| Literature DB >> 32938442 |
Camille Poissonnier1, Sarra Ghazal2, Peggy Passavin2, Maria-Paz Alvarado2, Solène Lefort2, Emilie Trehiou-Sechi2, Vittorio Saponaro2, Alix Barbarino3, Julia Delle Cave3, Charlie-Rose Marchal3, Boris Depré3, Etienne Vannucci3, Renaud Tissier4, Patrick Verwaerde3,4, Valérie Chetboul2,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In dogs with congestive heart failure (CHF), the efficacy of torasemide, a loop diuretic, has been demonstrated. However, unlike in dogs and humans little has been described about the use of torasemide in the cat with spontaneous CHF. The objectives of this retrospective study were therefore to describe the therapeutic use of oral torasemide in cats with spontaneous CHF, document its potential adverse effects while reporting the clinical course of this feline population following torasemide administration in addition to standard medical therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Ascites; Cardiomyopathy; Diuretic; Echocardiography; Feline; Pleural effusion; Pulmonary edema
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32938442 PMCID: PMC7493838 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-02554-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Flowchart indicating the status of cats with congestive heart failure (CHF) at initiation of torasemide prescription (n = 21). Among these cats, 10 cats (48%) presented with a first CHF episode requiring a first oral loop diuretic prescription and 11 (52%) had experienced at least one previous CHF episode requiring treatment adjustment owing to CHF deterioration despite furosemide prescription. Torasemide was prescribed, either alone or with an additional daily prescription of furosemide 12 h after torasemide intake (n = 4 at initiation of torasemide prescription, with 4 additional cats during the study period). IRIS stage evolution and death (number and causes of deaths) from Day 0 to the end of follow-up are also described for each feline group
Main epidemiological features as well as clinical, echocardiographic, and blood samples variables assessed at inclusion in the study group (n = 21 cats with congestive heart failure treated with torasemide) as compared with a contemporary control group of 54 cats with congestive heart failure receiving furosemide as sole loop diuretic treatment
| Population of 21 cats treated with torasemide | Control Group (n = 54) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Median (1st quartile - 3rd quartile) | Minimum - Maximum | n | Median (1st quartile – 3rd quartile) | Minimum - Maximum | |
| Age (years) | 21 | 10.6 (6.5–11.2) | 1.8–15.4 | 54 | 7.2 (5.6–9.8) | 0.9–18.2 |
| Weight (kg) | 21 | 4.8 (3.7–6.6) | 3.2–7.0 | 54 | 5.3 (4.5–6.3) | 3.3–7.3 |
| Sex (M/F; %) | 16/5; 76/24 | – | – | 33/21 | – | |
| Heart Murmur (yes/no; %) | 9/12; 43/57 | – | – | 26/28; 48/52 | – | – |
| Gallop sound (yes/no; %) | 9/12; 43/57 | – | – | 7/47; 13/87 | – | – |
| Arrhythmia (yes/no, %) | 5/16; 24/76 | – | – | 0/54; 0/100 | – | – |
| Minimal heart rate | 21 | 225 (192–245) | 170–280 | 54 | 200 (177–230) | 120–320 |
| Furosemide (yes/no; %) | 11/10; 52/48 | – | – | 37/17; 69/31 | – | – |
| Benazepril (yes/no; %) | 7/14; 33/67 | – | – | 15/39; 28/72 | – | – |
| Clopidogrel (yes/no; %) | 5/16; 24/76 | – | – | 16/38; 30/70 | – | – |
| Spironolactone (yes/no %) | 3/18; 14/86 | – | – | 2/52; 4/96 | – | – |
| Pimobendan (yes/no; %) | 3/18; 14/86 | – | – | 3/51; 6/94 | – | – |
| Taurine (yes/no; %) | 2/19; 10/90 | – | – | 2/52; 4/96 | – | – |
| Amlodipine (yes/no; %) | 1/20; 5/95 | – | – | 0/54; 0/100 | – | – |
| Diltiazem (yes/no; %) | 1/20; 5/95 | – | – | 0/54; 0/100 | – | – |
| Atenolol (yes/no; %) | 0/21; 0/100 | - | - | 1/53; 2/98 | - | - |
| Pleural effusion identified (yes/no; %) | 16/5; 76/24 | – | – | 24/30 | – | – |
| LA:Ao ratio at end-diastole | 21 | 1.99 (1.82–2.25) | 1.28–3.50 | 54 | 1.88 (1.61–2.10) | 1.30–2.70 |
| LA dilation (yes/no; %) | 21/0;100/0 | – | – | 54/0; 100/0 | – | – |
| RA (mm) | 21 | 14 (12–20) | 9.7–21.1 | 54 | 14.0 (11.5–15.5) | 6.4–24.8 |
| RA dilation (yes/no; %) | 10/11; 48/52 | – | – | 17/37; 31/69 | – | – |
| FS (%) | 21 | 42 (31–49) | 22–69 | 54 | 41 (36–49) | 15–75 |
| Urea (g/L) | 18 | 0.67 (0.56–0.76) | 0.44–1.19 | 45 | 0.67 (0.56–0.82) | 0.40–1.99 |
| Creatinine (mg/L) | 18 | 15.4 (12.2–17.4) | 9.0–27.0 | 47 | 14.1 (10.7–20.7) | 5.0–38.0 |
| Potassium (mmol/L) | 13 | 3.7 (3.5–4.4) | 3.0–5.3 | 41 | 4.0 (3.4–4.6) | 2.6–5.3 |
| Sodium (mmol/L) | 13 | 151 (150–157) | 143.0–163.0 | 36 | 152 (147–157) | 137–174 |
| IRIS Stage (n; stages 1/2/3; %) | 18; 10/8/0; 56/44/0 | – | – | 47; 27/18/2; 57/38/4 | – | – |
F female; FS fractional shortening; IRIS International Renal Interest Society; LA left atrium; LA:Ao left atrium to aorta ratio; M male; RA right atrium
Fig. 2Serum creatinine evolution after torasemide initiation. Each plot represents serum creatinine values before and 7 to 15 days after torasemide initiation, for the 14 cats with an available creatinine follow-up (reference ranges = 5.2–17.8 mg/L). Median [IQR] creatinine values (15.4 mg/L [12.2–17.4] and 17.0 mg/L [15.2–20.3] before and after torasemide initiation, respectively) were not significantly different (p = 0.12)
Fig. 3Kaplan-Meier curves of survival time from initial torasemide prescription to all-cause death, compared with the control group. Median (IQR; min-max) survival time from diagnosis was 182 days (46–330; 2–347) for the 21 included cats receiving torasemide (with or without furosemide), and 148 days (9–364, 2–1001) for the control group (n = 54 cats receiving furosemide as sole loop diuretic treatment). Median survival time of cats from the control group was not significatively different from that of the torasemide group, p = 0.962. Circles denote censored observations