sclerotized. : Light yellow; tibia I with two pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with one pair of ventral spines; leg formula undertermined, legs II-III-IV missing. : Palpal segments light yellow; palpal bulb whitish. Palpal femur, patella and tibia with spines prolaterally (Fig. 19). Palpal bulb ovoid (Fig. 19); embolus well sclerotized, long and thin; conductor long and pointed, initiating at base of embolus (Figs 19, 20). sp. nov. Male. 19 Palp, prolateral view 20 palp, apical view. Female: Unknown. None. Dominican Republic, Hato Mayor Province (Fig. 40). Dupérré sp. nov. 2099344E-63AD-5A78-ACB4-B6F08F9C2142 http://zoobank.org/C9159DF2-1A78-4434-BA1E-65A51DD10D33 Figs 21 , 22 , 40
Figures 21, 22.

sp. nov. Female. 21 Epigynal region, ventral view 22 internal genitalia, dorsal view.

Female holotype from Dominican Republic, Duarte Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, Loma Quita Espuela, , 200 m, 14.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747006). Female paratype, same data (USNMENT 01747007). The specific name is noun in apposition taken from the type locality, San Rafael de Yuma, Dominican Republic. Females are distinguished from most species by the anterior receptaculum positioned on a narrow, short stalk; from by their larger anterior receptaculum projecting posteriorly (Fig. 22), not projecting in the later species (Platnick and Dupérré 2009, fig. 211). Female (holotype) Total length: 1.86; carapace length: 0.76; carapace width: 0.61. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, whitish; pars cephalica flat. Sternum whitish; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites withish, not modified; labium light whitish. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae pale yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME squared; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; yellowish; epigastric and postepigastric scuta pale yellow, not well sclerotized (Fig. 21). : whitish; tibia I with four pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with three pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding with faint structure visible through the scuta (Fig. 21). Internal genitalia with triangular anterior receptaculum, projecting posteriorly (Fig. 22); posterior receptaculum transparent, W-shaped; wing-like projections golf club-shaped (Fig. 22). sp. nov. Female. 21 Epigynal region, ventral view 22 internal genitalia, dorsal view. Male: Unknown. None. Dominican Republic, Duarte Province (Fig. 40). Dupérré sp. nov. E89446B4-8D50-5470-9678-367D5BE422B5 http://zoobank.org/9192A67A-94FD-4CE5-852B-AE9586764724 Figs 23–25 , 40
Figures 23–27.

sp. nov., female (23–25). sp. nov., female (27). 23 Epigynal region, ventral view 24 internal genitalia, dorsal view 25 abdomen, dorsal view 26 epigynal region, ventral view 27 internal genitalia, dorsal view.

