Literature DB >> 35026129

Clinical Opinion: The diagnosis and management of suspected fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach.

Christoph C Lees1, Roberto Romero2, Tamara Stampalija3, Andrea Dall'Asta4, Greggory A DeVore5, Federico Prefumo6, Tiziana Frusca7, Gerard H A Visser8, John C Hobbins9, Ahmet A Baschat10, Caterina M Bilardo11, Henry L Galan12, Stuart Campbell13, Dev Maulik14, Francesc Figueras15, Wesley Lee16, Julia Unterscheider17, Herbert Valensise18, Fabricio Da Silva Costa19, Laurent J Salomon20, Liona C Poon21, Enrico Ferrazzi22, Giancarlo Mari23, Giuseppe Rizzo24, John C Kingdom25, Torvid Kiserud26, Kurt Hecher27.   

Abstract

This study reviewed the literature about the diagnosis, antepartum surveillance, and time of delivery of fetuses suspected to be small for gestational age or growth restricted. Several guidelines have been issued by major professional organizations, including the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. The differences in recommendations, in particular about Doppler velocimetry of the ductus venosus and middle cerebral artery, have created confusion among clinicians, and this review has intended to clarify and highlight the available evidence that is pertinent to clinical management. A fetus who is small for gestational age is frequently defined as one with an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile. This condition has been considered syndromic and has been frequently attributed to fetal growth restriction, a constitutionally small fetus, congenital infections, chromosomal abnormalities, or genetic conditions. Small for gestational age is not synonymous with fetal growth restriction, which is defined by deceleration of fetal growth determined by a change in fetal growth velocity. An abnormal umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index reflects an increased impedance to flow in the umbilical circulation and is considered to be an indicator of placental disease. The combined finding of an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry has been widely accepted as indicative of fetal growth restriction. Clinical studies have shown that the gestational age at diagnosis can be used to subclassify suspected fetal growth restriction into early and late, depending on whether the condition is diagnosed before or after 32 weeks of gestation. The early type is associated with umbilical artery Doppler abnormalities, whereas the late type is often associated with a low pulsatility index in the middle cerebral artery. A large randomized clinical trial indicated that in the context of early suspected fetal growth restriction, the combination of computerized cardiotocography and fetal ductus venosus Doppler improves outcomes, such that 95% of surviving infants have a normal neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age. A low middle cerebral artery pulsatility index is associated with an adverse perinatal outcome in late fetal growth restriction; however, there is no evidence supporting its use to determine the time of delivery. Nonetheless, an abnormality in middle cerebral artery Doppler could be valuable to increase the surveillance of the fetus at risk. We propose that fetal size, growth rate, uteroplacental Doppler indices, cardiotocography, and maternal conditions (ie, hypertension) according to gestational age are important factors in optimizing the outcome of suspected fetal growth restriction.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial at Term; Doppler velocimetry; Prospective Observational Trial to Optimize Pediatric Health; Trial of Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe; abdominal circumference; cardiotocography; cesarean delivery; ductus venosus; fetal biometry; fetal death; fetal distress; fetal growth; longitudinal; middle cerebral artery; neurodevelopmental outcome; randomized controlled trial; short-term variation; small for gestational age; systematic review; umbilical artery Doppler; umbilical artery pH; uterine artery

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35026129      PMCID: PMC9125563          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   10.693


  104 in total

1.  Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  K Hecher; C M Bilardo; R H Stigter; Y Ville; B J Hackelöer; H J Kok; M V Senat; G H Visser
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 2.  Condition-specific antepartum fetal testing.

Authors:  Eftichia V Kontopoulos; Anthony M Vintzileos
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Neurodevelopmental delay in small babies at term: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Arcangeli; B Thilaganathan; R Hooper; K S Khan; A Bhide
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Ductus venosus shunting in growth-restricted fetuses and the effect of umbilical circulatory compromise.

Authors:  T Kiserud; J Kessler; C Ebbing; S Rasmussen
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  A comparison of Doppler and biophysical findings between liveborn and stillborn growth-restricted fetuses.

Authors:  Sarah Crimmins; Andrea Desai; Dana Block-Abraham; Christoph Berg; Ulrich Gembruch; Ahmet Alexander Baschat
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Changes observed in Doppler studies of the fetal circulation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia or the delivery of a small-for-gestational-age baby. I. Cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  K Harrington; R G Carpenter; M Nguyen; S Campbell
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  Giants in Obstetrics and Gynecology Series: a profile of Christopher Redman, MB, BChir, MRCP, FRCP.

Authors:  Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The value of the short-term fetal heart rate variation for timing the delivery of growth-retarded fetuses.

Authors:  V Serra; M Moulden; J Bellver; C W G Redman
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Is middle cerebral artery Doppler related to neonatal and 2-year infant outcome in early fetal growth restriction?

Authors:  Tamara Stampalija; Birgit Arabin; Hans Wolf; Caterina M Bilardo; Christoph Lees
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT).

Authors:  K E Boers; S M C Vijgen; D Bijlenga; J A M van der Post; D J Bekedam; A Kwee; P C M van der Salm; M G van Pampus; M E A Spaanderman; K de Boer; J J Duvekot; H A Bremer; T H M Hasaart; F M C Delemarre; K W M Bloemenkamp; C A van Meir; C Willekes; E J Wijnen; M Rijken; S le Cessie; F J M E Roumen; J G Thornton; J M M van Lith; B W J Mol; S A Scherjon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-12-21
View more
  5 in total

1.  Prenatal Prediction of Fetal Growth Restriction and Postnatal Outcomes by Ultrasound Assessment of Fetal Myocardial Performance Index and Blood Flow Spectrum.

Authors:  Yanchun Ma; Chunmin Li; Yan Wang; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes in Fetal Growth Restriction and Small for Gestational Age.

Authors:  Chiara Lubrano; Emanuela Taricco; Chiara Coco; Fiorenza Di Domenico; Chiara Mandò; Irene Cetin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  Fetal growth restriction and stillbirth: Biomarkers for identifying at risk fetuses.

Authors:  Victoria J King; Laura Bennet; Peter R Stone; Alys Clark; Alistair J Gunn; Simerdeep K Dhillon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Frequency of positive antiphospholipid antibodies in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection and impact on pregnancy outcome: A single-center prospective study on 151 pregnancies.

Authors:  Giorgia Ingrid Gozzoli; Elda Piovani; Beatrice Negri; Margaret Mascherpa; Rossana Orabona; Cristina Zanardini; Sonia Zatti; Silvia Piantoni; Maria Grazia Lazzaroni; Cesare Tomasi; Federico Prefumo; Enrico Sartori; Franco Franceschini; Angela Tincani; Laura Andreoli
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 5.  Sildenafil during the 2nd and 3rd Trimester of Pregnancy: Trials and Tribulations.

Authors:  Felix Rafael De Bie; David Basurto; Sailesh Kumar; Jan Deprest; Francesca Maria Russo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.