Literature DB >> 32936481

Reduced fetal growth velocity precedes antepartum fetal death.

P Pacora1,2, R Romero1,3,4,5,6,7, E Jung1,2, D W Gudicha1,2, E Hernandez-Andrade1,2, I Musilova1,2, M Kacerovsky1,2, S Jaiman1,2, O Erez1,2, C D Hsu1,2,8, A L Tarca1,2,9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether decreased fetal growth velocity precedes antepartum fetal death and to evaluate whether fetal growth velocity is a better predictor of antepartum fetal death compared to a single fetal biometric measurement at the last available ultrasound scan prior to diagnosis of demise.
METHODS: This was a retrospective, longitudinal study of 4285 singleton pregnancies in African-American women who underwent at least two fetal ultrasound examinations between 14 and 32 weeks of gestation and delivered a liveborn neonate (controls; n = 4262) or experienced antepartum fetal death (cases; n = 23). Fetal death was defined as death diagnosed at ≥ 20 weeks of gestation and confirmed by ultrasound examination. Exclusion criteria included congenital anomaly, birth at < 20 weeks of gestation, multiple gestation and intrapartum fetal death. The ultrasound examination performed at the time of fetal demise was not included in the analysis. Percentiles for estimated fetal weight (EFW) and individual biometric parameters were determined according to the Hadlock and Perinatology Research Branch/Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (PRB/NICHD) fetal growth standards. Fetal growth velocity was defined as the slope of the regression line of the measurement percentiles as a function of gestational age based on two or more measurements in each pregnancy.
RESULTS: Cases had significantly lower growth velocities of EFW (P < 0.001) and of fetal head circumference, biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference and femur length (all P < 0.05) compared to controls, according to the PRB/NICHD and Hadlock growth standards. Fetuses with EFW growth velocity < 10th percentile of the controls had a 9.4-fold and an 11.2-fold increased risk of antepartum death, based on the Hadlock and customized PRB/NICHD standards, respectively. At a 10% false-positive rate, the sensitivity of EFW growth velocity for predicting antepartum fetal death was 56.5%, compared to 26.1% for a single EFW percentile evaluation at the last available ultrasound examination, according to the customized PRB/NICHD standard.
CONCLUSIONS: Given that 74% of antepartum fetal death cases were not diagnosed as small-for-gestational age (EFW < 10th percentile) at the last ultrasound examination when the fetuses were alive, alternative approaches are needed to improve detection of fetuses at risk of fetal death. Longitudinal sonographic evaluation to determine growth velocity doubles the sensitivity for prediction of antepartum fetal death compared to a single EFW measurement at the last available ultrasound examination, yet the performance is still suboptimal.
© 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal circumference; biparietal diameter; customized growth standard; head circumference; small-for-gestational age; stillbirth

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32936481     DOI: 10.1002/uog.23111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  5 in total

1.  The role of the placenta in spontaneous preterm labor and delivery with intact membranes.

Authors:  Sunil Jaiman; Roberto Romero; Gaurav Bhatti; Eunjung Jung; Francesca Gotsch; Manaphat Suksai; Dahiana M Gallo; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Nicholas Kadar
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.716

Review 2.  Clinical Opinion: The diagnosis and management of suspected fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach.

Authors:  Christoph C Lees; Roberto Romero; Tamara Stampalija; Andrea Dall'Asta; Greggory A DeVore; Federico Prefumo; Tiziana Frusca; Gerard H A Visser; John C Hobbins; Ahmet A Baschat; Caterina M Bilardo; Henry L Galan; Stuart Campbell; Dev Maulik; Francesc Figueras; Wesley Lee; Julia Unterscheider; Herbert Valensise; Fabricio Da Silva Costa; Laurent J Salomon; Liona C Poon; Enrico Ferrazzi; Giancarlo Mari; Giuseppe Rizzo; John C Kingdom; Torvid Kiserud; Kurt Hecher
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 10.693

3.  Fetal growth velocity references from a Chinese population-based fetal growth study.

Authors:  Tianchen Wu; Xiaoli Gong; Yangyu Zhao; Lizhen Zhang; Yiping You; Hongwei Wei; Xifang Zuo; Ying Zhou; Xinli Xing; Zhaoyan Meng; Qi Lv; Zhaodong Liu; Jian Zhang; Liyan Hu; Junnan Li; Li Li; Chulin Chen; Chunyan Liu; Guoqiang Sun; Aiju Liu; Jingsi Chen; Yuan Lv; Xiaoli Wang; Yuan Wei
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  Fetal growth restriction and stillbirth: Biomarkers for identifying at risk fetuses.

Authors:  Victoria J King; Laura Bennet; Peter R Stone; Alys Clark; Alistair J Gunn; Simerdeep K Dhillon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Fetal weight projection model to define growth velocity and validation against pregnancy outcome in a cohort of serially scanned pregnancies.

Authors:  O Hugh; J Gardosi
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 8.678

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.