Female holotype from Dominican Republic, Duarte Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, Loma Quita Espuela, , 200 m, 14.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747008). The specific epithet is a noun in apposition honoring Costa Rican arachnologist and CarBio collaborator Carlos Viquez. Females are easily diagnosed by their umbrella-shaped anterior receptaculum (Fig. 24). Female: Total length: 2.06; carapace length: 0.96; carapace width: 0.8. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, light orange; pars cephalica flat. Sternum yellow; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites yellow, not modified; labium light yellow. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME squared; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; dark grayish-blue with pattern, apically whitish (Fig. 25); epigastric and postepigastric scuta light orange, well sclerotized (Fig. 23). : Orange; tibia I with four pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with three pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding, with bell-shaped structure visible through the epigastric scutum (Fig. 23). Internal genitalia with umbrella-shaped anterior receptaculum; posterior receptaculum globose with large pore field; wing-like projections large, ear-shaped (Fig. 24). Male: Unknown. None. Dominican Republic, Duarte Province (Fig. 40). Dupérré sp. nov. 8E94F832-848A-5967-B350-14A80DE0D75E http://zoobank.org/33CC4CA3-3B84-43A9-978D-CF5391CEFEAC Figs 26 , 27 , 40 Female holotype from Dominican Republic, La Vega Province, Constanza, Valle Nuevo National Park, ‘Jurassic Park’, , 2100 m, 26.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747009). Two female paratypes (USNMENT 01747010, 01747011), same data. The specific epithet is a noun in apposition honoring local arachnologist and CarBio collaborator Gabriel Santos. Females can be diagnosed from all species by the arch wing-like projections of the internal genitalia and large oval posterior receptaculum (Fig. 27). Female: Total length: 2.31; carapace length: 0.91; carapace width: 0.84. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, light yellow; pars cephalica flat. Sternum light yellow; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites light yellow, not modified; labium light yellow. Clypeus vertical, short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae light yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME squared; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; whitish covered dorsally with long dark setae; epigastric and postepigastric scuta light orange, well sclerotized (Fig. 26). : Femora with basal half whitish, apical half, light yellow; other leg segments light yellow; tibia I with four pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with three pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding, with crcifix-shaped structure visible through the scutum and the epigastric furrow (Fig. 26). Internal genitalia with triangular anterior receptaculum, projecting posteriorly; posterior receptaculum elongated oval, with large pore field; wing-like projections arched (Fig. 27). sp. nov., female (23–25). sp. nov., female (27). 23 Epigynal region, ventral view 24 internal genitalia, dorsal view 25 abdomen, dorsal view 26 epigynal region, ventral view 27 internal genitalia, dorsal view. Male: Unknown. None. Dominican Republic, La Vega Province (Fig. 40). Dupérré sp. nov. 3D640485-4E00-5372-BD6C-39302506D195 http://zoobank.org/F190F990-F3D6-4881-B509-382DE2BEA50C Figs 28 , 29 , 40 Female holotype from Dominican Republic, Duarte Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, Loma Quita Espuela, , 200 m, 14.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747012). The specific epithet is a noun in apposition honoring local arachnologist and CarBio collaborator Solanlly Carrrero. Females are diagnosed from all species by their posteriorly protruding epigastric scutum and their oval posterior receptaculum with folded bag-like extension (Fig. 29). Female (holotype). Total length: 1.37; carapace length: 0.61; carapace width: 0.42. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, whitish; pars cephalica flat. Sternum whitish; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites whitish, not modified; labium whitish. Clypeus vertical; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae whitish; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME squared; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; light gray covered dorsally with long dark setae; epigastric scutum protruding, postepigastric scutum thin; scuta light yellow, not well sclerotized (Fig. 28). : Whitish; tibia I with three pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus I with two pairs of ventral spines; leg formula 4123; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region protruding ventrally (not visible on image) with anchor-shaped structure visible through the epigastric scutum and epigastric furrow (Fig. 28). Internal genitalia with hat-shaped anterior receptaculum; posterior receptaculum oval with small pore field region and folded bag-like extension; wing-like projections anvil-shaped (Fig. 29). sp. nov.. Female. 28 Epigynal region, ventral view 29 internal genitalia, dorsal view. Male: Unknown. None. Dominican Republic, La Duarte Province (Fig. 40). Dupérré sp. nov. A0EE1E54-3663-5884-AA76-1614129215C8 http://zoobank.org/C1FAE1A8-EA65-4320-8419-A24E63086580 Figs 30–33 , 39 , 40 Male holotype from Dominican Republic, La Vega Province, Constanza, Valle Nuevo National Park, ‘Jurassic Park’, , 2100 m, 26.vi.2012, team CarBio (NMNH, USNMENT 01747013). Two female paratypes (USNMENT 01747014), same data. The specific name is noun in apposition taken from the type locality, Constanza Province, Dominican Republic. Both males and females closely resemble Platnick & Dupérré, 2009; males are distinguished by the narrow, elongated palpal bulb and palpal tibia 2× longer than patellae (Fig. 30), ovoid in the later species, and palpal tibia 1.5× longer than patellae (Platnick and Dupérré 2009, fig. 242); females are distinguished by their anterior recepetaculum with four branches (Fig. 33), five in (Platnick and Dupérré 2009, fig. 259). Male (holotype): Total length: 1.79; carapace length: 0.86; carapace width: 0.72. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, pale yellow; pars cephalica slightly elevated. Sternum pale yellow; longer than wide; covered entirely with long dark setae. Endites pale yellow, with small apical projection (Fig. 39); labium light yellow. Clypeus sligthly protruding; short (1/2× radius of ALE). Chelicerae yellow; promargin and retromargin without teeth; fangs normal, 1/3 length of chelicerae. : Six eyes surrounded by black pigmentation; ALE largest, oval; PME rounded; PLE smallest, oval; ALE separated by their radius; ALE-PLE touching; PLE-PME touching; PME touching. : Oval; beige covered dorsally with long setae; epigastric and postepigastric scuta inconspicuous. : Legs missing. : Palpal segments pale yellow; palpal bulb whitish. Palpal femora, tibia and tarsus with spines prolaterally (Fig. 30). Palpal bulb elongated (Fig. 30); embolus strongly bent, pointed apically; conductor long and thin reaching the tip of the embolus (Fig. 31). Female (paratype): Total length: 2.09; carapace length: 0.85; carapace width: 0.72. : Carapace ovoid; shiny, yellow; pars cephalica flat. Sternum and labium light yellow. Chelicerae and endites light yellow, not modified. : as in male. : Oval, light beige; epigastric and postepigastric scuta pale yellow, not well sclerotized (Fig. 32). : Legs missing; all palpal segments with strong spines. : Epigynal region not protruding, with tree-shaped structures slightly visible through the epigastric scutum (Fig. 32). Internal genitalia with anterior receptaculum elongated with four main branches; posterior receptaculum triangular well sclerotized; wing-like projections elongated and narrow (Fig. 33). sp. nov. Male (30, 31), female (32, 33). 30 Palp, prolateral view 31 palp, apical view 32 epigynal region, ventral view 33 internal genitalia, dorsal view. None. Male endites, ventral view. 34 sp. nov. 35 sp. nov. 36 sp. nov. 37 sp. nov. 38 sp. nov. 39 sp. nov. Dominican Republic, La Vega Province (Fig. 40). Distribution map of all species found in Hispaniola.

