Literature DB >> 32933450

Expert communication on Twitter: Comparing economists' and scientists' social networks, topics and communicative styles.

Marina Della Giusta, Sylvia Jaworska1, Danica Vukadinović Greetham2.   

Abstract

Experts increasingly use social media to communicate with the wider public, prompted by the need to demonstrate impact and public engagement. While previous research on the use of social media by experts focused on single topics and performed sentiment analysis, we propose to extend the scope by investigating experts' networks, topics and communicative styles. We perform social and semantic network as well language analysis of top tweeting scientists and economists. We find that economists tweet less, mention fewer people and have fewer Twitter conversations with members of the public than scientists. Scientists use a more informal and involved style and engage wider audiences through multimedia contents, while economists use more jargon, and tend to favour traditional written media. The results point to differences in experts' communicative practices online, and we propose that disciplinary ways of 'talking' may pose obstacles to an effective public communication of expert knowledge.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Twitter; communicative style; expert communication; involvement; networks; sentiment

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32933450      PMCID: PMC7802044          DOI: 10.1177/0963662520957252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Underst Sci        ISSN: 0963-6625


  15 in total

1.  Persistence of social signatures in human communication.

Authors:  Jari Saramäki; E A Leicht; Eduardo López; Sam G B Roberts; Felix Reed-Tsochas; Robin I M Dunbar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Does literacy improve finance?

Authors:  Martha Poon; Helaine Olen
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2015-04

3.  Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network.

Authors:  Richard Van Noorden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Science communication as political communication.

Authors:  Dietram A Scheufele
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Citizen science. Next steps for citizen science.

Authors:  Rick Bonney; Jennifer L Shirk; Tina B Phillips; Andrea Wiggins; Heidi L Ballard; Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Julia K Parrish
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures.

Authors:  Scott A Golder; Michael W Macy
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Scientific networks on Twitter: Analyzing scientists' interactions in the climate change debate.

Authors:  Stefanie Walter; Ines Lörcher; Michael Brüggemann
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2019-04-26

8.  Semantic Network Analysis Reveals Opposing Online Representations of the Search Term "GMO".

Authors:  Ke Jiang; Brittany N Anderton; Pamela C Ronald; George A Barnett
Journal:  Glob Chall       Date:  2017-12-27

9.  In the mood: the dynamics of collective sentiments on Twitter.

Authors:  Nathaniel Charlton; Colin Singleton; Danica Vukadinović Greetham
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Why should we promote public engagement with science?

Authors:  Jack Stilgoe; Simon J Lock; James Wilsdon
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.