New records

(Simon, 1891) 6B0D1243-AEAE-59EE-BB2F-93AB03C87058 Fig. 40

Material examined.

Dominican Republic, La Alta Gracia Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, del Este National Park, beach Trail to Cueva del Puente, , 0 m, 5.vi.2012, team CarBio,1♀ (UVM). Platnick & Dupérré, 2009 10301FC4-03CD-5822-A47F-E395DF228073 Fig. 40 Dominican Republic, La Duarte Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, Loma Quita Espuela, , 200 m, 14.vi.2012, team CarBio, 1♂ (UVM). (Bryant, 1948) A0103482-1EB1-59F7-9CD3-F2A7D4A6D418 Fig. 40 Dominican Republic, La Alta Gracia Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, del Este National Park, Cueva del Puente, , 25 m, 6.vi.2012, team CarBio, 3♂4♀ (UVM). Platnick & Dupérré, 2009 6A3BF836-79F3-589A-8E15-409428D50394 Fig. 40 Dominican Republic, La Duarte Province, Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, Loma Quita Espuela, , 200m, 14.vi.2012, team CarBio, 1♂ (UVM).

Discussion

Observed patterns in our data are consistent with a high probability that our sampling has only detected a small subset of the diversity in Hispaniola. First, we found a total of 66 individuals distributed in 14 species, 10 of which were new, from only eight sampling sites. At a single site in Loma Quita (200 m) we found five species including three that are new (, , ) and two that represent new records (, ). Similarly, we found three new species in one locality in a high elevation forest (2100 m) in the Cordillera Central Parque National Valle Nuevo (, , ). Moreover, a fourth new species , was discovered in the same park at higher elevation (2983 m). Taxa from both of these localities are phylogenetically widespread reflecting an old most recent common ancestor and high levels of subsequent diversification (Fig. 1)). This contrasts with patterns seen in more dispersive Caribbean spiders that rarely have more than a single species of a given genus in one locality (e.g., Dziki et al. 2015, Agnarsson et al. 2018, Čandek et al. 2019, Tong et al. 2019) Despite patterns consistent with high local diversity, there is evidence that some species are wide ranging. Two taxa that represent new records were collected far from their type localities in the Cordillera Central, , and Interestingly both of these species have been collected in flight intercept traps (Platnick and Dupérré 2009) suggesting the potential for aerial dispersal. Additionally, one species described here, , was collected in two separate low elevation localities on the northern and southern sides of Eastern Hispaniola. While it seems that some members of this genus are capable of widespread dispersal, most notably the type species, the high levels of diversity in the Dominican Republic suggest an old presence and much speciation within West Indies, consistent with biologies that are not typically dispersal prone.
  11 in total

1.  The phylogeny of the social Anelosimus spiders (Araneae: Theridiidae) inferred from six molecular loci and morphology.

Authors:  Ingi Agnarsson; Wayne P Maddison; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 4.286

Review 2.  The West Indies as a laboratory of biogeography and evolution.

Authors:  Robert Ricklefs; Eldredge Bermingham
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The evolution of asymmetric genitalia in spiders and insects.

Authors:  Bernhard A Huber; Bradley J Sinclair; Michael Schmitt
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2007-11

4.  Huntsmen of the Caribbean: Multiple tests of the GAARlandia hypothesis.

Authors:  Yanfeng Tong; Greta Binford; Cristina A Rheims; Matjaž Kuntner; Jie Liu; Ingi Agnarsson
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.286

5.  jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing.

Authors:  Diego Darriba; Guillermo L Taboada; Ramón Doallo; David Posada
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability.

Authors:  Kazutaka Katoh; Daron M Standley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment.

Authors:  Kazutaka Katoh; Kei-ichi Kuma; Hiroyuki Toh; Takashi Miyata
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Spintharus flavidus in the Caribbean-a 30 million year biogeographical history and radiation of a 'widespread species'.

Authors:  Austin Dziki; Greta J Binford; Jonathan A Coddington; Ingi Agnarsson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  A new genus of oonopid spiders from Myanmar (Araneae, Oonopidae).

Authors:  Yanfeng Tong; Haifeng Chen; Sijia Liu; Shuqiang Li
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 1.546

10.  Biogeography of the Caribbean Cyrtognatha spiders.

Authors:  Klemen Čandek; Ingi Agnarsson; Greta J Binford; Matjaž Kuntner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.